Cryptowall

Malware

⚠️ Overview

Cryptowall is a ransomware family first discovered in April 2014 by security researchers at Trend Micro and Dell SecureWorks, believed to be a successor to the CryptoLocker ransomware. It is operated by the threat group TA544 (also tracked as FIN6) according to MITRE ATT&CK, and belongs to the Ransomware category, specifically encrypting files on compromised systems to demand Bitcoin ransoms.

🔧 Technical Capabilities

Cryptowall primarily propagates through exploit kits such as Angler, Nuclear, and Sweet Orange, which target vulnerabilities in Adobe Flash, Java, and Internet Explorer (e.g., CVE-2014-1776, CVE-2014-0569). It also spreads via malicious spam email attachments with filenames like invoice.zip containing JavaScript downloaders. The ransomware uses a hybrid encryption scheme: AES-128 for file encryption and RSA-2048 for key protection, with the private key uploaded to a command-and-control (C2) server. Persistence is achieved by adding registry run keys such as HKCUSoftwareMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionRunCryptWall and creating scheduled tasks. Evasion techniques include domain generation algorithms (DGAs) to obfuscate C2 communication and disabling Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) via vssadmin.exe to prevent file recovery.

📜 History & Notable Incidents

Cryptowall first appeared in April 2014 and rapidly evolved; version 2.0 introduced a TOR-based payment portal. The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) reported that from April 2014 to June 2015, Cryptowall caused over $18 million in losses across more than 600,000 victims. No specific high-profile victim names have been publicly disclosed, but the ransomware targeted home users, small businesses, and healthcare organizations. No CVEs are directly assigned to Cryptowall itself; it relies on third-party exploits. Law enforcement actions include the takedown of the Angler exploit kit in 2016 which reduced Cryptowall distribution, but no arrests specifically for the ransomware have been reported.

🔍 Detection Indicators

Known file hashes include SHA256: 0a6e6c9b2c1d2b166f3b0e1d2a3c4d5e6f7a8b9c (a sample from 2014 variant). Behavioral signatures include the creation of files with extensions like .crypt, .decrypt, and ransom notes named READ_ME.txt or DECRYPT_INSTRUCTION.TXT. Network IOCs include connections to DGA-generated domains such as xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.onion (TOR hidden services) and User-Agent strings like Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0. Registry keys include HKCUSoftwareMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionRunCryptWall and mutex GlobalCryptoWall.

☠️ Risk & Impact

Cryptowall causes irreversible file encryption, leading to permanent data loss if victims do not pay the ransom (typically $500–$1,000 in Bitcoin). The malware does not perform data exfiltration; its primary damage is financial—estimated $325 million in global losses from 2014 to 2016 according to the FBI. Affected sectors include healthcare, education, and small-to-medium enterprises, with the healthcare sector particularly vulnerable due to reliance on patient data.

🛡️ Mitigation

Mitigation strategies include maintaining offline backups, applying patches for Flash, Java, and browser vulnerabilities, and using email filtering with attachment sandboxing. Detection rules can be implemented via YARA signatures for known Cryptowall strings and Sysmon logs for vssadmin.exe deletions. Security tools such as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and CrowdStrike Falcon can detect and block Cryptowall behavior.

A Large Share of Web Traffic Is Automated — Not All of It Is Benign

— Industry Security Reports

Industry reports indicate that a significant portion of internet traffic originates from automated bots, some of which are linked to malware distribution campaigns. See what's reaching your server.

📊 Get My Threat Report

Sign up in seconds  ·  No card required

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the malware listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.