Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-32758 — filebrowser

🟡 CVSS 6.5 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-22 NVD
6.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

File Browser has an Access Rule Bypass via Path Traversal in Copy/Rename Destination Parameter

Description

The resourcePatchHandler in http/resource.go validates the destination path against configured access rules before the path is cleaned/normalized. The rules engine (rules/rules.go) uses literal string prefix matching (strings.HasPrefix) or regex matching against the raw path. The actual file operation (fileutils.Copy, patchAction) subsequently calls path.Clean() which resolves .. sequences, producing a different effective path than the one validated.

This allows an authenticated user with Create or Rename permissions to bypass administrator-configured deny rules by including .. (dot-dot) path traversal sequences in the destination query parameter of a PATCH request.

Steps to Reproduce

1. Verify the rule works normally

```bash

# This should return 403 Forbidden

curl -X PATCH \

-H "X-Auth: <alice_jwt>" \

"http://host/api/resources/public/test.txt?action=copy&destination=%2Frestricted%2Fcopied.txt"

```

2. Exploit the bypass

```bash

# This should succeed despite the deny rule

curl -X PATCH \

-H "X-Auth: <alice_jwt>" \

"http://host/api/resources/public/test.txt?action=copy&destination=%2Fpublic%2F..%2Frestricted%2Fcopied.txt"

```

3. Result

The file test.txt is copied to /restricted/copied.txt despite the deny rule for /restricted/.

Root Cause Analysis

In http/resource.go:209-257:

```go

dst := r.URL.Query().Get("destination") // line 212

dst, err := url.QueryUnescape(dst) // line 214 — dst contains ".."

if !d.Check(src) || !d.Check(dst) { // line 215 — CHECK ON UNCLEANED PATH

return http.StatusForbidden, nil

}

```

In rules/rules.go:29-35:

```go

func (r *Rule) Matches(path string) bool {

if r.Regex {

return r.Regexp.MatchString(path) // regex on literal path

}

return strings.HasPrefix(path, r.Path) // prefix on literal path

}

```

In fileutils/copy.go:12-17:

```go

func Copy(afs afero.Fs, src, dst string, ...) error {

if dst = path.Clean("/" + dst); dst == "" { // CLEANING HAPPENS HERE, AFTER CHECK

return os.ErrNotExist

}

```

The rules check sees /public/../restricted/copied.txt (no match for /restricted/ prefix).

The file operation resolves it to /restricted/copied.txt (within the restricted path).

Secondary Issue

In the same handler, the error from url.QueryUnescape is checked after d.Check() runs (lines 214-220), meaning the rules check executes on a potentially malformed string if unescaping fails.

Impact

An authenticated user with Copy (Create) or Rename permission can write or move files into any path within their scope that is protected by deny rules. This bypasses both:

  • Prefix-based rules: strings.HasPrefix on uncleaned path misses the match
  • Regex-based rules: Standard patterns like ^/restricted/.* fail on uncleaned path

Cannot be used to:

  • Escape the user's BasePathFs scope (afero prevents this)
  • Read from restricted paths (GET handler uses cleaned r.URL.Path)

Suggested Fix

Clean the destination path before the rules check:

```go

dst, err := url.QueryUnescape(dst)

if err != nil {

return errToStatus(err), err

}

dst = path.Clean("/" + dst)

src = path.Clean("/" + src)

if !d.Check(src) || !d.Check(dst) {

return http.StatusForbidden, nil

}

if dst == "/" || src == "/" {

return http.StatusForbidden, nil

}

```

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity high, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: Low — an ordinary user account is enough.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: None.
  • Integrity impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-32758 is classified as CWE-22: Path Traversal. A file path built from user input is not confined to the intended directory, letting an attacker reach files elsewhere on the filesystem.

Affected software

CVE-2026-32758 is recorded against 3 packages.

  • filebrowser (fixed in 2.62.0)
  • github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
  • github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2

Timeline and source

Published on 20 March 2026 and last revised on 17 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com
github.com
github.com

Other advisories for this package

filebrowser has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-22: Path Traversal) in other software:

Details

Severity MEDIUM
CVSS Score 6.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CWE CWE-22
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-03-20
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-17

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
filebrowser 2.62.0
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2

Similar Threats

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in filebrowser

CVE-2026-32758 is rated CVSS 6.5 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026