🛡️ CVE-2025-21977 — kernel

🟡 CVSS 5.5 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit NVD
5.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

fbdev: hyperv_fb: Fix hang in kdump kernel when on Hyper-V Gen 2 VMs

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fbdev: hyperv_fb: Fix hang in kdump kernel when on Hyper-V Gen 2 VMs

Gen 2 Hyper-V VMs boot via EFI and have a standard EFI framebuffer

device. When the kdump kernel runs in such a VM, loading the efifb

driver may hang because of accessing the framebuffer at the wrong

memory address.

The scenario occurs when the hyperv_fb driver in the original kernel

moves the framebuffer to a different MMIO address because of conflicts

with an already-running efifb or simplefb driver. The hyperv_fb driver

then informs Hyper-V of the change, which is allowed by the Hyper-V FB

VMBus device protocol. However, when the kexec command loads the kdump

kernel into crash memory via the kexec_file_load() system call, the

system call doesn't know the framebuffer has moved, and it sets up the

kdump screen_info using the original framebuffer address. The transition

to the kdump kernel does not go through the Hyper-V host, so Hyper-V

does not reset the framebuffer address like it would do on a reboot.

When efifb tries to run, it accesses a non-existent framebuffer

address, which traps to the Hyper-V host. After many such accesses,

the Hyper-V host thinks the guest is being malicious, and throttles

the guest to the point that it runs very slowly or appears to have hung.

When the kdump kernel is loaded into crash memory via the kexec_load()

system call, the problem does not occur. In this case, the kexec command

builds the screen_info table itself in user space from data returned

by the FBIOGET_FSCREENINFO ioctl against /dev/fb0, which gives it the

new framebuffer location.

This problem was originally reported in 2020 [1], resulting in commit

3cb73bc3fa2a ("hyperv_fb: Update screen_info after removing old

framebuffer"). This commit solved the problem by setting orig_video_isVGA

to 0, so the kdump kernel was unaware of the EFI framebuffer. The efifb

driver did not try to load, and no hang occurred. But in 2024, commit

c25a19afb81c ("fbdev/hyperv_fb: Do not clear global screen_info")

effectively reverted 3cb73bc3fa2a. Commit c25a19afb81c has no reference

to 3cb73bc3fa2a, so perhaps it was done without knowing the implications

that were reported with 3cb73bc3fa2a. In any case, as of commit

c25a19afb81c, the original problem came back again.

Interestingly, the hyperv_drm driver does not have this problem because

it never moves the framebuffer. The difference is that the hyperv_drm

driver removes any conflicting framebuffers *before* allocating an MMIO

address, while the hyperv_fb drivers removes conflicting framebuffers

*after* allocating an MMIO address. With the "after" ordering, hyperv_fb

may encounter a conflict and move the framebuffer to a different MMIO

address. But the conflict is essentially bogus because it is removed

a few lines of code later.

Rather than fix the problem with the approach from 2020 in commit

3cb73bc3fa2a, instead slightly reorder the steps in hyperv_fb so

conflicting framebuffers are removed before allocating an MMIO address.

Then the default framebuffer MMIO address should always be available, and

there's never any confusion about which framebuffer address the kdump

kernel should use -- it's always the original address provided by

the Hyper-V host. This approach is already used by the hyperv_drm

driver, and is consistent with the usage guidelines at the head of

the module with the function aperture_remove_conflicting_devices().

This approach also solves a related minor problem when kexec_load()

is used to load the kdump kernel. With current code, unbinding and

rebinding the hyperv_fb driver could result in the framebuffer moving

back to the default framebuffer address, because on the rebind there

are no conflicts. If such a move is done after the kdump kernel is

loaded with the new framebuffer address, at kdump time it could again

have the wrong address.

This problem and fix are described in terms of the kdump kernel, but

it can also occur

---truncated---

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached with local access to the system, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.

Affected software

CVE-2025-21977 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • kernel (from 6.13.0 up to 6.13.8)
  • linux-kernel

Timeline and source

Published on 1 April 2025 and last revised on 15 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
git.kernel.org (Package)

CVE-2025-21977 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity Medium
CVSS Score 5.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CWE N/A
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2025-04-01
Updated 2026-08-12
Modified 2026-07-15

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
kernel 6.13.0 6.13.8
linux-kernel

Similar Threats

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in kernel

CVE-2025-21977 is rated CVSS 5.5 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2025