🛡️ CVE-2026-55164 — lemur
Description
Lemur user-update path stores plaintext passwords
Summary
lemur.users.service.update() writes a user's new password as plaintext to the users.password column. The User model wires bcrypt hashing to SQLAlchemy's before_insert event but registers no equivalent listener for before_update, and service.update() does not call user.hash_password() after assigning the new value. Every password change performed through the admin-gated PUT /api/1/users/<id> endpoint persists the user's password to the database in cleartext.
Root Cause
lemur/users/models.py:
```python
# line 38
class User(BaseModel):
__tablename__ = "users"
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
password = Column(String(128)) # plain column, no setter, no Vault descriptor
# line 74
def hash_password(self):
if self.password:
self.password = bcrypt.generate_password_hash(self.password).decode("utf-8")
# line 111
listen(User, "before_insert", hash_password) # only before_insert is wired
```
lemur/users/service.py:
```python
# line 46
def update(user_id, username, email, active, profile_picture, roles, password=None):
...
user = get(user_id)
user.username = username
user.email = email
user.active = active
user.profile_picture = profile_picture
if password:
user.password = password # raw assignment
update_roles(user, roles)
return database.update(user) # commits, no hashing
```
No before_update listener exists. User.password is a plain Column(String(128)) with no property setter that hashes on assignment. The bcrypt code path is bypassed entirely on every UPDATE statement that touches this column.
Affected Endpoints
| Method | Path | Source |
|---|---|---|
| PUT | /api/1/users/<id> | lemur/users/views.py:274 (gated by @admin_permission.require) |
lemur/auth/views.py:323 also calls user_service.update() during SSO/OAuth login, but passes only six positional arguments. password defaults to None on that path and the if password: guard short-circuits. The bug is triggered only through the admin-only PUT handler.
Impact
When an administrator changes a user's password via PUT /api/1/users/<id>, the cleartext password is persisted to users.password. Subsequent login attempts for that user will fail (check_password calls bcrypt.check_password_hash against an unhashed value), pushing operators toward workarounds.
The more serious consequence is a defense-in-depth bypass. Bcrypt is the protection that prevents a database compromise from yielding usable credentials. With plaintext rows present, an attacker who exfiltrates the users table, a backup, a read replica, or query logs obtains directly usable login credentials — no offline cracking required. Because users reuse passwords across services, the blast radius extends beyond Lemur.
The bug specifically affects admin-driven password resets, which are the normal post-incident workflow and exactly when plaintext storage is most harmful.
Steps to Reproduce
1. Install Lemur with default config. Create an admin user and a target user 'alice' (created via the standard flow, password will be hashed correctly on insert).
2. Verify the initial hash:
psql lemur -c "SELECT password FROM users WHERE username='alice';"
# Output: $2b$12$N9Q... (bcrypt hash, as expected)
3. As admin, change alice's password via the API:
curl -X PUT https://lemur.local/api/1/users/<alice_id> \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <admin_jwt>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"username": "alice",
"email": "[email protected]",
"active": true,
"profile_picture": null,
"roles": [{"name": "operator"}],
"password": "ProofOfConcept_2026"
}'
4. Read the column again:
psql lemur -c "SELECT password FROM users WHERE username='alice';"
# Output: ProofOfConcept_2026 ← plaintext, not hashed
5. Confirm the failure mode: 'alice' can no longer log in with 'ProofOfConcept_2026'
because check_password runs bcrypt.check_password_hash() against the cleartext column.
Remediation
Register the listener for both events:
```python
# lemur/users/models.py
listen(User, "before_insert", hash_password)
listen(User, "before_update", hash_password)
```
Alternative, equivalent fix in the service layer:
```python
# lemur/users/service.py, in update()
if password:
user.password = password
user.hash_password()
```
The listener fix is preferred because it closes the gap for any future code path that mutates user.password.
A one-time migration is recommended to detect and re-hash any rows already stored in cleartext. Bcrypt hashes begin with $2b$, $2a$, or $2y$. Any cleartext credential should be treated as compromised — rotate it, do not just re-hash it — since it has been at rest in plaintext and may exist in backups, audit
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs administrative privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity none, availability none.
Affected software
CVE-2026-55164 is recorded against 1 package.
- lemur (fixed in 1.9.2)
Timeline and source
Published on 25 June 2026 and last revised on 13 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from OSV.
References
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| lemur | — | 1.9.2 |
References
Similar Threats
- High CVE-2026-48508
- Unknown CVE-2026-55162
- Unknown CVE-2026-55163
- Unknown CVE-2026-55165
- Critical CVE-2026-55166
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Free Vulnerability Check
Is your site affected by CVE-2026-55164?
BotEraser helps you identify potentially vulnerable plugins and themes by checking your installation against CVE-2026-55164 and other known CVE records.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.