🛡️ CVE-2026-50570 — fission
Description
Fission: Incomplete capability denylist in Environment/Function PodSpec validation allows tenant-added CAP_SYS_TIME and cross-tenant node wall-clock corruption
Fission v1.24.0 added PodSpec safety validation for tenant-facing Environment and Function CRDs (ValidatePodSpecSafety / ValidateContainerSafety admission webhook + sanitizeContainerSecurityContext executor merge layer), but the
capability check was implemented as a fixed denylist of six Linux capabilities (SYS_ADMIN, NET_ADMIN, SYS_PTRACE, SYS_MODULE, DAC_READ_SEARCH, DAC_OVERRIDE). The denylist omitted CAP_SYS_TIME, among others. As a result, a tenant
who could create a Function or Environment CRD could request securityContext.capabilities.add: ["SYS_TIME"], pass Fission's admission validation and merge-layer sanitization, and run attacker-controlled code with CAP_SYS_TIME in the
resulting function or runtime container.
Demonstrated consequence: cross-tenant node integrity damage via CAP_SYS_TIME. The Linux real-time clock is not namespaced — time namespaces virtualize only MONOTONIC and BOOTTIME, never REALTIME — so a tenant container holding
CAP_SYS_TIME could call clock_settime(CLOCK_REALTIME) and rewrite the shared node wall clock. That corrupts TLS / certificate validity windows, Kubernetes lease renewal, token expiry, scheduling, and time-series for every workload on
the node.
The denylist also omitted SYS_RAWIO, BPF, SYS_RESOURCE, and MAC_ADMIN. Those are documented as evidence that the denylist is structurally incomplete (their practical impact is kernel-, LSM-, or device-cgroup-dependent and is not
exercised in this report).
The deeper structural problem: a denylist on capabilities.add cannot constrain capabilities the OCI runtime grants by default — DAC_OVERRIDE is in the OCI default cap set and reaches the container regardless of any add check,
partially mooting the denylist for its own entries. A capability allowlist (with drop:["ALL"] to remove the default set) is the only model that addresses both problems.
Affected
- Project:
github.com/fission/fission - Versions:
<= 1.24.0 - Audited commits: v1.24.0 tag (
ce617120) and current HEAD at audit time - Component:
pkg/apis/core/v1/podspec_safety.go(dangerousCapabilities) andpkg/executor/util/merge.go(dangerousMergeContainerCapabilities) - Pre-condition: cluster does not enforce a restrictive Pod Security Admission (PSA) profile on the function-pod namespace. With PSA
restrictedin force the API server's PodSecurity admission rejects the pod at creation and this
finding does not apply. Fission added its own PodSpec validation precisely because it cannot assume PSA enforcement.
Fix section (paste into the Fix / Patches field)
Fixed in [v1.25.0](https://github.com/fission/fission/releases/tag/v1.25.0) by:
- [PR #3465](https://github.com/fission/fission/pull/3465) (commit [
2569b42b](https://github.com/fission/fission/commit/2569b42b)) — replace the denylist with a PSA-restricted allowlist (NET_BIND_SERVICEonly) at both enforcement
layers:
pkg/apis/core/v1/podspec_safety.go—ValidateContainerSafetynow rejects anycapabilities.addentry not inallowedCapabilities. The container check is invoked fromValidatePodSpecSafetyfor every PodSpec container /
init-container and from Environment.validateForAdmission for the bare Runtime.Container / Builder.Container.
pkg/executor/util/merge.go—sanitizeContainerSecurityContextfilterscapabilities.addthrough the same allowlist at every merge site (poolmgr / newdeploy / container executor / builder).- The same PR adds 21 bounded CEL
XValidationrules covering the cheap pod-level invariants (hostNetwork/hostPID/hostIPC/serviceAccountName/serviceAccountoverride) onFunctionSpec,Runtime, andBuilder, plus
the bare-Container SecurityContext checks (privileged != true, allowPrivilegeEscalation != true, capabilities.add ⊆ {NET_BIND_SERVICE}) on Runtime and Builder. The API server now short-circuits those attack vectors per CRD
apply before the webhook is invoked. Per-container PodSpec iteration stays in the webhook because it exceeds the API server's CEL cost budget.
- The same PR also adds two forward-compat regression guards in
pkg/apis/core/v1/podspec_safety_test.go: TestAllTenantContainerSurfacesAreValidatedwalks every CRD root type via reflection and fails if any reachable*apiv1.PodSpecor*apiv1.Containerfield is missing from the hand-maintained known-covered set.TestTenantContainerSurfaces_RejectSysAdminend-to-end exercises each covered surface and assertsValidateForAdmissionrejects aSYS_ADMINinjection at that exact path.
Not addressed in v1.25.0
The advisory's structural recommendation to force capabilities.drop: ["ALL"] at the merge layer is not part of this fix. Fission's own sidecar containers (fission-fetcher, builder) were authored against the OCI de
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is changed, meaning a successful attack can affect components beyond the vulnerable one. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity high, availability low.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-50570 is classified as CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management. Privileges are assigned, dropped or restored incorrectly, leaving an actor with more access than intended.
Affected software
CVE-2026-50570 is recorded against 2 packages.
- github.com/fission/fission
- unknown
Timeline and source
Published on 28 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.
References
github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/fission/fission | — | — |
| unknown | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- Unknown GO-2026-5849
- High GHSA-7m8x-qg2j-4m3v
- High CVE-2026-49821
- High CVE-2026-49823
- High CVE-2026-49822
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Site Security Check
Is fission part of your stack?
CVE-2026-50570 is rated CVSS 8.5 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.