Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2025-39886 — kernel

🟡 CVSS 5.5 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit NVD
5.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

bpf: Tell memcg to use allow_spinning=false path in bpf_timer_init()

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Tell memcg to use allow_spinning=false path in bpf_timer_init()

Currently, calling bpf_map_kmalloc_node() from __bpf_async_init() can

cause various locking issues; see the following stack trace (edited for

style) as one example:

...

[10.011566] do_raw_spin_lock.cold

[10.011570] try_to_wake_up (5) double-acquiring the same

[10.011575] kick_pool rq_lock, causing a hardlockup

[10.011579] __queue_work

[10.011582] queue_work_on

[10.011585] kernfs_notify

[10.011589] cgroup_file_notify

[10.011593] try_charge_memcg (4) memcg accounting raises an

[10.011597] obj_cgroup_charge_pages MEMCG_MAX event

[10.011599] obj_cgroup_charge_account

[10.011600] __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook

[10.011603] __kmalloc_node_noprof

...

[10.011611] bpf_map_kmalloc_node

[10.011612] __bpf_async_init

[10.011615] bpf_timer_init (3) BPF calls bpf_timer_init()

[10.011617] bpf_prog_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx_fcg_runnable

[10.011619] bpf__sched_ext_ops_runnable

[10.011620] enqueue_task_scx (2) BPF runs with rq_lock held

[10.011622] enqueue_task

[10.011626] ttwu_do_activate

[10.011629] sched_ttwu_pending (1) grabs rq_lock

...

The above was reproduced on bpf-next (b338cf849ec8) by modifying

./tools/sched_ext/scx_flatcg.bpf.c to call bpf_timer_init() during

ops.runnable(), and hacking the memcg accounting code a bit to make

a bpf_timer_init() call more likely to raise an MEMCG_MAX event.

We have also run into other similar variants (both internally and on

bpf-next), including double-acquiring cgroup_file_kn_lock, the same

worker_pool::lock, etc.

As suggested by Shakeel, fix this by using __GFP_HIGH instead of

GFP_ATOMIC in __bpf_async_init(), so that e.g. if try_charge_memcg()

raises an MEMCG_MAX event, we call __memcg_memory_event() with

@allow_spinning=false and avoid calling cgroup_file_notify() there.

Depends on mm patch

"memcg: skip cgroup_file_notify if spinning is not allowed":

https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/

v0 approach s/bpf_map_kmalloc_node/bpf_mem_alloc/

https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/

v1 approach:

https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached with local access to the system, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.

Affected software

CVE-2025-39886 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • kernel (from 6.13.0 up to 6.16.8)
  • linux-kernel

Timeline and source

Published on 23 September 2025 and last revised on 12 August 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
git.kernel.org (Package)

CVE-2025-39886 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity Medium
CVSS Score 5.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CWE N/A
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2025-09-23
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-08-12

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
kernel 6.13.0 6.16.8
linux-kernel

Similar Threats

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in kernel

CVE-2025-39886 is rated CVSS 5.5 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.