go-http-client
go-http-client is not a single bot but the default User‑Agent string emitted by the Go programming language’s standard net/http client library. It is used by thousands of legitimate applications built with Go—including web crawlers, monitoring tools, API clients, and cloud services—anytime they make HTTP requests without explicitly overriding the default User‑Agent. The string appears in server logs as Go-http-client/1.1 or Go-http-client/2.0, depending on the HTTP version used. Because Go is a popular language for backend systems, the presence of this User‑Agent does not indicate any particular product or company; rather, it signals that the request originated from a Go‑powered tool. Official documentation from the Go project (golang.org/pkg/net/http/) confirms that the default User‑Agent is intentionally generic to avoid disclosing application details.
Technically, the go-http-client follows the standard HTTP/1.1 or HTTP/2 protocol as implemented by the Go net/http package. It makes no special crawling decisions—those are entirely determined by the application developer. Request frequency, concurrency, and target URLs vary widely: a single instance might issue one request per second, or thousands per second, depending on the specific Go program. IP ranges are equally diverse, since the Go client is used from datacenters, cloud providers (AWS, GCP, Azure), and consumer ISPs. The client supports connection reuse (Keep‑Alive) by default, respects redirects (following up to 10 by default), and sends common headers such as Accept-Encoding: gzip. It does not natively parse robots.txt—that responsibility falls on the application code. When rate‑limited, a well‑behaved Go application will implement retry logic with backoff, but the language itself provides no built‑in throttling.
The go-http-client User‑Agent string itself does not directly control robots.txt compliance—that is entirely up to the application using the Go library. Many Go‑based tools, such as the Hugo static site generator or the Prometheus monitoring system, do not crawl websites in the traditional sense and therefore do not consult robots.txt. However, dedicated Go‑written web crawlers (e.g., crawley or custom scrapers) may implement their own robots.txt parsing. There is no central documentation from the Go project regarding robots.txt etiquette; developers are expected to handle it if needed. As a result, webmasters cannot reliably assume that all requests carrying this User‑Agent will honor Disallow directives.
The primary detection indicator is the exact User‑Agent string: Go-http-client/1.1 for HTTP/1.1 requests, Go-http-client/2.0 for HTTP/2 requests, and older versions such as Go-http-client/1.0 may appear in legacy code. The string is always case-insensitive but typically capitalized as shown. Behavioral fingerprints include the use of TLS 1.2 or 1.3 (Go’s default), support for ALPN, and the presence of the Go-http-client header in the request. Because the library is open source under a BSD‑style license (source available at github.com/golang/go), any application can modify or remove the default User‑Agent—so absence of the string does not guarantee a request is not Go‑powered. The Go project itself does not publish a list of associated IP ranges; those depend entirely on the hosting environment of each application.
Data collected by a go-http-client request is used according to the specific application’s purpose—this is not a centralized service. For example, a Go‑based search engine spider (like Bleve’s built‑in crawler) feeds data into a local search index; a monitoring tool like Prometheus scrapes metrics endpoints; and a social‑media bot may store user profiles. There is no common data‑usage policy. The generic User‑Agent is designed to be transparent, not to hide any particular data‑collection practice. Because the string is so widely used, server administrators often treat it as a baseline “unknown” client and apply generic rate‑limiting or allowlisting rules.
Because go-http-client can be emitted by both well‑behaved tools and aggressive scrapers, web applications typically rate‑limit all requests carrying this User‑Agent as a precaution, applying thresholds such as 10–100 requests per minute per IP. The policy rationale is that the generic string provides no information about the client’s intent, so defensive rate‑limiting protects server resources without blocking legitimate uses that cooperate with standard HTTP conventions.
Similar Threats
🛡️
Boteraser automatically detects and blocks unwanted bots — protecting your site from scrapers, DDoS bursts, and credential stuffing attacks without slowing down real visitors.
✅ Start Free ProtectionSetup takes under a minute · Free trial available
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the bots listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.
Stay up to date with the latest from Boteraser.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
CloudFlare provides web performance and security solutions, enhancing site speed and protecting against threats.
Service URL: developers.cloudflare.com (opens in a new window)
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
These cookies are used for managing login functionality on this website.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
You can find more information in our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.