🛡️ CVE-2025-38100 — debian-linux

🟡 CVSS 5.5 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-476 NVD
5.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

x86/iopl: Cure TIF_IO_BITMAP inconsistencies

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

x86/iopl: Cure TIF_IO_BITMAP inconsistencies

io_bitmap_exit() is invoked from exit_thread() when a task exists or

when a fork fails. In the latter case the exit_thread() cleans up

resources which were allocated during fork().

io_bitmap_exit() invokes task_update_io_bitmap(), which in turn ends up

in tss_update_io_bitmap(). tss_update_io_bitmap() operates on the

current task. If current has TIF_IO_BITMAP set, but no bitmap installed,

tss_update_io_bitmap() crashes with a NULL pointer dereference.

There are two issues, which lead to that problem:

1) io_bitmap_exit() should not invoke task_update_io_bitmap() when

the task, which is cleaned up, is not the current task. That's a

clear indicator for a cleanup after a failed fork().

2) A task should not have TIF_IO_BITMAP set and neither a bitmap

installed nor IOPL emulation level 3 activated.

This happens when a kernel thread is created in the context of

a user space thread, which has TIF_IO_BITMAP set as the thread

flags are copied and the IO bitmap pointer is cleared.

Other than in the failed fork() case this has no impact because

kernel threads including IO workers never return to user space and

therefore never invoke tss_update_io_bitmap().

Cure this by adding the missing cleanups and checks:

1) Prevent io_bitmap_exit() to invoke task_update_io_bitmap() if

the to be cleaned up task is not the current task.

2) Clear TIF_IO_BITMAP in copy_thread() unconditionally. For user

space forks it is set later, when the IO bitmap is inherited in

io_bitmap_share().

For paranoia sake, add a warning into tss_update_io_bitmap() to catch

the case, when that code is invoked with inconsistent state.

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached with local access to the system, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.

Weakness class

CVE-2025-38100 is classified as CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. A pointer that can be null is used without a check, crashing the process.

Affected software

CVE-2025-38100 is recorded against 3 packages.

  • debian-linux
  • kernel (from 6.13.0 up to 6.15.3)
  • linux-kernel (from 6.13 up to 6.15.3)

Timeline and source

Published on 3 July 2025 and last revised on 17 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

git.kernel.org
git.kernel.org
git.kernel.org
git.kernel.org
git.kernel.org
git.kernel.org
git.kernel.org
lists.debian.org
lists.debian.org
cert-portal.siemens.com

CVE-2025-38100 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity MEDIUM
CVSS Score 5.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CWE CWE-476
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2025-07-03
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-17

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
debian-linux
kernel 6.13.0 6.15.3
linux-kernel 6.13 6.15.3

References

Similar Threats

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in debian-linux

CVE-2025-38100 is rated CVSS 5.5 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2025