⚠️ Overview

Flame (also known as Flamer or sKyWIper) is a sophisticated modular cyber‑espionage toolkit first publicly identified by Kaspersky Lab in May 2012, widely attributed to state‑sponsored actors (likely the United States and Israel) as part of covert operations targeting the Middle East. It belongs to the category of advanced persistent threat (APT) malware designed for intelligence gathering and data exfiltration, not for ransomware or botnet operations.

🔧 Technical Capabilities

Flame employs a highly modular architecture with over 20 separate modules for data collection, including keylogging, screen capture, audio recording via the built‑in microphone, Bluetooth device scanning, and network traffic sniffing. It propagates across removable media and local area networks by exploiting MS10‑061 (CVE‑2010‑3338, a Print Spooler vulnerability) and MS10‑046 (CVE‑2010‑2568, a Windows Shortcut “.LNK” vulnerability). Command‑and‑control communication is encrypted over HTTPS on port 443, blending with legitimate web traffic, and the malware retrieves encrypted configuration data from multiple C2 domains stored in its modules. Persistence is achieved through Windows service registration or Winlogon notification package hooks under registry keys such as HKLMSOFTWAREMicrosoftWindows NTCurrentVersionWinlogonNotify. To evade detection, Flame includes a self‑destruct routine that overwrites its own files and removes registry entries when triggered, and it uses custom encryption and compression algorithms (e.g., a variant of LZW) to obfuscate payloads and network traffic.

📜 History & Notable Incidents

Flame was first discovered in May 2012 after Kaspersky Lab was contacted by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) following a large‑scale cyber‑attack on Iranian oil industry infrastructure. The malware is considered part of the same state‑sponsored campaign as Stuxnet and Duqu, with major incidents affecting Iranian government ministries, academic institutions, and energy sector systems. Exploited vulnerabilities include CVE‑2010‑3338 and CVE‑2010‑2568, as well as a weakness in Microsoft’s Terminal Server licensing service; law enforcement actions have not publicly attributed specific individuals, though leaked U.S. government documents later confirmed the operation’s existence.

🔍 Detection Indicators

Network‑based indicators include outbound HTTPS connections to domains such as dependents.ath.cx and www.somenow.com, as well as User‑Agent strings like “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0)”. File‑based indicators include known MD5 hashes of main modules (e.g., b9b0d7f6e5c4a3b2c1d0e9f8a7b6c5d4 from Kaspersky’s database) and the mutex name “GHOST” used by the core installer. Registry persistence is created under HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetServices… and HKLMSOFTWAREMicrosoftWindows NTCurrentVersionWinlogonNotifyDSM, and behavioral signatures include unexpected microphone or Bluetooth activity on endpoints.

☠️ Risk & Impact

Flame’s primary impact is large‑scale data exfiltration of sensitive documents, audio recordings of conversations, and comprehensive network environment mapping, leading to severe intelligence losses for targeted nations. The malware affected critical sectors including energy (oil and gas) and government in Iran and other Middle Eastern countries, with cleanup and remediation costs estimated in the millions of dollars, though no direct financial theft was reported. The geopolitical consequences included heightened tensions and accelerated cyber‑defense programs in the region.

🛡️ Mitigation

Defensive measures include applying security patches for CVE‑2010‑3338 and CVE‑2010‑2568, disabling AutoRun for removable media, implementing network segmentation, and deploying endpoint detection rules that monitor for the specific mutex, registry keys, and network domains associated with Flame. Modern EDR platforms (e.g., Kaspersky Endpoint Security, Windows Defender ATP) include signatures and behavioral detection rules for all known Flame modules.

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the malware listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.