🛡️ GHSA-3prj-6hqw-cm82 — jwt-framework

🟠 CVSS 8.0 — High ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-400 OSV
8.0
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

PHP JWT Library: PBES2-HS*+A*KW unwrap accepts an unbounded p2c iteration count, enabling CPU-amplification denial of service

Impact

When a JWE uses a password-based key-encryption algorithm (PBES2-HS256+A128KW, PBES2-HS384+A192KW, PBES2-HS512+A256KW), PBES2AESKW::unwrapKey() reads the p2c (PBKDF2 iteration count) parameter directly from the attacker-controlled JOSE header and passes it to hash_pbkdf2() with no upper bound. The only validation performed (checkHeaderAdditionalParameters()) was is_int($p2c) && $p2c > 0.

An unauthenticated attacker can craft a single JWE whose protected header sets a very large p2c (e.g. 100_000_000 ≈ 87 s of CPU, or PHP_INT_MAX), forcing a worker to spend an arbitrary amount of CPU inside PBKDF2 before the key unwrap can even fail. The decrypter swallows the eventual exception, so the attacker pays almost nothing while the server burns CPU. JSON General serialization (multiple recipients) and multi-key JWKSets multiply the cost. This is a classic uncontrolled-resource-consumption (CWE-400) denial of service.

Affected configurations

Applications that register any PBES2-HS*+A*KW algorithm in their decryption AlgorithmManager.

Patches

PBES2AESKW now enforces a configurable maximum iteration count (DEFAULT_MAX_COUNT = 1_000_000, well above realistic legitimate values which are a few thousand) in checkHeaderAdditionalParameters(), before any PBKDF2 computation. The bound is exposed as a constructor argument so operators can tune it.

Workarounds

Before upgrading: validate/limit the p2c header with a custom header checker, or do not enable PBES2 algorithms for untrusted tokens.

References

  • RFC 7518 §4.8 (PBES2)
  • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Résolution

Un correctif a été préparé sur une branche dédiée basée sur 3.4.x, avec des tests anti-régression dédiés (fork privé temporaire de cette advisory, PR #1).

PBES2PBES2AESKW::unwrapKey() borne désormais le paramètre p2c (constante DEFAULT_MAX_COUNT = 1_000_000, configurable via le constructeur) avant tout appel à hash_pbkdf2(), empêchant l'amplification CPU (DoS).

Validation : php -l OK, PHPUnit vert, aucune nouvelle erreur PHPStan introduite (différentiel nul vs 3.4.x), aucun commentaire ajouté dans le code source. Après merge, cascade prévue 3.4.x → 4.0.x → 4.1.x.

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.

Weakness class

GHSA-3prj-6hqw-cm82 is classified as CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption. A request can consume memory, CPU or storage without limit, exhausting capacity for everyone else.

Affected software

GHSA-3prj-6hqw-cm82 is recorded against 2 packages.

  • web-token/jwt-framework (from 4.1.0 up to 4.1.7)
  • web-token/jwt-library (from 4.1.0 up to 4.1.7)

Timeline and source

Published on 18 June 2026 and last revised on 15 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from OSV.

References

github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)

Details

Severity HIGH
CVSS Score 8.0
CVSS Vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CWE CWE-400
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source OSV
Published 2026-06-18
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-07-15
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
web-token/jwt-framework 4.1.0 4.1.7
web-token/jwt-library 4.1.0 4.1.7

Similar Threats

Site Security Check

Is jwt-framework part of your stack?

GHSA-3prj-6hqw-cm82 is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesGitHub AdvisoryGitHub Advisory Undated