Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-45134 — langchain

🟠 CVSS 8.0 — High ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-502 NVD
8.0
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

LangSmith SDK: Public prompt pull deserializes untrusted manifests without trust boundary warning

Description

The LangSmith SDK's prompt pull methods (pull_prompt / pull_prompt_commit in Python, pullPrompt / pullPromptCommit in JS/TS) fetch and deserialize prompt manifests from the LangSmith Hub. These manifests may contain serialized LangChain objects and model configuration that affect runtime behavior. When pulling a public prompt by owner/name identifier, the manifest content is controlled by an external party, but prior versions of the SDK did not distinguish this from pulling a prompt within the caller's own organization.

Prompt manifests can intentionally configure a model with a custom base URL, default headers, model name, or other constructor arguments. These are supported features, but they also mean the prompt contents should be treated as executable configuration rather than plain text. A prompt can also include serialized LangChain Runnable or PromptTemplate objects with attacker-controlled constructor kwargs, or secret references that, if secrets_from_env is enabled, read environment variables at deserialization time.

Applications are exposed when all of the following are true:

  • The application calls pull_prompt or pull_prompt_commit (Python) or pullPrompt or pullPromptCommit (JS/TS) with a public owner/name prompt identifier.
  • The prompt was published or modified by an untrusted or compromised account.
  • The application uses the pulled prompt without independently validating its contents.

Applications that only pull prompts from their own organization (referenced by name only, without an owner/ prefix) are not affected by the public prompt trust boundary issue described above. However, same-organization prompts carry their own risk. If an attacker gains write access to the organization (for example, through a leaked LANGSMITH_API_KEY or a compromised team member account), they can push a malicious prompt that is pulled and deserialized without any additional warning.

Impact

An attacker who publishes a malicious prompt to LangSmith Hub may be able to affect applications that pull that prompt by owner/name. If the prompt manifest reaches the SDK's deserialization path, the SDK will instantiate the referenced LangChain objects with the attacker-supplied constructor arguments rather than treating the manifest as inert data.

Realistic impacts include:

  • Server-side request forgery (SSRF), outbound request redirection, and interception of LLM traffic if a prompt manifest configures an LLM client with an attacker-controlled base_url, proxy, or equivalent endpoint-setting parameter. In typical deployments, redirected requests may include prompt contents, system prompts, retrieved context, model parameters, provider credentials, or other secrets and may disclose them to the attacker-controlled endpoint.
  • Prompt injection or behavior manipulation if a manifest embeds attacker-controlled system messages, prompt templates, or model parameters that alter the application's behavior.
  • Additional deserialization risk when include_model=True is passed, because this expands the allowlist to partner integration classes. This is not the default, but it materially increases risk when pulling prompts from outside the caller's organization.

Remediation

The LangSmith SDK now blocks pulling public prompts by owner/name by default. Callers must explicitly opt in by passing dangerously_pull_public_prompt=True (Python) or dangerouslyPullPublicPrompt: true (JS/TS) to acknowledge the trust boundary. This flag should only be set after reviewing and trusting the prompt contents, not merely the publishing account.

Upgrade to LangSmith SDK Python >= 0.8.0 or JS/TS >= 0.6.0.

Guidance for prompt pull methods

The prompt pull methods (pull_prompt / pull_prompt_commit in Python, pullPrompt / pullPromptCommit in JS/TS) should be used only with trusted prompts. Do not pull public prompts by owner/name from untrusted or unreviewed sources without understanding that the manifest contents will be deserialized and may affect runtime behavior.

When pulling prompts that include model configuration (include_model=True in Python, includeModel: true in JS/TS), the deserialization allowlist expands to include partner integration classes. Because this mode is not the default and is often unnecessary for third-party prompts, prefer the default (false) when pulling prompts from sources outside your organization.

Avoid passing secrets_from_env=True (Python) when pulling untrusted prompts. This parameter allows prompt manifests to read environment variables during deserialization. Only use it with trusted prompts from your own organization.

Same-organization prompts

Prompts pulled from the caller's own organization (referenced by name only, without an owner/ prefix) are not gated by the new dangerously_pull_public_prompt flag, but they a

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. A user must be tricked into taking some action. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity low, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: None — an unauthenticated stranger can try it.
  • User interaction: Required — someone has to click, open or visit something.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-45134 is classified as CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data. Serialised data from an untrusted source is reconstructed into objects, which can trigger code during the process.

Affected software

CVE-2026-45134 is recorded against 4 packages.

  • langchain (fixed in 0.3.30)
  • langchain-classic (fixed in 1.0.7)
  • langsmith
  • unknown

Timeline and source

Published on 13 May 2026 and last revised on 13 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Package)

Other advisories for this package

langchain has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data) in other software:

CVE-2026-45134 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.0
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CWE CWE-502
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-05-13
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-07-13
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
langchain 0.3.30
langchain-classic 1.0.7
langsmith
unknown

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is langchain part of your stack?

CVE-2026-45134 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026