🛡️ RUSTSEC-2026-0194 — quick-xml

⚪ Unknown ✅ No Known Exploit OSV
N/A
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Quadratic run time when checking a start tag for duplicate attribute names

BytesStart::attributes() returns an Attributes iterator which, by default

(with_checks(true)), rejects a start tag that repeats an attribute name. For

each attribute yielded, the iterator compared the new name against every name

seen so far in the same tag using a linear scan, so a start tag with N

distinct attribute names cost O(N²) byte comparisons. There was no bound on

N other than the size of the buffered start tag.

Impact

Any code that parses untrusted XML and iterates a start tag's attributes with

the default duplicate check enabled can be made to spend CPU time quadratic in

the number of attributes on a single tag. Because the check is pure computation

with no .await/I/O, an I/O-based timeout on the consumer (for example a read

or request timeout) cannot interrupt it while it runs.

Measured cost of a single start tag, release build:

| Attributes on one tag | Time |

|---|---|

| 80,000 | ~6 s |

| 800,000 | ~10 min |

The cost grows with the square of the attribute count, so a start tag of a few

tens of megabytes can stall a parsing thread for hours. No memory is exhausted

and the parser does not crash; the effect is CPU exhaustion on the thread doing

the parsing: a single crafted start tag can pin a CPU core for minutes to hours,

denying service to that worker. A deployment that places a wall-clock bound on

parsing, or confines it to a non-critical thread, may consider the availability

impact lower.

Affected code paths

  • BytesStart::attributes() / Attributes iterated with checks enabled (the

default), and BytesStart::try_get_attribute.

  • NsReader, which resolves namespaces by iterating a tag's attributes and so

reaches the same check internally.

Consumers that iterate attributes with .attributes().with_checks(false) and do

not use NsReader are not affected.

This was reported as reachable by a remote, unauthenticated attacker in a

real-world RPKI relying party (NLnet Labs Routinator) via a crafted RRDP

snapshot.xml.

Remediation

Upgrade to quick-xml >= 0.41.0, where the duplicate check keeps the linear

scan for start tags with a small number of attributes and switches to an O(1)

hash pre-filter above a threshold, making the whole tag O(N). The reported

AttrError::Duplicated positions are unchanged.

If upgrading is not possible and duplicate-name detection is not required,

disable it with .attributes().with_checks(false) (this does not help

NsReader consumers, which have no equivalent opt-out before 0.41.0).

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is low, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high.

Affected software

RUSTSEC-2026-0194 is recorded against 1 package.

  • quick-xml

Timeline and source

Published on 29 June 2026 and last revised on 2 July 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from OSV.

References

crates.io (Package)
rustsec.org (Advisory)
github.com (Report)
github.com (Web)
github.com (Web)

Details

Severity Unknown
CVSS Score N/A
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CWE N/A
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source OSV
Published 2026-06-29
Updated 2026-08-12
Modified 2026-07-02
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
quick-xml

Similar Threats

Free Vulnerability Check

Is your site affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0194?

BotEraser helps you identify potentially vulnerable plugins and themes by checking your installation against RUSTSEC-2026-0194 and other known CVE records.

Scan My Site Free →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.