🛡️ CVE-2025-21932 — kernel

🟠 CVSS 7.0 — High ✅ No Known Exploit NVD
7.0
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

mm: abort vma_modify() on merge out of memory failure

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm: abort vma_modify() on merge out of memory failure

The remainder of vma_modify() relies upon the vmg state remaining pristine

after a merge attempt.

Usually this is the case, however in the one edge case scenario of a merge

attempt failing not due to the specified range being unmergeable, but

rather due to an out of memory error arising when attempting to commit the

merge, this assumption becomes untrue.

This results in vmg->start, end being modified, and thus the proceeding

attempts to split the VMA will be done with invalid start/end values.

Thankfully, it is likely practically impossible for us to hit this in

reality, as it would require a maple tree node pre-allocation failure that

would likely never happen due to it being 'too small to fail', i.e. the

kernel would simply keep retrying reclaim until it succeeded.

However, this scenario remains theoretically possible, and what we are

doing here is wrong so we must correct it.

The safest option is, when this scenario occurs, to simply give up the

operation. If we cannot allocate memory to merge, then we cannot allocate

memory to split either (perhaps moreso!).

Any scenario where this would be happening would be under very extreme

(likely fatal) memory pressure, so it's best we give up early.

So there is no doubt it is appropriate to simply bail out in this

scenario.

However, in general we must if at all possible never assume VMG state is

stable after a merge attempt, since merge operations update VMG fields.

As a result, additionally also make this clear by storing start, end in

local variables.

The issue was reported originally by syzkaller, and by Brad Spengler (via

an off-list discussion), and in both instances it manifested as a

triggering of the assert:

VM_WARN_ON_VMG(start >= end, vmg);

In vma_merge_existing_range().

It seems at least one scenario in which this is occurring is one in which

the merge being attempted is due to an madvise() across multiple VMAs

which looks like this:

start end

|<------>|

|----------|------|

| vma | next |

|----------|------|

When madvise_walk_vmas() is invoked, we first find vma in the above

(determining prev to be equal to vma as we are offset into vma), and then

enter the loop.

We determine the end of vma that forms part of the range we are

madvise()'ing by setting 'tmp' to this value:

/* Here vma->vm_start <= start < (end|vma->vm_end) */

tmp = vma->vm_end;

We then invoke the madvise() operation via visit(), letting prev get

updated to point to vma as part of the operation:

/* Here vma->vm_start <= start < tmp <= (end|vma->vm_end). */

error = visit(vma, &prev, start, tmp, arg);

Where the visit() function pointer in this instance is

madvise_vma_behavior().

As observed in syzkaller reports, it is ultimately madvise_update_vma()

that is invoked, calling vma_modify_flags_name() and vma_modify() in turn.

Then, in vma_modify(), we attempt the merge:

merged = vma_merge_existing_range(vmg);

if (merged)

return merged;

We invoke this with vmg->start, end set to start, tmp as such:

start tmp

|<--->|

|----------|------|

| vma | next |

|----------|------|

We find ourselves in the merge right scenario, but the one in which we

cannot remove the middle (we are offset into vma).

Here we have a special case where vmg->start, end get set to perhaps

unintuitive values - we intended to shrink the middle VMA and expand the

next.

This means vmg->start, end are set to... vma->vm_start, start.

Now the commit_merge() fails, and vmg->start, end are left like this.

This means we return to the rest of vma_modify() with vmg->start, end

(here denoted as start', end') set as:

start' end'

|<-->|

|----------|------|

| vma | next |

|----------|------|

So we now erroneously try to split accordingly. This is where the

unfortunate

---truncated---

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached with local access to the system, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability high.

Affected software

CVE-2025-21932 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • kernel (from 6.13.0 up to 6.13.7)
  • linux-kernel

Timeline and source

Published on 1 April 2025 and last revised on 6 August 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
git.kernel.org (Package)

CVE-2025-21932 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity High
CVSS Score 7.0
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE N/A
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2025-04-01
Updated 2026-08-12
Modified 2026-08-06

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
kernel 6.13.0 6.13.7
linux-kernel

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is kernel part of your stack?

CVE-2025-21932 is rated CVSS 7.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2025