🛡️ CVE-2025-62378 — commandkit

🟡 CVSS 6.1 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-706 NVD
6.1
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

CommandKit has incorrect command name exposure in context object for message command aliases

Impact

A logic flaw exists in the message command handler of CommandKit that affects how the commandName property is exposed to both middleware functions and command execution contexts when handling command aliases. When a message command is invoked using an alias, the ctx.commandName value reflects the alias rather than the canonical command name. This occurs in both middleware functions and within the command’s own run function.

Although not explicitly documented, CommandKit’s examples and guidance around middleware usage implicitly convey that ctx.commandName represents the canonical command identifier. Middleware examples in the documentation consistently use ctx.commandName to reference the command being executed, and the documentation describes middleware as suitable for “logging, authentication, permission checks, or any other cross-cutting concerns.” As a result, developers reasonably expect ctx.commandName to return the canonical command name and may rely on it for security-sensitive logic.

Developers who assume ctx.commandName is canonical may introduce unintended behavior when relying on it for logic such as permission checks, rate limiting, or audit logging. This could allow unauthorized command execution or inaccurate access control decisions. Slash commands and context menu commands are not affected.

Patches

Fixed in v1.2.0-rc.12.

ctx.commandName now consistently returns the actual canonical command name, regardless of the alias used to invoke it.

Workaround

If upgrading isn't immediately possible:

  • Use ctx.command.data.command.name for permission validations, or
  • Include all command aliases in your permission logic.

References

  • [CommandKit repository](https://github.com/underctrl-io/commandkit)
  • [Middleware documentation](https://commandkit.dev/docs/guide/commands/middlewares)

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached with local access to the system, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality low, integrity high, availability none.

Affected software

CVE-2025-62378 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • commandkit
  • unknown

Timeline and source

Published on 13 October 2025 and last revised on 16 October 2025. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)

Details

Severity Medium
CVSS Score 6.1
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
CWE CWE-706
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2025-10-13
Updated 2026-08-12
Modified 2025-10-16
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
commandkit
unknown

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in commandkit

CVE-2025-62378 is rated CVSS 6.1 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.