Skip to main content

Boteraser | Website and Server Security Solutions

🛡️ CVE-2022-1434 — a250-firmware

🟡 CVSS 5.9 — Medium ✅ No Known Exploit CWE-327 NVD
5.9
CVSS Score
0 Low4 Medium7 High9 Critical10

Description

Incorrect MAC key used in the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite

The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

How this vulnerability can be exploited

This issue can be reached over the network, attack complexity is high, an attacker needs no privileges on the target. No user interaction is required. The scope is unchanged, so the impact stays within the vulnerable component. Rated impact: confidentiality none, integrity high, availability none.

CVSS metrics in full

The score comes from this vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

  • Attack vector: Network — reachable from anywhere that can route to the service.
  • Attack complexity: High — the attacker first has to win a race, learn a secret or otherwise prepare the target.
  • Privileges required: None — an unauthenticated stranger can try it.
  • User interaction: None — nobody has to be tricked into anything.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the damage stays inside the vulnerable component.
  • Confidentiality impact: None.
  • Integrity impact: High — total loss, or loss the attacker controls.
  • Availability impact: None.

Weakness class

CVE-2022-1434 is classified as CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm. An algorithm with known weaknesses is used, so the protection it appears to give does not hold.

Affected software

CVE-2022-1434 is recorded against 27 packages.

  • a250-firmware
  • a700s-firmware
  • active-iq-unified-manager
  • aff-500f-firmware
  • aff-8300-firmware
  • aff-8700-firmware
  • aff-a400-firmware
  • clustered-data-ontap
  • clustered-data-ontap-antivirus-connector
  • fabric-attached-storage-a400-firmware
  • fas-500f-firmware
  • fas-8300-firmware
  • fas-8700-firmware
  • h300e-firmware
  • h300s-firmware
  • h410s-firmware
  • h500e-firmware
  • h500s-firmware
  • h700e-firmware
  • h700s-firmware
  • openssl (from 3.0.0 up to 3.0.3)
  • openssl-src
  • santricity-smi-s-provider
  • smi-s-provider
Show the remaining 3 packages
  • snapmanager
  • solidfire-\&-hci-management-node
  • solidfire\,-enterprise-sds-\&-hci-storage-node

Timeline and source

Published on 3 May 2022 and last revised on 17 June 2026. No public exploit is currently recorded for this entry. Record sourced from NVD.

References

cert-portal.siemens.com
git.openssl.org
security.netapp.com
www.openssl.org
cert-portal.siemens.com
git.openssl.org
security.netapp.com
www.openssl.org

Other advisories for this package

a250-firmware has other advisories on record. If you are patching this one, these are worth checking on the same host:

Same weakness in other software

These advisories are the same class of weakness (CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm) in other software:

CVE-2022-1434 on other distributions

Each distribution ships its own build and its own fixed version. Pick the one you run:

Details

Severity MEDIUM
CVSS Score 5.9
CVSS Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CWE CWE-327
Public Exploit ✅ No
Source NVD
Published 2022-05-03
Updated 2026-08-20
Modified 2026-06-17
Fix URL N/A

Affected Packages

Software From version Fixed in
a250-firmware — —
a700s-firmware — —
active-iq-unified-manager — —
aff-500f-firmware — —
aff-8300-firmware — —
aff-8700-firmware — —
aff-a400-firmware — —
clustered-data-ontap — —
clustered-data-ontap-antivirus-connector — —
fabric-attached-storage-a400-firmware — —
fas-500f-firmware — —
fas-8300-firmware — —
fas-8700-firmware — —
h300e-firmware — —
h300s-firmware — —
h410s-firmware — —
h500e-firmware — —
h500s-firmware — —
h700e-firmware — —
h700s-firmware — —
openssl 3.0.0 3.0.3
openssl-src — —
santricity-smi-s-provider — —
smi-s-provider — —
snapmanager — —
solidfire-\&-hci-management-node — —
solidfire\,-enterprise-sds-\&-hci-storage-node — —

Similar Threats

Vulnerability Monitoring

Track new vulnerabilities in a250-firmware

CVE-2022-1434 is rated CVSS 5.9 Medium. BotEraser monitors your WordPress installation and notifies you when software you use appears in our vulnerability database.

Set Up Free Alerts →

No credit card required  ·  Results in minutes

ⓘ Data Notice: The information presented above has been compiled from publicly available internet sources. Boteraser aggregates this data solely for informational purposes and does not independently classify, evaluate, or endorse any findings about the vulnerabilities listed. The accuracy and completeness of this information is the sole responsibility of the original publishers. Boteraser and its operators accept no liability for any decisions made based on this data.

Browse related advisories

All advisoriesCVECVE 2022
✓