🛡️ CVE-2026-48815 — sigstore
Description
sigstore's certificateOIDs verification constraints are silently dropped and never enforced
Summary
The documented certificateOIDs option in sigstore.verify() is accepted by the public API but discarded before verification, so required certificate extension OIDs are never checked.
Details
The public verify options include certificateOIDs and the documentation says those OID/value pairs “must be present in the certificate’s extension list.” The policy-construction path used by sigstore.verify() and createVerifier() only copies the SAN and issuer settings into the verification policy and completely ignores certificateOIDs.
As a result, callers can believe they are constraining verification to certificates carrying specific Fulcio or workload-identifying OIDs, while the actual verifier never receives those constraints. Any bundle that satisfies the remaining checks is accepted even if the required OID extensions are absent or mismatched.
This is reachable from supported usage through the documented certificateOIDs verify option.
PoC
```javascript
const { createVerificationPolicy } = require("sigstore/dist/config");
const policy = createVerificationPolicy({
certificateIssuer: "https://issuer.example",
certificateIdentityEmail: "[email protected]",
certificateOIDs: {
"1.2.3.4": "required-value",
},
});
console.log("certificateOIDs" in policy, JSON.stringify(policy));
// false {"subjectAlternativeName":"[email protected]","extensions":{"issuer":"https://issuer.example"}}
```
Impact
Applications that rely on certificateOIDs to restrict which certificates may sign artifacts receive no such protection. Unauthorized certificates that should be rejected on extension policy can be accepted as long as they satisfy the remaining verification checks.
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity high, availability none.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-48815 is classified as CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature. A signature is not checked correctly, so forged or modified content is accepted as genuine.
Affected software
CVE-2026-48815 is recorded against 2 packages.
- sigstore
- unknown
Timeline and source
Published on 1 July 2026 and last revised on 4 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.
References
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| sigstore | — | — |
| unknown | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- Unknown MINI-4w32-mggp-qw24
- Unknown DEBIAN-CVE-2026-54787
- Unknown MINI-43wj-5rc4-8m56
- Unknown UBUNTU-CVE-2026-54787
- Unknown DEBIAN-CVE-2026-49834
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Site Security Check
Is sigstore part of your stack?
CVE-2026-48815 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.