🛡️ CVE-2024-6119 — 500f-firmware

🟠 CVSS 7.5 — High ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-843 NVD
7.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS

clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory

address resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.

Impact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of

service.

Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking

server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when

comparing the expected name with an otherName subject alternative name of an

X.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the

application program.

Note that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not

affected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also

specifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.

TLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they

generally don't perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected

identity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the

certificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity

of the issue is Moderate.

The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.

Weakness class

CVE-2024-6119 is classified as CWE-843: Type Confusion. A resource is accessed as one type while actually being another, so the interpretation of its memory is wrong.

Affected software

CVE-2024-6119 is recorded against 19 packages.

  • 500f-firmware
  • a250-firmware
  • active-iq-unified-manager
  • bootstrap-os
  • brocade-fabric-operating-system
  • c250-firmware
  • h300s-firmware
  • h410c-firmware
  • h410s-firmware
  • h500s-firmware
  • h610c-firmware
  • h610s-firmware
  • h615c
  • h700s-firmware
  • management-services-for-element-software-and-netapp-hci
  • ontap-9
  • ontap-select-deploy-administration-utility
  • ontap-tools
  • openssl (from 3.3.0 up to 3.3.2)

Timeline and source

Published on 3 September 2024 and last revised on 17 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
openssl-library.org
www.openwall.com
lists.freebsd.org
security.netapp.com
cert-portal.siemens.com
cert-portal.siemens.com
cert-portal.siemens.com

CVE-2024-6119 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 7.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CWE CWE-843
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2024-09-03
Updated 2026-08-11
Modified 2026-06-17

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
500f-firmware
a250-firmware
active-iq-unified-manager
bootstrap-os
brocade-fabric-operating-system
c250-firmware
h300s-firmware
h410c-firmware
h410s-firmware
h500s-firmware
h610c-firmware
h610s-firmware
h615c
h700s-firmware
management-services-for-element-software-and-netapp-hci
ontap-9
ontap-select-deploy-administration-utility
ontap-tools
openssl 3.3.0 3.3.2

References

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is 500f-firmware part of your stack?

CVE-2024-6119 is rated CVSS 7.5 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.