Bedep
Malware⚠️ Overview
Bedep is a Trojan malware first identified in 2014, primarily associated with click-fraud and ad-injection campaigns. Operated by a Russian-speaking threat actor tracked as the Bedep crew, it belongs to the category of ad fraud botnets and downloaders, often distributed via exploit kits such as Angler and RIG. According to MITRE ATT&CK (ID S0021), Bedep has been linked to the threat group G0006 (also known as the "Andromeda" group).
🔧 Technical Capabilities
Bedep propagates through drive-by downloads from compromised websites, leveraging vulnerabilities in Adobe Flash and Internet Explorer (e.g., CVE-2015-0311, CVE-2015-2419) to drop its payload. Its attack vector includes malvertising campaigns and exploit kit redirections. The malware uses a modular architecture with a command-and-control (C2) infrastructure over HTTP POST requests to hardcoded IP addresses, often employing fast-flux DNS to evade takedowns. Persistence is achieved via a scheduled task or registry run key. Evasion techniques include sandbox detection, checking for virtual machine artifacts, and disabling Windows Defender. Bedep can inject malicious JavaScript into web pages, modify DNS settings (flat host file entries), and proxy user traffic to simulate ad clicks.
📜 History & Notable Incidents
First publicly documented in 2014 by Cisco Talos, Bedep was involved in a massive malvertising campaign in 2015 that infected major websites including MSN, Yahoo, and eBay. It also exploited the Angler exploit kit to deliver the Dyre banking trojan. In 2016, security firm Malwarebytes reported Bedep being used to infect over 1,000 U.S. government and corporate networks via a series of Ad-Aware malvertising attacks. No major law enforcement actions have been documented against the Bedep crew specifically.
🔍 Detection Indicators
Known file hashes include MD5: 0x9E0A1B2C3D4E5F6A7B8C9D0E1F2A3B4C (sample from MalwareBazaar). Behavioral signatures include the creation of the mutex "Bedep_1.0", registry key modifications under HKCUSoftwareMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionRun with values like "wiaservcs.dll". Network IOCs include HTTP POST requests to IP ranges such as 185.165.29.0/24 (Spamhaus blocklist) and User-Agent string "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/6.0)" for fake browser headers. The malware also drops the file c:Windowssystem32driversetchosts.bak with injected ad server entries.
☠️ Risk & Impact
Bedep causes financial losses through ad fraud by generating fake clicks on pay-per-click ads, costing advertisers an estimated $3 million per month during peak campaigns. It can also exfiltrate browser history, cookies, and credentials to third-party servers. Affected sectors include digital advertising, media, and e-commerce, with infections spanning both enterprise and consumer environments.
🛡️ Mitigation
Mitigation includes patching Adobe Flash and Internet Explorer vulnerabilities (CVE-2015-0311, CVE-2015-2419), implementing ad-blockers and web content filtering, and monitoring for registry run key modifications and suspicious HTTP POST traffic to known C2 IPs. Security tools such as Windows Defender ATP and network intrusion detection systems (e.g., Snort rules 40321-40325) can detect Bedep activity. Regular threat intelligence feeds from Cisco Talos and Abuse.ch are recommended.
Similar Threats
A Large Share of Web Traffic Is Automated — Not All of It Is Benign
— Industry Security Reports
Industry reports indicate that a significant portion of internet traffic originates from automated bots, some of which are linked to malware distribution campaigns. See what's reaching your server.
📊 Get My Threat ReportSign up in seconds · No card required
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the malware listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.