🛡️ CVE-2026-45920 — kernel

🟠 CVSS 7.8 — High ✅ No Known Exploit NVD
7.8
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown

fstests test generic/388 occasionally reproduces a warning in

ext4_put_super() associated with the dirty clusters count:

WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 76064 at fs/ext4/super.c:1324 ext4_put_super+0x48c/0x590 [ext4]

Tracing the failure shows that the warning fires due to an

s_dirtyclusters_counter value of -1. IOW, this appears to be a

spurious decrement as opposed to some sort of leak. Further tracing

of the dirty cluster count deltas and an LLM scan of the resulting

output identified the cause as a double decrement in the error path

between ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() and the caller

ext4_mb_new_blocks().

First, note that generic/388 is a shutdown vs. fsstress test and so

produces a random set of operations and shutdown injections. In the

problematic case, the shutdown triggers an error return from the

ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() call(s) made from

ext4_mb_mark_context(). The changed value is non-zero at this point,

so ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() does not exit after the error

bubbles up from ext4_mb_mark_context(). Instead, the former

decrements both cluster counters and returns the error up to

ext4_mb_new_blocks(). The latter falls into the !ar->len out path

which decrements the dirty clusters counter a second time, creating

the inconsistency.

To avoid this problem and simplify ownership of the cluster

reservation in this codepath, lift the counter reduction to a single

place in the caller. This makes it more clear that

ext4_mb_new_blocks() is responsible for acquiring cluster

reservation (via ext4_claim_free_clusters()) in the !delalloc case

as well as releasing it, regardless of whether it ends up consumed

or returned due to failure.

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached with local access to the system, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability high.

Affected software

CVE-2026-45920 is recorded against 3 packages.

  • kernel (from 6.19.0 up to 6.19.4)
  • linux-kernel (from 6.19 up to 6.19.4)
  • unknown

Timeline and source

Published on 27 May 2026 and last revised on 28 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
git.kernel.org (Web)
github.com (Advisory)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
git.kernel.org (Package)

CVE-2026-45920 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity High
CVSS Score 7.8
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE N/A
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-05-27
Updated 2026-08-12
Modified 2026-07-28

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
kernel 6.19.0 6.19.4
linux-kernel 6.19 6.19.4
unknown

References

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is kernel part of your stack?

CVE-2026-45920 is rated CVSS 7.8 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.