🛡️ CVE-2026-49824 — fission
Description
Fission: Cross-namespace Environment reference via unvalidated EnvironmentRef in Function admission webhook
Summary
The Fission Function admission webhook (pkg/webhook/function.go) validated that spec.secrets[].namespace and spec.configmaps[].namespace equalled the function's own namespace but performed no equivalent check on
spec.environment.namespace.
Details
An attacker with permission to create Functions in their own namespace could set spec.environment.namespace to any other tenant's namespace. poolmgr and newdeploy would then look up and use the victim's Environment CRD when scheduling
function pods, so the attacker's function executed inside the victim's container image.
This is useful both for code and credential theft — the victim's runtime image may contain hardcoded secrets — and for confused-deputy attacks where the victim's runtime image is a privileged sidecar.
Impact
A tenant with functions.fission.io/create could run their own function code inside another tenant's container image, breaking the namespace trust boundary that the Function specification implies.
Fix
Fixed in [#3389](https://github.com/fission/fission/pull/3389) and released in [v1.24.0](https://github.com/fission/fission/releases/tag/v1.24.0).
- Admission webhook (
pkg/webhook/function.go::Validate) rejectsFunction.spec.environment.namespace != metadata.namespace. An empty namespace remains accepted (the CLI defaults it to the function's namespace). - Controller belt-and-braces: the same check runs before the cross-namespace
Environments(...).Getin poolmgrgetFunctionEnvand newdeployfnCreate/RefreshFuncPods, covering webhook-bypass clusters (failurePolicy=Ignore)
and stale Function objects from upgrade-before-restart windows.
Behavioural change
Functions that explicitly set spec.environment.namespace to a different namespace are now rejected at admission. Empty-string remains accepted.
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is changed, meaning a successful attack can affect components beyond the vulnerable one. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity low, availability none.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-49824 is classified as CWE-284: Improper Access Control. The software does not restrict an action to the actors that should be allowed to perform it.
Affected software
CVE-2026-49824 is recorded against 2 packages.
- github.com/fission/fission
- unknown
Timeline and source
Published on 30 June 2026 and last revised on 7 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.
References
github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/fission/fission | — | — |
| unknown | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- Unknown GO-2026-5849
- High GHSA-7m8x-qg2j-4m3v
- High CVE-2026-49821
- High CVE-2026-49823
- High CVE-2026-49822
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Site Security Check
Is fission part of your stack?
CVE-2026-49824 is rated CVSS 8.5 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.