Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-44328 — free5gc

🟠 CVSS 8.2 — High ⚠️ Exploit Public CWE-306 NVD
8.2
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

free5GC's SMF UPI DELETE /upi/v1/upNodesLinks/{ref} panics on AN-node deletion via nil UPF dereference; unauthenticated, state-mutating

Summary

free5GC's SMF mounts the UPI management route group without inbound OAuth2 middleware (same root cause as the broader UPI auth gap reported in free5gc/free5gc#887). On top of that, the DELETE /upi/v1/upNodesLinks/{upNodeRef} handler unconditionally dereferences upNode.UPF after the type-guarded async release, even though AN-typed nodes are constructed without a UPF object. As a result, a single unauthenticated DELETE /upi/v1/upNodesLinks/gNB1 request crashes the handler with a nil-pointer panic AND mutates the in-memory user-plane topology before panicking (the UpNodeDelete(upNodeRef) line runs first). This is an unauthenticated, state-mutating panic-DoS sink that an off-path network attacker can trigger by name against any AN entry.

Details

Validated against the SMF container in the official Docker compose lab.

  • Source repo tag: v4.2.1
  • Running Docker image: free5gc/smf:v4.2.1
  • Runtime SMF commit: 8385c00a
  • Docker validation date: 2026-03-22 local (container log timestamp 2026-03-21T23:43:17Z)
  • SMF endpoint: http://10.100.200.6:8000

Control comparison on the same SMF instance:

  • GET /nsmf-oam/v1/ (no token) -> 401 Unauthorized
  • DELETE /upi/v1/upNodesLinks/gNB1 (no token) -> 500 Internal Server Error (panic)

The sibling nsmf-oam returning 401 proves OAuth middleware IS wired in for other SMF route groups; the UPI group specifically is mounted without it.

Vulnerable handler logic (paths in free5gc/smf):

```go

// NFs/smf/internal/sbi/api_upi.go:94..99

if upNode.Type == smf_context.UPNODE_UPF {

go s.Processor().ReleaseAllResourcesOfUPF(upNode.UPF)

}

upi.UpNodeDelete(upNodeRef)

upNode.UPF.CancelAssociation() // <-- panics for AN-typed nodes; nil UPF

```

The Type == UPNODE_UPF guard only protects the asynchronous ReleaseAllResourcesOfUPF call. After that, UpNodeDelete(upNodeRef) runs unconditionally (so the topology mutation lands first), and then upNode.UPF.CancelAssociation() is called unconditionally on a *UPF that is nil for AN nodes by construction.

Code evidence:

  • UPI group mounted WITHOUT auth middleware:
  • NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:76
  • NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:78
  • Protected control comparison (other SMF groups DO use auth):
  • NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:99
  • NFs/smf/internal/sbi/server.go:105
  • Delete handler (panic site):
  • NFs/smf/internal/sbi/api_upi.go:94
  • NFs/smf/internal/sbi/api_upi.go:99
  • AN nodes are constructed without a UPF object (root cause of the nil deref):
  • NFs/smf/internal/context/user_plane_information.go:95
  • NFs/smf/internal/context/user_plane_information.go:97

PoC

Reproduced end-to-end against the running SMF at http://10.100.200.6:8000.

1. Control: protected sibling OAM route returns 401:

```

curl -i http://10.100.200.6:8000/nsmf-oam/v1/

```

```

HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized

```

2. Trigger: unauthenticated DELETE on the default AN node gNB1:

```

curl -i -X DELETE http://10.100.200.6:8000/upi/v1/upNodesLinks/gNB1

```

```

HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error

```

3. SMF container logs (docker logs --tail 120 smf) show topology mutation landing BEFORE the panic, and the panic stack pointing at api_upi.go:99:

```

[INFO][SMF][Init] UPNode [gNB1] found. Deleting it.

[INFO][SMF][Init] Delete UPLink [UPF] <=> [gNB1].

[ERRO][SMF][GIN] panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference

github.com/free5gc/smf/internal/sbi.(*Server).DeleteUpNodeLink

/go/src/free5gc/NFs/smf/internal/sbi/api_upi.go:99 +0x298

[INFO][SMF][GIN] | 500 | DELETE | /upi/v1/upNodesLinks/gNB1

```

The lab state was manually restored after validation by re-creating the AN entry; that POST is restoration-only and is NOT a mitigation.

Impact

Three compounding defects on the same SMF SBI surface:

1. Missing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the UPI route group, so the trigger is reachable to any off-path network attacker who can reach SMF on the SBI -- no token, no session, no UE state needed. The same-instance nsmf-oam returning 401 proves the middleware is wired in elsewhere and only missing on UPI.

2. NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476) in DeleteUpNodeLink: the Type == UPNODE_UPF guard only covers the async release call, then upNode.UPF.CancelAssociation() runs unconditionally on AN-typed nodes that have a nil UPF field by construction.

3. Order of operations (CWE-755 / CWE-754): UpNodeDelete(upNodeRef) mutates the in-memory user-plane topology BEFORE the dereference panics, so the topology change lands even though the request returns 500. This makes the bug state-mutating, not just a plain panic.

Any party that can reach SMF on the SBI can:

  • Delete arbitrary named entries (e.g. gNB1) from SMF's in-memory user-plane topology anonymously via a single `DELETE /upi/v1/

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity low, availability high.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: None — an unauthenticated stranger can try it.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: None.
  • Integrity impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.
  • Availability impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-44328 is classified as CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function. A sensitive function can be reached without authenticating at all.

Affected software

CVE-2026-44328 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • free5gc (fixed in 4.2.2)
  • github.com/free5gc/smf

Timeline and source

Published on 27 May 2026 and last revised on 17 June 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com
github.com

Other advisories for this package

free5gc has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function) in other software:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.2
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
CWE CWE-306
Public Exploit ⚠️ Yes
Source NVD
Published 2026-05-27
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-17

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
free5gc 4.2.2
github.com/free5gc/smf

Similar Threats

Exploit Protection

Are you running free5gc?

CVE-2026-44328 carries CVSS 8.2 High rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.

Check My Site For CVE-2026-44328 →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026