Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-44843 — langchain

🟠 CVSS 8.2 — High ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-502 NVD
8.2
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

LangChain vulnerable to unsafe deserialization of attacker-controlled objects through overly broad load() allowlists

LangChain contains older runtime code paths that deserialize run inputs, run outputs, or other application-controlled payloads using overly broad object allowlists. These paths may call load() with allowed_objects="all". This does not enable arbitrary Python object deserialization, but it does allow any trusted LangChain-serializable object to be revived, which is broader than these runtime paths require. As a result, attacker-supplied LangChain serialized constructor dictionaries may cause trusted runtime paths to instantiate classes with untrusted constructor arguments.

Applications are exposed only when all of the following are true:

1. The application accepts untrusted structured input, such as JSON, from a user or network request.

2. The application does not validate or canonicalize that input into an inert schema before invoking LangChain.

3. Attacker-controlled nested dictionaries or lists are preserved in LangChain run inputs or outputs.

4. The application uses an affected API path that later deserializes that run data.

Known affected runtime surfaces include:

  • RunnableWithMessageHistory
  • astream_log()
  • astream_events(version="v1")

Related unsafe deserialization patterns may also affect applications that explicitly load serialized LangChain prompt or runnable objects from untrusted sources, including shared prompt stores, Hub artifacts with model configuration, or other application-controlled serialization stores.

Applications that validate incoming requests against a fixed schema, such as coercing user input to a plain string or message-content field before invoking LangChain, are unlikely to expose this deserialization primitive.

This release also fixes a related secret-marker validation bypass in the serialization and deserialization layer (_is_lc_secret). That issue creates an additional path by which attacker-controlled constructor dictionaries can avoid escaping during dumps() -> loads() round-trips and reach LangChain object revival logic.

Impact

An attacker who can submit untrusted structured input to an affected application, and have that structure preserved in LangChain run data, may be able to inject LangChain serialized constructor payloads such as:

```json

{

"lc": 1,

"type": "constructor",

"id": ["langchain_core", "messages", "ai", "AIMessage"],

"kwargs": {"content": "attacker-controlled content"}

}

```

If this payload reaches a broad load() call, LangChain may instantiate the referenced class instead of treating the payload as inert user data.

Realistic impacts include:

  • Persistent chat-history poisoning when revived AIMessage, HumanMessage, or SystemMessage objects are stored by RunnableWithMessageHistory.
  • Prompt injection or behavior manipulation if attacker-controlled messages are later included in model context.
  • Instantiation of unexpected trusted LangChain objects with attacker-controlled constructor arguments.
  • Possible credential disclosure or server-side requests if a reachable object reads environment credentials, creates clients, or contacts attacker-controlled endpoints during initialization.
  • Additional prompt-template or runnable-configuration impacts in applications that separately load and execute untrusted serialized LangChain objects.

Remediation

LangChain will deprecate the affected APIs as part of this fix:

  • RunnableWithMessageHistory
  • astream_log()
  • astream_events(version="v1")

These are older code paths that are no longer recommended for new applications. They were not previously marked as deprecated, but recent LangChain documentation has primarily directed users toward newer streaming and memory patterns, including the stream API. Applications should migrate to the currently recommended APIs rather than continue depending on these older surfaces.

Separately, LangChain will update load() and loads() to tighten deserialization behavior so broad object revival is not applied implicitly to untrusted or application-controlled payloads. The older runtime surfaces listed above are being deprecated rather than preserved as supported paths for broad runtime deserialization.

This release also fixes a related secret-marker validation bypass in the serialization and deserialization layer (_is_lc_secret). That issue creates an additional path by which attacker-controlled constructor dictionaries can avoid escaping during dumps() -> loads() round-trips and reach LangChain object revival logic.

Guidance for load() and loads()

load() and loads() should be used only with trusted LangChain manifests or serialized objects from trusted storage. Do not pass user-controlled data to load() or loads(), and do not use them as general parsers for request bodies, tool inputs, chat messages, or other attacker-controlled data.

load() and loads() are beta APIs, and

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity low, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: None — an unauthenticated stranger can try it.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-44843 is classified as CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data. Serialised data from an untrusted source is reconstructed into objects, which can trigger code during the process.

Affected software

CVE-2026-44843 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • langchain (from 1.0.0 up to 1.3.3)
  • langchain-core (fixed in 0.3.85)

Timeline and source

Published on 26 May 2026 and last revised on 24 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com

Other advisories for this package

langchain has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data) in other software:

CVE-2026-44843 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.2
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CWE CWE-502
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-05-26
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-07-24
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
langchain 1.0.0 1.3.3
langchain-core 0.3.85

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is langchain part of your stack?

CVE-2026-44843 is rated CVSS 8.2 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026