🛡️ CVE-2026-58203 — pydantic-settings

🟡 CVSS 5.3 — Medium ⚠️ Exploit Public CWE-22 OSV
5.3
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

pydantic-settings: NestedSecretsSettingsSource follows symlinks outside secrets_dir, enabling local file read and bypassing secrets_dir_max_size

Summary

NestedSecretsSettingsSource reads secret values from files in a configured secrets_dir. When secrets_nested_subdir=True, a directory entry inside secrets_dir that is a symbolic link pointing outside secrets_dir is followed, so files outside the configured directory are read into settings values. The same code path bypasses the documented secrets_dir_max_size protection. An attacker or lower-privileged component able to influence entries in the configured secrets directory (for example, a writable or shared secrets mount) can turn this into an unintended local file read into settings and can defeat the advertised loading-size cap. This report does not claim network reachability by itself.

Details

NestedSecretsSettingsSource performed two passes over secrets_dir using two different, inconsistent directory-traversal implementations:

  • The size check in validate_secrets_path() used Path.glob('/*'), which does not** descend into a symbolically-linked directory.
  • The loader in load_secrets() used glob.iglob(f'{path}//*', recursive=True) followed by read_text(), which does** follow symlinked directories and reads through the link target.

Because the two passes disagreed on symlinks, a symlinked directory inside secrets_dir whose target lives elsewhere was invisible to the size accounting (counted as 0 bytes) while still being fully read by the loader. This produces two distinct problems:

1. Out-of-tree read (CWE-22 / CWE-59). A symlinked directory (or file) inside secrets_dir that resolves outside it is followed, and the external file's contents are loaded into the corresponding settings field.

2. secrets_dir_max_size bypass (CWE-400). The size check never sees the out-of-tree content, so the documented size cap is neither respected nor able to reject the oversized external file. A related amplification exists for cyclic in-tree symlinks, which glob.iglob(recursive=True) re-traverses, inflating the size accounting and the number of loaded secrets.

Reproduction

In a clean Linux container, with a secrets_dir containing a symlink secrets/db -> /path/outside and an outside/passwd file of 512 bytes, while secrets_dir_max_size=100:

```python

from pydantic import BaseModel

from pydantic_settings import (

BaseSettings,

SettingsConfigDict,

NestedSecretsSettingsSource,

)

class Db(BaseModel):

passwd: str | None = None

class Settings(BaseSettings):

model_config = SettingsConfigDict(

secrets_dir='secrets',

secrets_nested_subdir=True,

secrets_dir_max_size=100, # outside/passwd is 512 bytes

)

db: Db = Db()

@classmethod

def settings_customise_sources(

cls, settings_cls, init_settings, env_settings, dotenv_settings, file_secret_settings

):

return (NestedSecretsSettingsSource(file_secret_settings),)

```

On affected versions, Settings().db.passwd is populated with the 512-byte out-of-tree file and no SettingsError is raised, even though the file exceeds secrets_dir_max_size.

Impact

Applications that opt into NestedSecretsSettingsSource with secrets_nested_subdir=True and load secrets from a directory whose entries can be influenced by an attacker or a lower-privileged component (for example, a writable or shared secrets mount, or a secrets directory partially populated from untrusted input) are affected. The impact is:

  • Confidentiality: files outside the configured secrets_dir can be read into settings values (local file read).
  • Integrity / availability of the safeguard: the advertised secrets_dir_max_size cap can be bypassed, and cyclic symlinks can inflate resource usage during loading.

The vulnerability requires the ability to place a symbolic link inside the configured secrets directory; it is not remotely reachable on its own. Applications that do not use NestedSecretsSettingsSource, or that point secrets_dir at a directory fully under the application's control, are not affected.

Mitigation

Upgrade to pydantic-settings 2.14.2, which:

  • walks the secrets directory explicitly and only descends into directories whose resolved path stays within secrets_dir, so symlinked directories pointing outside are never followed;
  • uses a single, cycle-safe iterator for both the size check and the loader, so the size accounting and the loaded set are always consistent and each real directory is visited at most once;
  • skips any file whose resolved path escapes secrets_dir, as defense in depth.

If upgrading is not immediately possible, ensure the configured secrets_dir is fully owned and controlled by the application (no writable or attacker-influenced entries), or avoid secrets_nested_subdir=True.

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached with local access to the system, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs low-level privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality low, integrity low, availability low.

Weakness class

CVE-2026-58203 is classified as CWE-22: Path Traversal. A file path built from user input is not confined to the intended directory, letting an attacker reach files elsewhere on the filesystem.

Affected software

CVE-2026-58203 is recorded against 1 package.

  • pydantic-settings (from 2.12.0 up to 2.14.2)

Timeline and source

Published on 19 June 2026 and last revised on 27 July 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. Record sourced from OSV.

References

github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)

Details

Severity MEDIUM
CVSS Score 5.3
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CWE CWE-22
Public Exploit ⚠️ Yes
Source OSV
Published 2026-06-19
Updated 2026-08-12
Modified 2026-07-27
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
pydantic-settings 2.12.0 2.14.2

Exploit Protection

Are you running pydantic-settings?

CVE-2026-58203 carries CVSS 5.3 Medium rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.

Check My Site For CVE-2026-58203 →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.