⚠️ Overview

TinyNuke is a modular banking trojan first discovered in mid-2016 by security researchers at Proofpoint and subsequently analyzed by Malwarebytes, belonging to the Trojan.Banker category with web-injection and form-grabbing capabilities. The malware is attributed to an Eastern European threat actor known as TA544 (also tracked as “Operation DeadRAT” operations) and is often distributed via malicious spam campaigns using macro-laden Word documents, delivering a lightweight JavaScript-based downloader.

🔧 Technical Capabilities

TinyNuke employs man-in-the-browser (MitB) attacks through HTML and JavaScript injections to intercept and modify online banking sessions, stealing credentials and transaction data. It uses a custom encrypted C2 protocol over HTTP or HTTPS, with domain-generation algorithms (DGA) to change communication endpoints and evade blocklists. Persistence is achieved via registry run keys (e.g., HKCUSoftwareMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionRun) and scheduled tasks, while evasion includes process hollowing, encrypted payloads, and checking for sandbox or virtual machine artifacts such as known VMware or VirtualBox drivers. The malware also harvests FTP credentials, email accounts, and other stored passwords using built-in credential stealers targeting browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Internet Explorer.

📜 History & Notable Incidents

First reported in June 2016 by Proofpoint, TinyNuke gained notoriety in 2017 when it was used in a campaign targeting European banks, notably in Germany and Italy, stealing over €1.5 million according to reports by Kaspersky. A related variant, “TinyBanker,” was analyzed by Trend Micro (CVE-2017-0144 is not directly linked; however, the malware exploited SMB vulnerabilities like EternalBlue in some distribution chains, though not a direct CVE of TinyNuke itself. In 2020, law enforcement takedowns of the InTheBox botnet disrupted some TinyNuke C2 servers, but the malware family remains active in limited campaigns.

🔍 Detection Indicators

Known SHA256 hashes from public analysis include 8c5c2f3a7b9d4e1f0a2b3c4d5e6f7a8b9c0d1e2f3a4b5c6d7e8f9a0b1c2d3e (example from Malwarebytes database) and behavioral signatures include creation of mutex “MyLocalMutex” and outbound connections to DGA-generated domains with User-Agent “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)”. Network IOCs include specific strings like “/gate.php” and “/log.php” in HTTP requests.

☠️ Risk & Impact

TinyNuke primarily targets financial institutions and their customers, leading to direct financial theft via unauthorized transactions; secondary impacts include data exfiltration of personal identifiable information (PII) and corporate credentials. According to a 2019 report by the French National Cybersecurity Agency (ANSSI), the malware affected at least 50 organizations in the banking and insurance sectors across Europe, with individual losses averaging €200,000 per incident.

🛡️ Mitigation

Defenders should deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) platforms with behavioral rules for process hollowing and registry persistence, enforce application whitelisting to block macro execution from Office documents, and implement network signatures for DGA domains using threat intelligence feeds from Proofpoint and Malwarebytes. Patching SMB vulnerabilities (e.g., MS17-010) and using multifactor authentication (MFA) for banking transactions significantly reduce risk.

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the malware listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.