🛡️ CVE-2026-44502 — bugsink
Description
Bunsink has an SSRF bypass in validate_webhook_url
Summary
Bugsink’s webhook URL validation in versions 2.1.2 and earlier could be (partially) bypassed because of a mismatch in URL parsing.
In some malformed URLs, Python’s standard URL parser (urllib) and the HTTP client stack (requests / urllib3) do not agree on which host is actually being targeted. That could allow a webhook URL to pass Bugsink’s outbound-host checks while the actual HTTP request is sent somewhere else.
Impact
This issue affects Bugsink’s outbound webhook integrations.
An attacker who can supply or influence a webhook URL may be able to make Bugsink send an outbound HTTP POST request to a host that should have been blocked by the webhook validation logic, including loopback,
private, or otherwise non-allowlisted destinations.
The practical impact is limited:
- this is an outbound webhook SSRF issue, not a general-purpose proxy
- Bugsink does not follow redirects for these webhook requests
- the request shape is constrained by how the malformed URL is normalized by the HTTP client
- this does not give arbitrary control over every possible request path
In other words, this is a real validation bypass, but it is narrower than a full arbitrary-request primitive.
Technical Details
The original validation logic parsed webhook URLs with Python’s urllib.parse.urlparse, then sent the request with requests.post.
For malformed inputs involving backslashes and @, those components can disagree about where the authority ends and which hostname is the real target. A URL may therefore appear to target an allowlisted public
hostname during validation, while the HTTP client actually connects to a different host.
Fix
The fix has two parts:
1. Bugsink now normalizes webhook URLs using the same HTTP client stack that will later send them, and applies validation to that normalized form.
2. Bugsink now outright rejects raw webhook URLs containing characters outside the RFC URL character set, rather than relying on downstream normalization of malformed input.
Together, these changes remove the parser discrepancy and make webhook URL handling stricter and more predictable.
Workarounds
If users cannot upgrade immediately:
- restrict who can configure or modify webhook URLs
- review existing webhook configurations for malformed or unusual URLs
- prefer tightly controlled outbound network policy at the deployment level
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality low, integrity none, availability none.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-44502 is classified as CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The server fetches a URL supplied by the caller, which can be pointed at internal systems it alone can reach.
Affected software
CVE-2026-44502 is recorded against 2 packages.
- bugsink (fixed in 2.1.3)
- unknown
Timeline and source
Published on 8 May 2026 and last revised on 13 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.
References
github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| bugsink | — | 2.1.3 |
| unknown | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- Unknown GHSA-5x67-j5xg-c5gj
- Unknown CVE-2026-53954
- Low CVE-2026-47715
- Low CVE-2026-47716
- Medium CVE-2026-47728
Vulnerability Monitoring
Track new vulnerabilities in bugsink
CVE-2026-44502 is rated CVSS 4.3 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.
Set Up Free Alerts →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.