🛡️ CVE-2026-47412 — praisonai-platform
Description
praisonai-platform: Any workspace member can delete the entire workspace via DELETE /workspaces/{id}
Summary
Type: Authorization bypass enabling destructive action. The DELETE /workspaces/{workspace_id} endpoint is gated only by require_workspace_member(workspace_id) (default min_role="member"). Any member of the workspace can issue a single DELETE to wipe the entire workspace, including every project, issue, comment, agent, label, and member record (cascading via the foreign-key relationships). There is no owner-role gate, no confirmation token, no soft-delete window, no recovery path.
File: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 77-86; services/workspace_service.py's delete() method.
Root cause: the route uses Depends(require_workspace_member) which defaults to min_role="member" and is never overridden. The service method WorkspaceService.delete(workspace_id) performs the destructive operation without any caller-permission verification. The role hierarchy (MemberService.has_role, member_service.py:80-96) is implemented but unused for this endpoint.
Affected Code
File: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 77-86.
```python
@router.delete("/{workspace_id}", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)
async def delete_workspace(
workspace_id: str,
user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member), # <-- BUG: defaults to min_role="member"
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
ws_svc = WorkspaceService(session)
deleted = await ws_svc.delete(workspace_id) # <-- destructive, no role check
if not deleted:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Workspace not found")
```
Why it's wrong: workspace deletion is the most destructive single action in this product — it wipes every member, project, issue, comment, agent, and label belonging to the tenant. The standard convention is to gate this on owner role, ideally with a confirmation parameter (typed workspace name) and a recovery window. This endpoint does none of that. The require_workspace_member(min_role) parameter exists precisely for this kind of tightening but is never invoked with anything other than the default.
Exploit Chain
1. Attacker is a member of workspace W (joined via invite, signup default, or any other route into membership). State: attacker holds JWT with Member(workspace_id=W, user_id=attacker, role="member").
2. Attacker sends DELETE /workspaces/W with Authorization: Bearer <attacker_jwt>. State: control flow enters delete_workspace.
3. require_workspace_member(W, attacker) passes (attacker is a member, default min_role="member" satisfied). WorkspaceService.delete(W) removes the workspace row; SQLAlchemy cascade rules drop every related row (members, projects, issues, comments, agents, labels). State: workspace W no longer exists.
4. Final state: a low-privilege member has wiped the workspace. The legitimate owner has no recovery: no soft-delete, no audit-trail event for the deletion (the Activity log row would have been deleted too as part of the cascade). The same primitive at scale (script that DELETEs every workspace_id the attacker can enumerate) becomes a multi-tenant griefing tool.
Security Impact
Severity: sec-high. CVSS 8.1: network attack, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, scope unchanged, no confidentiality (just destruction), high integrity (every workspace child row wiped), high availability (workspace gone for legitimate owner).
Attacker capability: with one workspace-member token plus one DELETE request, the attacker irreversibly deletes the workspace and every child resource. The deletion is silent and immediate.
Preconditions: praisonai-platform is deployed multi-tenant; the attacker has any membership token in the target workspace.
Differential: source-inspection-verified. The asymmetry between require_workspace_member's clearly-tunable min_role parameter and this endpoint's use of the default value confirms the gap. With the suggested fix below, member-tier tokens fail the gate at the dependency, the destructive action never reaches the service layer, and the endpoint returns 403 instead of 204.
Suggested Fix
```diff
--- a/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py
+++ b/src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py
@@ -75,11 +75,15 @@
+def _require_workspace_owner(workspace_id: str, user, session):
+ return require_workspace_member(workspace_id, user, session, min_role="owner")
+
@router.delete("/{workspace_id}", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT)
async def delete_workspace(
workspace_id: str,
- user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member),
+ user: AuthIdentity = Depends(_require_workspace_owner),
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
ws_svc = WorkspaceService(session
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity high, availability high.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-47412 is classified as CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management. Privileges are assigned, dropped or restored incorrectly, leaving an actor with more access than intended.
Affected software
CVE-2026-47412 is recorded against 2 packages.
- praisonai-platform (fixed in 0.1.4)
- unknown
Timeline and source
Published on 1 June 2026 and last revised on 13 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.
References
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| praisonai-platform | — | 0.1.4 |
| unknown | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- High CVE-2026-57121
- Critical CVE-2026-57147
- Critical CVE-2026-57148
- High CVE-2026-47419
- Medium CVE-2026-47411
Site Security Check
Is praisonai-platform part of your stack?
CVE-2026-47412 is rated CVSS 8.1 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.