🛡️ RUSTSEC-2026-0194 — quick-xml
Description
Quadratic run time when checking a start tag for duplicate attribute names
BytesStart::attributes() returns an Attributes iterator which, by default
(with_checks(true)), rejects a start tag that repeats an attribute name. For
each attribute yielded, the iterator compared the new name against every name
seen so far in the same tag using a linear scan, so a start tag with N
distinct attribute names cost O(N²) byte comparisons. There was no bound on
N other than the size of the buffered start tag.
Impact
Any code that parses untrusted XML and iterates a start tag's attributes with
the default duplicate check enabled can be made to spend CPU time quadratic in
the number of attributes on a single tag. Because the check is pure computation
with no .await/I/O, an I/O-based timeout on the consumer (for example a read
or request timeout) cannot interrupt it while it runs.
Measured cost of a single start tag, release build:
| Attributes on one tag | Time |
|---|---|
| 80,000 | ~6 s |
| 800,000 | ~10 min |
The cost grows with the square of the attribute count, so a start tag of a few
tens of megabytes can stall a parsing thread for hours. No memory is exhausted
and the parser does not crash; the effect is CPU exhaustion on the thread doing
the parsing: a single crafted start tag can pin a CPU core for minutes to hours,
denying service to that worker. A deployment that places a wall-clock bound on
parsing, or confines it to a non-critical thread, may consider the availability
impact lower.
Affected code paths
BytesStart::attributes()/Attributesiterated with checks enabled (the
default), and BytesStart::try_get_attribute.
NsReader, which resolves namespaces by iterating a tag's attributes and so
reaches the same check internally.
Consumers that iterate attributes with .attributes().with_checks(false) and do
not use NsReader are not affected.
This was reported as reachable by a remote, unauthenticated attacker in a
real-world RPKI relying party (NLnet Labs Routinator) via a crafted RRDP
snapshot.xml.
Remediation
Upgrade to quick-xml >= 0.41.0, where the duplicate check keeps the linear
scan for start tags with a small number of attributes and switches to an O(1)
hash pre-filter above a threshold, making the whole tag O(N). The reported
AttrError::Duplicated positions are unchanged.
If upgrading is not possible and duplicate-name detection is not required,
disable it with .attributes().with_checks(false) (this does not help
NsReader consumers, which have no equivalent opt-out before 0.41.0).
How this vulnerability can be exploited
This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.
Affected software
RUSTSEC-2026-0194 is recorded against 1 package.
- quick-xml
Timeline and source
Published on 29 June 2026 and last revised on 2 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from OSV.
References
crates.io (Package)
rustsec.org (Advisory)
github.com (Report)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)
Details
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Affected Packages
| Software | From version | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| quick-xml | — | — |
References
Similar Threats
- Unknown RUSTSEC-2026-0195
More RUSTSEC 2026 advisories
Browse all of RUSTSEC 2026 in the advisory index.
Free Vulnerability Check
Is your site affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0194?
BotEraser helps you identify potentially vulnerable plugins and themes by checking your installation against RUSTSEC-2026-0194 and other known CVE records.
Scan My Site Free →No credit card required · Results in minutes
ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.