🛡️ GHSA-262p-vjx5-45xh — pingora-core (CVE-2026-2835)

🔴 CVSS 9.5 — Critical ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-444 OSV
9.5
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Duplicate Advisory: HTTP Request Smuggling via HTTP/1.0 and Transfer-Encoding Misparsing

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-hj7x-879w-vrp7. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

An HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability (CWE-444) has been found in Pingora's parsing of HTTP/1.0 and Transfer-Encoding requests. The issue occurs due to improperly allowing HTTP/1.0 request bodies to be close-delimited and incorrect handling of multiple Transfer-Encoding values, allowing attackers to send HTTP/1.0 requests in a way that would desync Pingora’s request framing from backend servers’.

Impact

This vulnerability primarily affects standalone Pingora deployments in front of certain backends that accept HTTP/1.0 requests. An attacker could craft a malicious payload following this request that Pingora forwards to the backend in order to:

  • Bypass proxy-level ACL controls and WAF logic
  • Poison caches and upstream connections, causing subsequent requests from legitimate users to receive responses intended for smuggled requests
  • Perform cross-user attacks by hijacking sessions or smuggling requests that appear to originate from the trusted proxy IP

Cloudflare's CDN infrastructure was not affected by this vulnerability, as its ingress proxy layers forwarded HTTP/1.1 requests only, rejected ambiguous framing such as invalid Content-Length values, and forwarded a single Transfer-Encoding: chunked header for chunked requests.

Mitigation:

Pingora users should upgrade to Pingora v0.8.0 or higher that fixes this issue by correctly parsing message length headers per RFC 9112 and strictly adhering to more RFC guidelines, including that HTTP request bodies are never close-delimited.

As a workaround, users can reject certain requests with an error in the request filter logic in order to stop processing bytes on the connection and disable downstream connection reuse. The user should reject any non-HTTP/1.1 request, or a request that has invalid Content-Length, multiple Transfer-Encoding headers, or Transfer-Encoding header that is not an exact “chunked” string match.

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity high, availability none.

Weakness class

GHSA-262p-vjx5-45xh is classified as CWE-444: HTTP Request Smuggling. A proxy and a server disagree on where one request ends, letting an attacker slip a second request past the front end.

Affected software

GHSA-262p-vjx5-45xh is recorded against 1 package.

  • pingora-core

Timeline and source

Published on 5 March 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from OSV.

References

nvd.nist.gov (Advisory)
github.com (Web)
rustsec.org (Web)

Details

Severity CRITICAL
CVSS Score 9.5
CVSS Vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CWE CWE-444
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source OSV
Published 2026-03-05
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-03-05
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
pingora-core

Similar Threats

Exploit Protection

Are you running pingora-core?

GHSA-262p-vjx5-45xh carries CVSS 9.5 Critical rating. BotEraser checks your installation against this and other known CVE records, and blocks IPs associated with exploit activity.

Check My Site For GHSA-262p-vjx5-45xh →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesGitHub AdvisoryGitHub Advisory Undated