🛡️ CVE-2025-37843 — kernel

🟡 CVSS 5.5 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit NVD
5.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

PCI: pciehp: Avoid unnecessary device replacement check

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

PCI: pciehp: Avoid unnecessary device replacement check

Hot-removal of nested PCI hotplug ports suffers from a long-standing race

condition which can lead to a deadlock: A parent hotplug port acquires

pci_lock_rescan_remove(), then waits for pciehp to unbind from a child

hotplug port. Meanwhile that child hotplug port tries to acquire

pci_lock_rescan_remove() as well in order to remove its own children.

The deadlock only occurs if the parent acquires pci_lock_rescan_remove()

first, not if the child happens to acquire it first.

Several workarounds to avoid the issue have been proposed and discarded

over the years, e.g.:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/4c882e25194ba8282b78fe963fec8faae7cf23eb.1529173804.git.lukas@wunner.de/

A proper fix is being worked on, but needs more time as it is nontrivial

and necessarily intrusive.

Recent commit 9d573d19547b ("PCI: pciehp: Detect device replacement during

system sleep") provokes more frequent occurrence of the deadlock when

removing more than one Thunderbolt device during system sleep. The commit

sought to detect device replacement, but also triggered on device removal.

Differentiating reliably between replacement and removal is impossible

because pci_get_dsn() returns 0 both if the device was removed, as well as

if it was replaced with one lacking a Device Serial Number.

Avoid the more frequent occurrence of the deadlock by checking whether the

hotplug port itself was hot-removed. If so, there's no sense in checking

whether its child device was replaced.

This works because the ->resume_noirq() callback is invoked in top-down

order for the entire hierarchy: A parent hotplug port detecting device

replacement (or removal) marks all children as removed using

pci_dev_set_disconnected() and a child hotplug port can then reliably

detect being removed.

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached with local access to the system, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.

Affected software

CVE-2025-37843 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • kernel (from 6.14.0 up to 6.14.3)
  • linux-kernel (from 6.14 up to 6.14.3)

Timeline and source

Published on 9 May 2025 and last revised on 15 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
git.kernel.org (Package)

CVE-2025-37843 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity Medium
CVSS Score 5.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CWE N/A
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2025-05-09
Updated 2026-08-12
Modified 2026-07-15

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
kernel 6.14.0 6.14.3
linux-kernel 6.14 6.14.3

Similar Threats

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in kernel

CVE-2025-37843 is rated CVSS 5.5 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.