Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2024-50118 — kernel

🟡 CVSS 5.5 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit NVD
5.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

btrfs: reject ro->rw reconfiguration if there are hard ro requirements

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: reject ro->rw reconfiguration if there are hard ro requirements

[BUG]

Syzbot reports the following crash:

BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): disabling free space tree

BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE (0x1)

BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID (0x2)

Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000003: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI

KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000018-0x000000000000001f]

Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014

RIP: 0010:backup_super_roots fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1691 [inline]

RIP: 0010:write_all_supers+0x97a/0x40f0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4041

Call Trace:

<TASK>

btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1eae/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2530

btrfs_delete_free_space_tree+0x383/0x730 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1312

btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xf28/0x1300 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3012

btrfs_remount_rw fs/btrfs/super.c:1309 [inline]

btrfs_reconfigure+0xae6/0x2d40 fs/btrfs/super.c:1534

btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount fs/btrfs/super.c:2020 [inline]

btrfs_get_tree_subvol fs/btrfs/super.c:2079 [inline]

btrfs_get_tree+0x918/0x1920 fs/btrfs/super.c:2115

vfs_get_tree+0x90/0x2b0 fs/super.c:1800

do_new_mount+0x2be/0xb40 fs/namespace.c:3472

do_mount fs/namespace.c:3812 [inline]

__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4020 [inline]

__se_sys_mount+0x2d6/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3997

do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]

do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83

entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

[CAUSE]

To support mounting different subvolume with different RO/RW flags for

the new mount APIs, btrfs introduced two workaround to support this feature:

  • Skip mount option/feature checks if we are mounting a different

subvolume

  • Reconfigure the fs to RW if the initial mount is RO

Combining these two, we can have the following sequence:

  • Mount the fs ro,rescue=all,clear_cache,space_cache=v1

rescue=all will mark the fs as hard read-only, so no v2 cache clearing

will happen.

  • Mount a subvolume rw of the same fs.

We go into btrfs_get_tree_subvol(), but fc_mount() returns EBUSY

because our new fc is RW, different from the original fs.

Now we enter btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount(), which switches the RO flag

first so that we can grab the existing fs_info.

Then we reconfigure the fs to RW.

  • During reconfiguration, option/features check is skipped

This means we will restart the v2 cache clearing, and convert back to

v1 cache.

This will trigger fs writes, and since the original fs has "rescue=all"

option, it skips the csum tree read.

And eventually causing NULL pointer dereference in super block

writeback.

[FIX]

For reconfiguration caused by different subvolume RO/RW flags, ensure we

always run btrfs_check_options() to ensure we have proper hard RO

requirements met.

In fact the function btrfs_check_options() doesn't really do many

complex checks, but hard RO requirement and some feature dependency

checks, thus there is no special reason not to do the check for mount

reconfiguration.

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached with local access to the system, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

  • Attack vector: Local — a local account, shell or session on the host is needed.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: Low — an ordinary user account is enough.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: None.
  • Integrity impact: None.
  • Availability impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.

Affected software

CVE-2024-50118 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • kernel (from 6.8.0 up to 6.11.6)
  • linux-kernel

Timeline and source

Published on 5 November 2024 and last revised on 12 August 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
git.kernel.org (Package)

Other advisories for this package

kernel has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

CVE-2024-50118 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity Medium
CVSS Score 5.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CWE N/A
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2024-11-05
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-08-12

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
kernel 6.8.0 6.11.6
linux-kernel — —

Similar Threats

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in kernel

CVE-2024-50118 is rated CVSS 5.5 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2024
✓