🛡️ CVE-2026-53624 — fiber
Description
GoFiber never set HSTS header in helmet middleware due to incorrect protocol check
Summary
The helmet middleware in gofiber/fiber never sets the Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) response header, even when HSTSMaxAge is explicitly configured, because the condition check at helmet.go:67 uses c.Protocol() — which returns the HTTP protocol version string (e.g., "HTTP/1.1", "HTTP/2.0") — instead of c.Scheme() — which returns the URL scheme ("http" or "https"). Since c.Protocol() never equals "https" in any real deployment, the HSTS header is permanently disabled, defeating the security protection.
Details
Root cause: middleware/helmet/helmet.go, line 67:
```go
if c.Protocol() == "https" && cfg.HSTSMaxAge != 0 {
```
c.Protocol() (defined at req.go:865-867) delegates to fasthttp.Request.Header.Protocol(), which returns the HTTP protocol version:
"HTTP/1.1"for HTTP/1.1 connections"HTTP/2.0"for HTTP/2 connections
The correct method is c.Scheme() (defined at req.go:844-862), which returns:
"http"for plain HTTP connections"https"for TLS connections
Since "HTTP/1.1" != "https" always evaluates to true, the entire HSTS block (lines 67-76) is dead code.
Note on test coverage: The existing helmet test (helmet_test.go) passes because it uses ctx.Request.Header.SetProtocol("https") to artificially force Protocol() to return "https". However, fasthttp.Request.Header.SetProtocol() sets the HTTP version field, and real HTTP requests never have protocol "https" — they have "HTTP/1.1" or "HTTP/2.0". The test is validating the wrong thing.
PoC
Clean-checkout maintainer-runnable recipe:
1. Save the following as middleware/helmet/poc_hsts_test.go:
```go
package helmet
import (
"crypto/tls"
"net/http/httptest"
"testing"
"github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3"
)
func Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet(t *testing.T) {
app := fiber.New()
app.Use(New(Config{
HSTSMaxAge: 31536000,
}))
app.Get("/", func(c fiber.Ctx) error {
return c.SendString("ok")
})
// Simulate HTTPS connection
req := httptest.NewRequest(fiber.MethodGet, "/", nil)
req.TLS = &tls.ConnectionState{}
resp, _ := app.Test(req)
hsts := resp.Header.Get("Strict-Transport-Security")
if hsts == "" {
t.Log("BUG CONFIRMED: HSTS header not set. c.Protocol() returns 'HTTP/1.1', not 'https'")
t.Log("Fix: change c.Protocol() == 'https' to c.Scheme() == 'https' on line 67")
}
}
```
2. Run: go test -run Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet -v ./middleware/helmet/
Expected vulnerable output:
```
=== RUN Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet
BUG CONFIRMED: HSTS header not set. c.Protocol() returns 'HTTP/1.1', not 'https'
Fix: change c.Protocol() == 'https' to c.Scheme() == 'https' on line 67
--- PASS: Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet
```
Expected output after fix:
```
=== RUN Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet
--- PASS: Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet
(HSTS header is set: "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains")
```
Observed output from this environment (commit ee98695f):
```
=== RUN Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet
poc_hsts_test.go:39: HSTS header value: ""
poc_hsts_test.go:42: BUG CONFIRMED: HSTS header is NOT set even over TLS
poc_hsts_test.go:43: Root cause: helmet.go:67 uses c.Protocol() which returns HTTP version
poc_hsts_test.go:44: c.Protocol() returns 'HTTP/1.1' not 'https'
poc_hsts_test.go:45: Fix: use c.Scheme() == 'https' instead of c.Protocol() == 'https'
--- PASS: Test_PoC_HSTS_NeverSet
```
Negative/control case: With HSTSMaxAge: 0 (default), HSTS is correctly not set (this is expected behavior, not a bug).
Cleanup: Remove poc_hsts_test.go after verification.
Impact
The HSTS header is never applied in production, leaving all users vulnerable to:
- SSL stripping attacks: An active network attacker can downgrade HTTPS connections to HTTP, intercepting traffic between the client and server.
- Protocol downgrade: Without HSTS, browsers will silently accept HTTP connections to the site, even if the site supports HTTPS.
- Cookie theft over HTTP: Session cookies without the
Secureflag will be sent over HTTP if the user is tricked into an HTTP connection.
This affects any application that:
1. Uses the helmet middleware
2. Configures HSTSMaxAge > 0 expecting HSTS protection
3. Serves traffic over HTTPS
The vulnerability requires an active MITM attacker on the network path, which is realistic in public Wi-Fi, corporate networks, and ISP-level scenarios.
Suggested remediation
In middleware/helmet/helmet.go, line 67, replace c.Protocol() with c.Scheme():
```go
// Before (broken):
if c.Protocol() == "https" && cfg.HSTSMaxAge != 0 {
// After (fixed):
if c.Scheme() == "https" && cfg.HSTSMaxAge != 0 {
```
Additionally, update the existing test to use a realistic TLS simulation instead of SetProtocol("https"):
```go
// Before (artificial - sets HTTP versi
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality low, integrity low, availability none.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-53624 is classified as CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information. Sensitive data crosses the network without encryption and can be read or altered in transit.
Affected software
CVE-2026-53624 is recorded against 3 packages.
- fiber (fixed in 3.4.0)
- github.com/gofiber/fiber
- github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3
Timeline and source
Published on 8 July 2026 and last revised on 15 July 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from NVD.
References
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| fiber | — | 3.4.0 |
| github.com/gofiber/fiber | — | — |
| github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3 | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- Medium CVE-2026-44332
- Medium CVE-2026-45045
- Medium CVE-2026-42554
- Medium CVE-2026-30246
- High CVE-2026-25882
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Exploit Protection
Are you running fiber?
CVE-2026-53624 carries CVSS 4.8 Medium rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.
Check My Site For CVE-2026-53624 →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.