Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-32247 — graphiti

🟠 CVSS 8.1 — High ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-943 NVD
8.1
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Graphiti vulnerable to Cypher Injection via unsanitized node_labels in search filters

Summary

Graphiti versions before 0.28.2 contained a Cypher injection vulnerability in shared search-filter construction for non-Kuzu backends. Attacker-controlled label values supplied through SearchFilters.node_labels were concatenated directly into Cypher label expressions without validation.

In MCP deployments, this was exploitable not only through direct untrusted access to the Graphiti MCP server, but also through prompt injection against an LLM client that could be induced to call search_nodes with attacker-controlled entity_types values. The MCP server mapped entity_types to SearchFilters.node_labels, which then reached the vulnerable Cypher construction path.

Affected backends included Neo4j, FalkorDB, and Neptune. Kuzu was not affected by the label-injection issue because it used parameterized label handling rather than string-interpolated Cypher labels.

This issue was mitigated in 0.28.2.

Affected Versions

  • 0.28.1 and earlier

Fixed Version

  • 0.28.2

Affected Components

  • Graphiti Core search filter construction
  • Graphiti MCP Server search_nodes when used by an LLM client processing untrusted prompts

Technical Details

Before 0.28.2, Graphiti joined SearchFilters.node_labels with | and inserted the result directly into Cypher label expressions in the shared search-filter constructors used by non-Kuzu providers.

The vulnerable logic was effectively:

  • node_labels = '|'.join(filters.node_labels)
  • node_label_filter = 'n:' + node_labels

The same pattern was also used in edge-search filter construction.

In MCP deployments, search_nodes accepted an entity_types argument and passed it directly to SearchFilters(node_labels=entity_types). An attacker who could influence prompts processed by an LLM client with Graphiti MCP access could use prompt injection to steer the model into invoking search_nodes with crafted entity_types values containing Cypher syntax. Those values would then be interpolated into Cypher before 0.28.2.

Impact

Successful exploitation could allow arbitrary Cypher execution within the privileges of the configured graph database connection, including:

  • reading graph data outside the intended search scope
  • modifying graph data
  • deleting graph data
  • bypassing logical group isolation enforced at the query layer

Additional Note on group_ids

Separately, the original report also identified a narrower issue in fulltext search query construction for unvalidated group_ids. That issue was distinct from the Cypher label-injection path described above and was also mitigated in 0.28.2.

Mitigation

Upgrade to 0.28.2 or later.

Version 0.28.2 added:

  • validation of SearchFilters.node_labels
  • defense-in-depth label validation in shared search-filter constructors
  • validation of entity node labels in persistence query builders
  • validation of group_ids in shared search fulltext helpers

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately:

  • do not expose Graphiti MCP tools to untrusted users or to LLM workflows that process untrusted prompt content
  • avoid passing untrusted values into SearchFilters.node_labels or MCP entity_types
  • restrict graph database credentials to the minimum privileges required

Credits

@4n93L for their original report.

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: Low — an ordinary user account is enough.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-32247 is classified as CWE-943: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic. The product generates a query intended to access or manipulate data in a data store such as a database, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that can modify the intended logic of the query.

Affected software

CVE-2026-32247 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • graphiti (fixed in 0.28.2)
  • graphiti-core (fixed in 0.28.2)

Timeline and source

Published on 12 March 2026 and last revised on 17 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com

Other advisories for this package

graphiti has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-943: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic) in other software:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.1
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CWE CWE-943
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-03-12
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-17

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
graphiti 0.28.2
graphiti-core 0.28.2

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is graphiti part of your stack?

CVE-2026-32247 is rated CVSS 8.1 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026