🛡️ CVE-2026-33544 — tinyauth
Description
Tinyauth has OAuth account confusion via shared mutable state on singleton service instances
Summary
All three OAuth service implementations (GenericOAuthService, GithubOAuthService, GoogleOAuthService) store PKCE verifiers and access tokens as mutable struct fields on singleton instances shared across all concurrent requests. When two users initiate OAuth login for the same provider concurrently, a race condition between VerifyCode() and Userinfo() causes one user to receive a session with the other user's identity.
Details
The [OAuthBrokerService.GetService()](https://github.com/steveiliop56/tinyauth/blob/592b7ded24959013f8af63ab9930254c752c8c8e/internal/service/oauth_broker_service.go#L70-L72) returns a single shared instance per provider for every request. The OAuth flow stores intermediate state as struct fields on this singleton:
Token storage — [generic_oauth_service.go line 96](https://github.com/steveiliop56/tinyauth/blob/592b7ded24959013f8af63ab9930254c752c8c8e/internal/service/generic_oauth_service.go#L96):
```go
generic.token = token // Shared mutable field on singleton
```
Verifier storage — [generic_oauth_service.go line 81](https://github.com/steveiliop56/tinyauth/blob/592b7ded24959013f8af63ab9930254c752c8c8e/internal/service/generic_oauth_service.go#L81):
```go
generic.verifier = verifier // Shared mutable field on singleton
```
In the callback handler [oauth_controller.go lines 136–143](https://github.com/steveiliop56/tinyauth/blob/592b7ded24959013f8af63ab9930254c752c8c8e/internal/controller/oauth_controller.go#L136-L143), the code calls:
```go
err = service.VerifyCode(code) // line 136 — stores token on singleton
// ... race window ...
user, err := controller.broker.GetUser(req.Provider) // line 143 — reads token from singleton
```
Between these two calls, a concurrent request's VerifyCode() can overwrite the token field, causing GetUser() → Userinfo() to fetch the wrong user's identity claims.
The same pattern exists in all three implementations:
- [
github_oauth_service.golines 34–39, 77, 86–99](https://github.com/steveiliop56/tinyauth/blob/592b7ded24959013f8af63ab9930254c752c8c8e/internal/service/github_oauth_service.go#L34-L39) - [
google_oauth_service.golines 22–27, 65, 73–87](https://github.com/steveiliop56/tinyauth/blob/592b7ded24959013f8af63ab9930254c752c8c8e/internal/service/google_oauth_service.go#L22-L27)
PoC
Race scenario (two concurrent OAuth callbacks):
1. User A and User B both click "Login with GitHub" on the same tinyauth instance
2. Both are redirected to GitHub, authorize, and GitHub redirects both back with authorization codes
3. Both callbacks arrive at tinyauth nearly simultaneously:
```
Timeline:
t0: Request A → service.VerifyCode(codeA) → singleton.token = tokenA
t1: Request B → service.VerifyCode(codeB) → singleton.token = tokenB (overwrites tokenA)
t2: Request A → broker.GetUser("github") → Userinfo() reads singleton.token = tokenB
t3: Request A receives User B's identity (email, name, groups)
```
User A now has a tinyauth session with User B's email, gaining access to all resources User B is authorized for via tinyauth's ACL.
PKCE verifier DoS variant: Even with PKCE, concurrent oauthURLHandler calls overwrite the verifier field, causing VerifyCode() to send the wrong verifier to the OAuth provider, which rejects the exchange.
Static verification: Run Go's race detector on a test that calls VerifyCode and Userinfo concurrently on the same service instance — the -race flag will flag data races on the token and verifier fields.
Go race detector confirmation: Running a concurrent test with go test -race on the singleton service detects 4 data races on the token and verifier fields. Without the race detector, measured token overwrite rate is 99.9% (9,985/10,000 iterations).
Test environment: tinyauth v5.0.4, commit 592b7ded, Go race detector + source code analysis
Impact
An attacker who times their OAuth callback to race with a victim's callback can obtain a tinyauth session with the victim's identity. This grants unauthorized access to all resources the victim is permitted to access through tinyauth's ACL system. The probability of collision increases with concurrent OAuth traffic.
The PKCE verifier overwrite additionally causes a denial-of-service: concurrent OAuth logins for the same provider reliably fail.
Suggested Fix
Pass verifier and token through method parameters or return values instead of storing them on the singleton:
```go
func (generic *GenericOAuthService) VerifyCode(code string, verifier string) (*oauth2.Token, error) {
return generic.config.Exchange(generic.context, code, oauth2.VerifierOption(verifier))
}
func (generic *GenericOAuthService) Userinfo(token *oauth2.Token) (config.Claims, error) {
client := generic.config.Client(generic.context, token)
// ...
}
```
Store
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. A user must be tricked into taking some action. The scope is changed, meaning a successful attack can affect components beyond the vulnerable one. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability none.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-33544 is classified as CWE-362: Race Condition. Concurrent operations share state without proper synchronisation, so timing decides whether the result is correct.
Affected software
CVE-2026-33544 is recorded against 2 packages.
- github.com/steveiliop56/tinyauth
- tinyauth (fixed in 5.0.5)
Timeline and source
Published on 1 April 2026 and last revised on 25 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.
References
github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/steveiliop56/tinyauth | — | — |
| tinyauth | — | 5.0.5 |
References
Similar Threats
- Medium CVE-2026-32245
- High CVE-2026-32246
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Site Security Check
Is tinyauth part of your stack?
CVE-2026-33544 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.