🛡️ CVE-2023-42443 — vyper

🟠 CVSS 8.0 — High ⚠️ Exploit Public CWE-787 OSV
8.0
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Vyper vulnerable to memory corruption in certain builtins utilizing msize

Impact

In certain conditions, the memory used by the builtins raw_call, create_from_blueprint and create_copy_of can be corrupted.

  • For raw_call, the argument buffer of the call can be corrupted, leading to incorrect calldata in the sub-context.
  • For create_from_blueprint and create_copy_of, the buffer for the to-be-deployed bytecode can be corrupted, leading to deploying incorrect bytecode.

Below are the conditions that must be fulfilled for the corruption to happen for each builtin:

raw_call

  • memory is not fully initialized, ex. all parameters to an external function live in calldata

and

  • The data argument of the builtin is msg.data.

and

  • The to, value or gas passed to the builtin is some complex expression that results in writing to uninitialized memory (e.g. calling an internal function)

create_copy_of

  • memory is not fully initialized, ex. all parameters to an external function live in calldata

and

  • The value or salt passed to the builtin is some complex expression that results in writing to uninitialized memory (e.g. calling an internal function)

create_from_blueprint

  • memory is not fully initialized, ex. all parameters to an external function live in calldata

and

  • Either no constructor parameters are passed to the builtin or raw_args is set to True.

and

  • The value or salt passed to the builtin is some complex expression that results in writing to uninitialized memory (e.g. calling an internal function)

Note: When the builtin is being called from an internal function f from a function g, the issue is not present provided that g has written to memory before calling f.

Examples

raw_call

In the following contract, calling bar(1,1) will return:

``` Python

ae42e95100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff00000001

```

instead of:

``` Python

ae42e95100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001

```

```Python

identity: constant(address) = 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000004

@external

def foo():

pass

@internal

@view

def get_address()->address:

a:uint256 = max_value(uint256) # 0xfff...fff

return identity

@external

def bar(f:uint256, u:uint256) -> Bytes[100]:

a: Bytes[100] = raw_call(self.get_address(), msg.data, max_outsize=100)

return a

```

create_copy_of

In the following contract, after calling test(), the code deployed at self.created_address does not match the bytecode at target.

``` Vyper

created_address: public(address)

@external

def test(target: address) -> address:

# The expression in salt= is complex and will require to store to memory

self.created_address = create_copy_of(target, salt = keccak256(_abi_encode(target)))

return self.created_address

```

create_from_blueprint

In the following contract, after calling test(), the init bytecode used to create the contract deployed at the address self.created_address will not match the blueprint bytecode stored at target.

``` Vyper

created_address: public(address)

salt: constant(bytes32) = keccak256("kebab")

@external

@payable

def test(target: address):

# The expression in salt= is complex and will require to store to memory

self.created_address = create_from_blueprint(target, code_offset=0, salt=keccak256(_abi_encode(target)))

```

Patches

issue tracking in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/issues/3609, patched in #3610

Workarounds

The complex expressions that are being passed as kwargs to the builtin should be cached in memory prior to the call to the builtin. For the last example above, it would be:

``` Vyper

created_address: public(address)

salt: constant(bytes32) = keccak256("kebab")

@external

@payable

def test(target: address):

salt: bytes32 = keccak256(_abi_encode(target))

self.created_address = create_from_blueprint(target, code_offset=0, salt=salt)

```

References

_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability high.

Weakness class

CVE-2023-42443 is classified as CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. Data is written past the end or before the start of a buffer, corrupting whatever is stored there.

Affected software

CVE-2023-42443 is recorded against 1 package.

  • vyper (from 0.3.4 up to 0.3.10)

Timeline and source

Published on 20 September 2023 and last revised on 17 June 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from OSV.

References

github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.0
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE CWE-787
Public Exploit ⚠️ Yes
Source OSV
Published 2023-09-20
Updated 2026-08-12
Modified 2026-06-17

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
vyper 0.3.4 0.3.10

Similar Threats

Exploit Protection

Are you running vyper?

CVE-2023-42443 carries CVSS 8.0 High rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.

Check My Site For CVE-2023-42443 →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2023